Mafiascum.net

In post 149, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

In post 146, Human Destroyer wrote:

In post 135, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:HD: explain how DCL's vote was opportunistic

there's no build up to the vote, he just sorta says "LOL FOS OKAY NOW A VOTE NOW UR GONNA DIE CUZ I PUT U AT L-1 LOLOL"

the caution seems faked as well

(also no my majiffy scumread was a joke, and a fun one at that)

How about majiffy and Fery's votes?

DCL's stuck out as most contrived to me.
I mean, he literally made a post of "OMG I'm being cautious" then in his next post put someone at L-1. And it's only the 4th page.

It's a contradiction in strategies.

Oh shit it's the 7th

WHEN DID THIS GAME GET SO BIG >:(

In post 151, Human Destroyer wrote:Oh shit it's the 7th

WHEN DID THIS GAME GET SO BIG >:(

You just refuted your argument against me. I'll let you figure out why.

In post 152, DCLXVI wrote:

In post 151, Human Destroyer wrote:Oh shit it's the 7th

WHEN DID THIS GAME GET SO BIG >:(

You just refuted your argument against me. I'll let you figure out why.

Not really.
It's only the third page of srsbsns. So you still faked caution while not really having any such thing.

Therefore, you are, in fact, scum.
*closes briefcase*

You yourself admitted that things were moving fast. So I made sure I wasn't hammering. If you think that is scummy, good for you. Have fun convincing everyone else though.

In post 154, DCLXVI wrote:You yourself admitted that things were moving fast. So I made sure I wasn't hammering. If you think that is scummy, good for you. Have fun convincing everyone else though.

Oh yes, putting someone at L-1 so can hammer instead of you.
Super cautious. And super pro-town.

Well, I wasn't going to hammer without a claim. Had he been at l-1 I would have stated intent to hammer instead of voting.

In post 156, DCLXVI wrote:Well, I wasn't going to hammer without a claim. Had he been at l-1 I would have stated intent to hammer instead of voting.

You're completely missing my point. Or you're being purposefully obtuse.

You put on a show of being cautious and not hammering Minimal. You then proceed to place her into derp-hammer range in your very next post.

That's not cautious. That's a contradiction in playstyles. It's you trying to fake town concern.

I labeled my vote as L-1. It appeared at the top of the page in plain site.

I was making sure I wasn't doing a derp hammer and I took precautions so others wouldn't as well.

HD's case seems forced.

In post 144, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

In post 139, Majiffy wrote:Minimal what do you make of DCL's vote on me, and subsequent vote on you?

You're going to answer this yourself eventually right

No of course not.

In post 145, Minimal wrote:I don't think nothing to DC's vote, as his on you doesn't seem serious at the slightest, though his vote on me can easily be a sheeping townie.

I heavily disagree. I think his vote on me looked quite serious. And his vote on you looked pretty opportunistic as well. Thoughts?

Wait, somebody explain to me why scum-HD faking caution is more likely than town-HD being cautious

My vote on majiffy was not serious. I was just loling around.
My vote on minimal was serious. I think he is scum.

pedit @orc What are trying to say in 161?

I'm trying to say that I don't understand the case on you.

Vc

In post 161, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:Wait, somebody explain to me why scum-HD faking caution is more likely than town-HD being cautious

HD?

I meant DCL

because DCL's other posting doesn't display the same caution he had in that post in the slightest

I mean even his Majiffy vote, a fucking joke wagon, he had less worries about than the wagon on the person he actually wants to llync

In post 167, Human Destroyer wrote:because DCL's other posting doesn't display the same caution he had in that post in the slightest

I mean even his Majiffy vote, a fucking joke wagon, he had less worries about than the wagon on the person he actually wants to llync

Majiffy was a joke wagon. So why would he be cautious about his vote?

I know I would be more cautious if I were voting on a serious wagon rather than a joke one.

I just don't see this one.

And I don't think Majiffy ever got to L-2 or L-1

I didn't worry because I knew that there were only two votes on majify when I voted him. I was not aware of how many votes were on minimal when I fosd him to go check it out.

HD is also probably town, just saying.

In post 169, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:And I don't think Majiffy ever got to L-2 or L-1

dcl's vote was actually one of these

Putting someone at l-2 in a 9 person game isn't that big of a deal, that is just three votes.

In post 168, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

In post 167, Human Destroyer wrote:because DCL's other posting doesn't display the same caution he had in that post in the slightest

I mean even his Majiffy vote, a fucking joke wagon, he had less worries about than the wagon on the person he actually wants to llync

Majiffy was a joke wagon. So why would he be cautious about his vote?

I know I would be more cautious if I were voting on a serious wagon rather than a joke one.

I just don't see this one.

Cautiousness is a lot more important when the guy you're voting for