Mafiascum.net

sounds promising.

Votecount 1.06 - Wednesday, May 8th @ 4:46 PM EDT

TheEsquire -

0

^[L-5]

Cabd -

1

^[L-4]

- Shadi1337
richardfrost -

1

^[L-4]

- TheEsquire
Lazurial -

1

^[L-4]

- Jebus
Shadi1337 -

1

^[L-4]

- Cabd
jmo16mla -

0

^[L-5]

Klazam -

1

^[L-4]

- Lazurial
Jebus -

2

^[L-3]

- jmo16mla, Klazam
Ms Marangal -

0

^[L-5]

With

[9]

alive it takes

[5]

to Lynch or No Lynch.

Not Voting:

richardfrost, Ms Marangal

Deadline is in ... (expired on 2013-05-11 21:55:00)

Activity Check:

TheEsquire is V/LA until Thursday, May 9th
richardfrost is V/LA until Saturday, May 11th
Lazurial may be requested for prodding

Take your time Richard, some things come first!

Posting so I don't die. Real-posting when I get back from my final exam tonight. がんばります！

Jmo, I asked for your thought's on Klazam, why are you not answering me? :T

C, why is tunneling scummy, what is the scum motivation behind doing such an action?

Shadi, what about C do you think is scummy? what do you think of every other player in the game, myself included?

View post 112.

In post 153, Ms Marangal wrote: Shadi, what about C do you think is scummy? what do you think of every other player in the game, myself included?

Seems like a competent player and has come out with his own words, which seem honest enough. Null read but leaning to townie. Although not interrogated or asked he's let go of with a little analysis given.

I just feel like all the mini reasons he gets for jumping on a person are too small, every single stupid word or action he disagrees with he votes on you. It's the vibe I'm getting (no offence to you at all dude, it's your playstyle and I fully respect that). So, maybe to divert attention from himself on the tally he tries to start things of others

Null read, barely said anything game-related. I will give him the benefit of doubt by dodging the game due to school work; I'm in the same pinch myself.

Seems to question when weird things happen on the game and doesn't use it as an opportunity to start a tally on them, I'd say leaning to townie.

A simple townie genius
Seems to care that the game isn't going astray and tries to get everyone go on priorities, I'd say leaning townie. However, his "predecessor" was quite careless but I'm getting an entirely different read from this guy. And to be fair jon didn't really say anything other than that and prolly didn't answer coz he avoided the questions but he probably just stopped reading the thread


I find it a bit weird that he only had stuff on me at first, but I believe he's townie for trying to question "trusted" players and a good player would do that. (However, voting on them is a bit different) but could also be mafia and try commencing tallies on other people than themselves; not that a townie wouldn't but a scum would probably be very subtle about it

Doesn't talk a lot, leaning to scum but closer to null read.


I think she's a townie, no scum read so far.

In post 155, Shadi1337 wrote:

Shadi1337:

A simple townie genius

Why do you feel the need to say this?

I HATE IT WHEN PEOPLE INCLUDE THEMSELVES IN THEIR OWN READS LIST. /endrant

In post 156, Klazam wrote:

In post 155, Shadi1337 wrote:

Shadi1337:

A simple townie genius

Why do you feel the need to say this?

I HATE IT WHEN PEOPLE INCLUDE THEMSELVES IN THEIR OWN READS LIST. /endrant

I just copied the player list

How can you be anything but null on a player who has literally said nothing 7 pages into a game?

CAUSE YOURE NOT SAYING ANYTHING. Post or die.

If by "C" you meant me, ill get to it in the morning. Not feeling all that well, no flurry of posts from me until the morning (PST)

JEBUS. MOAR VOTES ON JEBUS.

He never even have us his read through.

THATS WHY. MORE VOTES

STOP YELLING AT ME!

jesus, waiting on C's response, and yes I'm talking to Cabd

and I didn't realize that that was an answer to me XD

@ms. All good, il start labeling things. Might help.

Much better, how a night of sleep makes a difference. Anyways.

In post 153, Ms Marangal wrote:C, why is tunneling scummy, what is the scum motivation behind doing such an action?

Tunneling in and of itself is not inherently scummy. I've seen it happen plenty of times before with a town player being the tunneler. However, scum can tunnel as a way to direct focus. For example, let's say we have a 5/15 wolf/town setup. Day one, two wolves tunnel two different players. With a majority of the discussion focused upon these two targets who may have made silly mistakes, all scum hunting discussion is redirected onto these two chosen targets. My team used it to great effect in pokegym game XVII-C http://pokegym.net/forums/showthread.php?t=168615, winning a flawless (as in all wolves survived to endgame and we won) victory. Having said that, I don't feel it's THAT strong of a tell even when observed, unless it's the same people over multiple days.

Can I get a definition of "tunneling"?

When someone focuses on one player for a unspecific amount of time. During this time the tunneler is calling the tunneled scum, throwing accusations and other such business at them.

In post 169, Shadi1337 wrote:Can I get a definition of "tunneling"?

What i was doing to you.

In post 171, Klazam wrote:

In post 169, Shadi1337 wrote:Can I get a definition of "tunneling"?

What i was doing to you.

Ah, I see.

In post 170, jmo16mla wrote:When someone focuses on one player for a unspecific amount of time. During this time the tunneler is calling the tunneled scum, throwing accusations and other such business at them.

I meant to quote both, double post heheehe.

3 days left....
At this point, it's time to start getting serious about voting and pushing wagons to L-1 etc. Last thing we need is a no lynch due to inactivity. Anyone care to disagree with that?