Page 7 of 15

Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 3:39 pm
by Candillan
In post 145, TheIrishPope wrote:How convenient that you changed your mind about mass-claiming when someone urged you to claim now.
For the non-sarcastic eye: You changed your opinion because someone wants something for you.
I believe the proper phrase is "Die scum die"
That's odd, I don't recall Who ever being against claiming their role.

Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 4:09 pm
by Doc Holliday
In post 147, ArcAngel9 wrote:calm down people..
we have time..so lets take this slow..
Doc, you and me have lot to talk ...
i said enough about mass claim. what do kind plan that you have that will ascertain possible. your denial is very suspicious. its like you're not even trying to understand. But that's not how i am trying to look today becuz there is no room for town to make any sort of errors and can get away with it.. my point is why do you don't want to have mass claim is a question?

And remember, finding right governor doesn't help win this game..you need to find CL.
and Mr TIP, i do see your point. At this moment i am tending to believe that it is only one CL and 4 town aligned players due to the size of the game. there won't be two cult leaders even in a 9p game. If chk had two anti town parties got involved into this game.. then it would perhpas be a wolf. So incase cult try to recruit wolf, he dies.. then it will be wolf VS town.. there could be numerous variations that i could give you but it will be too confusing right now. our best shot is "Mass claim" which will help in many ways.. I am not understanding why someone of you are against mass claim in a game like this... and DOC, you gotta stop being a stuborn. seriously. if you're town, let me tell you that youre being very anti-town. and if you're cult, i would say..not doing so bad for yourself but will get you for sure.

Candilian, don't worry about death note role. its not going to be in this game. if it is..i will shoot chk... i mean it.
Half of this does not make grammatical sense, and I therefore do not know where to begin responding to it. Please rephrase in at least sixth grade English, particularly about the "denial". As for why we shouldn't massclaim, I have explained several times in detail. Read it this time.

Also, stop saying that a massclaim will help as if it were a God-given law of the universe. It isn't and it won't. Disagree with me? Fine, you have been invited repeatedly to make a convincing case for massclaim that does not rely on circular, recursive logic, a la "massclaim is good because massclaim is good, and does good things."

One CL vs 4 Townies. Any other setup makes zero sense. Stop arguing the obvious.

Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 5:12 pm
by Candillan
Question:
Who, how early can you confirm yourself?

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 3:12 am
by Doc Holliday
Srsly

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 9:29 am
by Who
Not sure how to answer that question without claiming, so I'll just claim: Executioner.
I can confirm this by posting "execute" when we have decided who to lynch and they have accrued at least half of the votes required for a lynch. If it doesn't work, you can all lynch me. If it does, whoever else we decided on dies.

I am assuming it doesn't work on today's election, but I didn't receive any information on that and I haven't asked because I assumed that it won't.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:31 am
by TheIrishPope
In post 150, Candillan wrote:
In post 145, TheIrishPope wrote:How convenient that you changed your mind about mass-claiming when someone urged you to claim now.
For the non-sarcastic eye: You changed your opinion because someone wants something for you.
I believe the proper phrase is "Die scum die"
That's odd, I don't recall Who ever being against claiming their role.
What I meant was, he didn't actively advocate against it. Now he wants to do it. It seems odd.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:32 am
by Candillan
That's a cool role. You should ask the mod.

pedit:
I don't see that either.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:37 am
by Who
I've asked. If it will work, I'll prove my innocence today by "executing" the governor.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:39 am
by Who
And it only works for lynches. Thought so.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:50 am
by TheIrishPope
Oh, that's funny, because CHKFLIP ISN'T EVEN ONLINE
DIE DIE DIE

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:54 am
by Candillan
"Appear offline this session" is always an option.
Hey Pope, don't dismiss it as a lie automatically because of something that isn't necessarily the case.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:59 am
by TheIrishPope
I know, it was intended to be a joke anyway
Candillan, would you self hammer right now, given the discussion which is taking place?

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 11:01 am
by Who
1. I believe most people use that option.
2. A quick search of his posts says that he was online and posting at the time.

Candillan, don't do it yet, wait until we reach consensus on the mass-claim.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 12:05 pm
by Candillan
I don't plan on doing it. That suggestion rings of a sort of a silencing hammer, Pope.
That's also not good.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 12:37 pm
by Doc Holliday
Massclaim vote: no

Let's do it that way.

Also, executioner may as well be an innocent child. CL that can execute is wtf powerful

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 12:51 pm
by Who
Massclaim vote: Yes

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:17 pm
by Candillan
Massclaim vote: Yes

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 3:03 pm
by TheIrishPope
What? Oh no no, massclaim is a horrible idea. I already explained why. Candillan, why do you want massclaim?

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 4:02 pm
by Candillan
Because considering how this game will likely be only one day, it's better to massclaim rather than not. I don't think it could hurt.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 8:30 pm
by Doc Holliday
I've repeatedly explained why mass claim can ONLY hurt.

Fine. I've been outvoted. I absolutely insist it be done on a popcorn basis, and am willing to go first

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 8:53 pm
by Candillan
Who should decide, since he's already claimed.

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:36 pm
by Doc Holliday
Fair point

I strongly recommend Angel

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 10:27 am
by TheIrishPope
I'd go first, second, third, fourth, or fifth.

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 11:15 am
by Candillan
You can't go first. Who has claimed.

Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 11:22 am
by TheIrishPope
It's the spirit with which I want to do it; that's what I wanted to express :P