@GM: sorry for the late response, was sleeping. Honestly, Sakura has given more actual intelligent content in 5 or 6 posts than Notsci has given in idk how many posts.
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:56 am
by fferyllt
In post 153, Gravija wrote:@GM: sorry for the late response, was sleeping. Honestly, Sakura has given more actual intelligent content in 5 or 6 posts than Notsci has given in idk how many posts.
Is that scummy?
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:09 am
by Gravija
No, it's not that it's scummy, it's just rather irritating.
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:27 am
by fferyllt
In post 155, Gravija wrote:No, it's not that it's scummy, it's just rather irritating.
So, has anything posted in the thread so far struck you as scumny?
Well, it does read a bit like frustrated Town but that's not something that's hard to fake either.
In post 149, agi102 wrote:I am familiar with any and all strategies, but I don't remember everything about them. That's why I can't scum hunt effectively.
Just saying.
Don't worry about strategies. Just think motivation. Why do people say and do things?
In post 153, Gravija wrote:@GM: sorry for the late response, was sleeping. Honestly, Sakura has given more actual intelligent content in 5 or 6 posts than Notsci has given in idk how many posts.
Really?
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:38 am
by Gravija
@ffer: Eh, a couple of things. Not that many though.
@GM: Yeah. From my perspective, Notsci has posted absolutely NO legitimate reasoning. It's all OMGUS-esque BS and trolling from Notsci. Sakura has posted next to nothing, but at least it makes some semblance of sense.
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:55 am
by notscience
I'm kinda enjoying the constant misreps from Grav.
@Ffery, I figured it was confused town. But here's what's bugging me- While others don't give explicit reasonings, Grav is getting on my case for not (when I clearly have been) and is doing the exact thing he's calling me out for doing- He has about as many posts as me with almost 0 content, yet is like "lolnsnocontent"
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:57 am
by notscience
btw here comes the OMGUS accusation
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 8:26 am
by fferyllt
In post 158, Gravija wrote:@ffer: Eh, a couple of things. Not that many though.
@GM: Yeah. From my perspective, Notsci has posted absolutely NO legitimate reasoning. It's all OMGUS-esque BS and trolling from Notsci. Sakura has posted next to nothing, but at least it makes some semblance of sense.
What things?
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 8:31 am
by T S O
In post 129, notscience wrote:
Does anyone notice how TSO got called out for his shtick about me then instantly nakedvotes without so much as a reason on Cabd?
I called TSO out for doing something arguably scummy, then he nakedvotes! This type of unconservative play is strongly alignned with standard scum play.[/SARCASM]
In post 137, Cabd wrote:Come and play for real, TSO. Throwing out a vote on me for no stated reason is a bit low quality given your usual play as town.
Actually, my play in Newbies tends to be not-so-great. Laziness and an "unusual" (read: scummy) playstyle mean them and I don't always gel.
In post 83, agi102 wrote:Ok, so Sakura and Gravija don't understand this gambit. That's ok.
Also, link me to a game where someone has been replaced for idiocy.
Treat me like i'm five years old. Explain exactly what you hope to accomplish with this gambit of yours. How will town react? How will scum react? How do you account for false positives, and what percent chance do you feel it has of working?
Lots of players here know me as somebody who has done quite a few gambits, including claiming scum as scum, so from one gambit guy to another, tell me what you want out of this.,
In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.
In post 101, Cabd wrote:Sakura, you have until page 15 to be obvtown.
Ffery has until the end of this page to form a townbloc.
And notsci, you seem vaguely more interested in this game than some of your recent finished ones. You scum bro?
In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.
ffery/GM, thoughts on these two? Notsci, do you agree with cliche-read?
In post 137, Cabd wrote:Come and play for real, TSO. Throwing out a vote on me for no stated reason is a bit low quality given your usual play as town.
These quotes basically give me a gut feeling of scum.
It's like you're constantly using psychology to put yourself in the Town driving seat and I just get a bad feeling from it.
I don't. Not yet anyway. Do you think Cabd is scum?
Up to this post, you've been pretty opaque and non-interactive.
Another way to ask you the question I meant was: why don't you think Cabd is scum?
IME, Cabd does the narrative control thing as both (probably all) alignments. It's not alignment indicative. I am still trying to figure out what in his play
is
alignment indicative.
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:37 am
by Gravija
@ffer: Ah, I dunno, I'd have to go through the thread again to see the particular posts.
Also, @Notsci: dafuq is a misrep?
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:02 am
by goodmorning
lol
Vote: T S O
(misrep is the shorthand for misrepresent)
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:05 am
by Cabd
Just got placed on a jury. Ill be off for most of this week's afternoons at least.
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:10 am
by agi102
Cabd is obvcop (jk)
goodmorning wrote:
In post 149, agi102 wrote:I am familiar with any and all strategies, but I don't remember everything about them. That's why I can't scum hunt effectively.
Just saying.
Don't worry about strategies. Just think motivation. Why do people say and do things?
oh.
T S O wrote:
gut feeling of scum
I don't like gut votes. You have no good reason to back it up besides "I felt he was scum". We're supposed to prove they're scum, right? Using things that could or could not be sarcastic to prove scum isn't a good idea. But I don't hate them so much that I'm going to vote them. What if it's a Cop or Tracker hinting at results (but not willing to claim) anyway? But I'm not liking T S O regardless.
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:21 am
by Gravija
Cabd, you need to bold that statement. It's in the OP.
GM, what exactly is misrepresent, and/or what does it mean?
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:27 am
by agi102
Misrepresent is exactly what it looks like. You represent someone else's beliefs or actions wrongly.
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:25 pm
by Malakittens
Day 1 ends in (expired on 2013-10-04 23:50:00)
Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:27 pm
by Cabd
In post 171, Gravija wrote:Cabd, you need to bold that statement. It's in the OP.
Not if I tell the mod outside the thread. That statement was entirely meant for you guys.
