Page 7 of 208
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:23 pm
by Magua
Vote Count 1.3
With 21 alive, it takes 11 to lynch.
Lost Butterfly (5): Pyrotechnics, ProHawk, zMuffinMan, Lord Mhork, 1baldeagle1
Garuda (1): uʍop ǝpısdn
zMuffinMan (1): BBmolla
VoidedMafia (1): Lost Butterfly
1baldeagle1 (1): VoidedMafia
Harakiri (1): Harakiri
Not Voting (11): PeregrineV, Nero Cain, Seanald, guille2015, Garuda, morph the cat, Banakai, Hermy, Zdenek, DoctorPepper, Klick
Deadline for Day 1 is Saturday, October 26th, at 9:30pm EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:
(expired on 2013-10-26 20:30:00)
New deadline as of
452 is Wednesday, October 16th at 11:30am EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:
(expired on 2013-10-16 10:30:00)
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:23 pm
by ProHawk
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:24 pm
by uʍop ǝpısdn
In post 149, Pyrotechnics wrote:Oh I didn't even think of the advertising aspect, that makes it even more uncertain that $100 bid on it means it went to town.
I don't follow.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:25 pm
by zMuffinMan
because if town wanted neighbouriser they'd likely advertise for it, and therefore wouldn't be able to pay $100 for it
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:27 pm
by uʍop ǝpısdn
But Tammy just claimed that she herself wanted Neighborizer and didn't advertise it?
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:28 pm
by morph the cat
I'll let ffery talk about her reasons but for me it's around a 6 or 7.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:28 pm
by Voidedmafia
In post 133, 1baldeagle1 wrote:You obviously did not read the post. I said, I wasn't calling it fluff, I was saying it had no meaning.
Your manipulation of my words in order to vote me is cute, though.
And I said that you're using it to fluff up your case.
Your misrepresentation of my post is cute, though. (unless it's not at me, but still.)
In post 135, ProHawk wrote:Considering it was a point against someone you viewed as scummy and are currently voting for, logically, it shouldn't have looked that bad for you... at least from where I am sitting.
Your, ahem, "point" in that post was completely alignment irrelevant and reeks of trying to find a reason to paint bald as scummy.
It's possible, sure, but I don't see why that's likely right now.
I liked the feel and tone in it.
In post 136, zMuffinMan wrote:and i don't see anything particularly telling one way or another about #103. why did you think it was scummy enough to warrant a vote?
Noted above in this post.
In post 136, zMuffinMan wrote:also what happened to you thinking baldeagle was just out of his depth in a large game? that read reversed again rather quickly.
Him appearing to be out of his depths has no real relevance to my scumread on him, as it's not based on that. I meant what I said when I said that.
P-EDIT: Mina, as I said, I don't like baldeagle's push on you, which is giving me a townread on you.
Also, morph, I don't get it.
P-EDIT2: It's possible that someone else advertised for it and then another person bid all they got on Neighborizer.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:28 pm
by Lost Butterfly
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:29 pm
by Pyrotechnics
If it's not up for auction, you can't bid on it. I wanted all of the money I had to bid on what was most important to me.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:30 pm
by Harakiri
Eagle's good enough to fake that.
I don't think he did though. Likely town IMO.
Looking at others at the moment. Not trying too hard though, XY are consuming my soul.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:31 pm
by ProHawk
In post 156, Voidedmafia wrote:Your, ahem, "point" in that post was completely alignment irrelevant and reeks of trying to find a reason to paint bald as scummy.
Yeah, not alignment irrelevant when you say one thing, but don't entirely believe it yourself. Fake is as fake does.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:33 pm
by Voidedmafia
In post 160, ProHawk wrote:Yeah, not alignment irrelevant when you say one thing, but don't entirely believe it yourself. Fake is as fake does.
What?
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:33 pm
by ProHawk
Sounds like you both are scum-reading him then. You not voting is making me worry.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:33 pm
by uʍop ǝpısdn
In post 158, Pyrotechnics wrote:If it's not up for auction, you can't bid on it. I wanted all of the money I had to bid on what was most important to me.
So why can't someone else think the same?
I actually think that seeing as Faraday doesn't have it and Tammy doesn't have it, it's pretty obvious who does.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:34 pm
by BBmolla
In post 143, Lost Butterfly wrote:(Well, to add to my recent post, I find Muffin's reasons for suspecting baldeagle plausible.
Hey, BBmolla, why the fuck is your vote on Muffin, particularly since you've been calling multiple other people scum?)
Evil scheme
Or I forgot
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Lost Butterfly
Why the profanity
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:34 pm
by morph the cat
In post 158, Pyrotechnics wrote:If it's not up for auction, you can't bid on it. I wanted all of the money I had to bid on what was most important to me.
We made sure it was up for auction.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:34 pm
by Lost Butterfly
Please stop asking our slot questions. TIA.
Hey upside down, vote lord mhork. I'm a v. good scumhunter.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:35 pm
by Lost Butterfly
In post 164, BBmolla wrote: In post 143, Lost Butterfly wrote:(Well, to add to my recent post, I find Muffin's reasons for suspecting baldeagle plausible.
Hey, BBmolla, why the fuck is your vote on Muffin, particularly since you've been calling multiple other people scum?)
Evil scheme
Or I forgot
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Lost Butterfly
Why the profanity
hey mina told me she's town so if you could vote lord mhork that'd be appreciated.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:35 pm
by BBmolla
Yeah he's scum I'm just upset cause you said the f word.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:35 pm
by Lost Butterfly
In post 139, Pyrotechnics wrote:I couldn't care less whether or not you LIKE why I find you suspicious. If you know me and If you know my town self, you know that I don't think that early game suspicions have to be awesome and you push where something feels off no matter how small it may be. The first point does look like it's questioning me, so it looks really lazy on your part, and it looks like you're throwing something on me just to do it. But what really caught me as off is the calling me Empire and asking questions of Garuda, who hadn't even posted. You'd also know if you recognize me and my town game that the amount of time I pay attention to early game suspicion by other people is about *-* much, so you can't throw that against me either. It just feels off to me that you're getting all of that confused.
You do realize that my question to you about you asking Magua questions about roles is AFTER I had already voted you. So, are you faulting me for questioning you to try to determine your alignment further? Are you serious? You do understand you're the Mina who in a Westeros game asked the mod every single questions available and trapped scum day one because of that? So, yeah, for me that if you asked Magua a million questions about all the role interactions I do wonder why you didn't understand the neighborizer potential problem. If you meant why I claimed to have bid $100, why didn't you ask that. And I don't know why that's such a problem as that's how much I bid, especially when you came out and claimed how much you bid on your role. So, what's your point again?
OH. MY. GOD.
I know that Neighbourizer is a dangerous role in the hands of scum in this set-up. I really don't need to ask Magua why (and frankly, anyone who DOESN'T know why isn't scum anyway).
My point is, DON'T TELL THE SCUM WHAT POWER ROLE YOU DON'T HAVE.
"Hey, guys, I bid all my money last night, so I didn't get anything!"
That's the equivalent of claiming vanilla.
You could have still asked the neighbourizer to claim without saying that you had personally bid for the same role and lost. And frankly, that seemed really off coming from Empire (you aren't). I claimed investigation immune because it helps the town to know in whose hands the role is (even if the scum know how much money the person in whose hands it is has).
But anyway, I don't see the point in continuing this, unless it's for your own benefit. You obviously believe what you're arguing.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:36 pm
by BBmolla
I love the f word, but not when you throw it around all willy nilly.
Fuck that
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:36 pm
by Harakiri
Well done reading (And I noticed my other head already posted here too).
For now i got a strong townread on pyro, leaning town on muffin, and leaning scum on bald, voided and butterfly. Gonna talk with my other head for the time being.
Oh btw, do remember that people could have as easily offered 150 or 200 as their maximum bid for those, but they'd show up as 101 which is 1 over the second highest, it does make me wonder about the 103 and 104 ones since for that, 2nd highest would've need to be over 100.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:36 pm
by zMuffinMan
voided wrote:It's possible, sure, but I don't see why that's likely right now.
that wasn't really what i was asking. you are calling them town partially because baldeagle is attacking them. even if bussing weren't an extremely common tactic and even if you're right about baldeagle, LB could be other scum so baldeagle attacking LB shouldn't make you think LB is town just because you're scumreading baldeagle.
voided wrote:Him appearing to be out of his depths has no real relevance to my scumread on him, as it's not based on that. I meant what I said when I said that.
why did you unvote and vote prohawk? i assumed that had something to do with you changing your mind about baldeagle. apparently not.
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:37 pm
by Lost Butterfly
someone should neighbourise me : ]
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:38 pm
by BBmolla
Only if you jokingly out your buddies to me