In post 94, bazinga wrote:nobody knows what kind of doctor they are you dummy so there is no "claiming real doc"
if you were town you would know that
You think Rational's lack of setup comprehension is different? I ask because I'd like to understand why you're full on torpedo on one, and didn't really even comment on the other.
*le sigh*
did you miss where I said I think they are both scum? my vote was on rat thing.
I don't like rat thing's rolefishing i.e. "hey teh nurse shld out & we will sheep them!" post and the both of them look like pondscum at this point. do you disagree?
^This is her saying TSO and Rat are both scum. You say she's being hypocritical when she straight up isn't. So you are being dumb. I tried telling you this at the beginning .
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:57 am
by ArcAngel9
Holy shit this game.. the blame game has started already...
In post 84, penguin_alien wrote:...the point is that the more people claim Doctor, the more scum have their Nurse targets narrowed down. Since presumably the Nurse is the only one who will know what type of doc they are by the end of Night One.
right now anyone of us could be Nurse. Scum don't know that.. I would like to keep that in that way..
the less we talk about nurse, the better it is... I just hope "doctors" wont kill nurse in the night..
Bazinga.. You have my attention.. What is the plan?
every1 targets the person above them except for us, we are going to target the last person which is rat thing unless he gets lynched or jacob
Wait, why not anyone can't target you? Explain mollie.
Are you kidding me..? dont take this in personal way. Did you read the setup information from main page?
In post 109, RationalMadman wrote:Maf has no need to target the nurse. We can test some docs out on the nurse and see if among those one could kill without another saving then form there we can formulate the roles of everyone.
All this bullcrap 'OMG DO NOT LOSE OUR NL' is like crybabies.
Can anyone translate what this means? this is not in english for sure!!!
In post 117, Squirrel Girl wrote:1. No, I feel I understand that. My issue is it didn't come up the same way with Rational who, functionally, did the same thing, and I'm asking you why that is.
2. TSO has openly claimed he was trolling for reactions - why are you not giving him the same benefit of the doubt?
3. It happens. Monkey Joe still likes you though.
4. Where I was talking to Desperado and didn't make any issue with your reply turnaround time, and if I had I would have sounded insane.
I do have a paint roller, and the color appears to match your eyes. So, yeah, I'm willing to shellack on a few coats and see what happens.
Vote: Bazinga
For paint!
Your wrong Squirrel. You can't compare the way mollie reacted to Rat and T S O. Rat is derp, TSO is not. so I see why mollie wanted to pressure TSO, how are you applying her actions are any different to what you have done? If your only argument is about "RAT", you might want to re-consider it.. Did you pay attention to RAT play.. it make no sense to me.
In post 132, Squirrel Girl wrote:So your big question was, basically, 'are you scum?'.
You're annoying, I'll be happy when you're dead and I don't even care what alignment you are.
now you're being rude too, How does lynching someone over anger is helpful to the town. This is very anti-town attitude.
And I need more inputs from other players... especially Jacob and shaos..
Pretty much town so far..
Despo (that's typical town him)
Bazinga (its town mollie )
RAT, please make yourself useful
TSO & Despo, who do you think is scum?
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:01 am
by Malakittens
Meredith: Dr. Shepherd.
Derek: Dr. Shepherd? This morning I was Derek, now it's Dr. Shepherd.
Meredith: Dr. Shepherd, we should pretend it never happened.
Derek: What never happened? You sleeping with me last night? Or you throwing me out this morning? Because both are fond memories I'd like to hang on to.
Meredith: No, there will be no more memories. I'm not the girl in the bar anymore and you're not the guy. This can't exist. You get that, right?
Derek: You took advantage of me and now you want to forget it?
Meredith: I did not take—
Derek: I was drunk, vulnerable and good looking and you took advantage.
Meredith: Okay, I was the one who was drunk and you are NOT that good looking.
Derek: Maybe not today, but last night I was very good looking. I had on my red shirt, my good looking shirt and you took advantage.
Meredith: I did not!
Derek: Would you like to take advantage again, say Friday night?
Meredith: No! You're an attending and I'm your intern! Stop looking at me like that.
Derek: Like what?
Meredith: Like you've seen me naked.
His partner is TBD. What are you thinking right now?
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:03 am
by Squirrel Girl
In post 148, bazinga wrote:where did either of them admit to trolling. I am *guessing* that rat thing is
TSO did it here;
In post 87, T S O wrote:I'm obviously not so bad I'd claim real Doctor. The whole post was obviously bullshit.
You're right that Rational didn't.
In post 148, bazinga wrote:and since you are making a thing of it where did tso admit to trolling before I voted him?
The quote above is him admitting it before you voted him.
In post 149, Desperado wrote:She wasn't letting go of anything. Looks to me like she thought they were both scum. No?
Well, she let Rational go to at least a second top scumread when she promoted TSO to the top. She also got off a 3 vote wagon to make a 3 vote wagon, so it's not like she was going for the bigger wagon either. She didn't mention how Rational had done the same thing when she moved, didn't mention him at all. It was an odd shift to put someone in the top scum spot over someone else when she seems to admit they're both doing the same thing. That reads unhappy to me - I'm still not sure why you're okay with it.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:07 am
by Squirrel Girl
In post 150, Desperado wrote:^This is her saying TSO and Rat are both scum. You say she's being hypocritical when she straight up isn't. So you are being dumb. I tried telling you this at the beginning .
She's doing that after I flat out asked her why she was choosing one over the other. At that stage she already knows the angle I'm calling her scummy over and, in my opinion, is saying that to cover her tracks. I feel like if she really had believed this the whole time that she would have indicated so when she moved votes or even at an earlier point instead of just getting catty with me.
In post 151, ArcAngel9 wrote:Your wrong Squirrel. You can't compare the way mollie reacted to Rat and T S O. Rat is derp, TSO is not. so I see why mollie wanted to pressure TSO, how are you applying her actions are any different to what you have done? If your only argument is about "RAT", you might want to re-consider it.. Did you pay attention to RAT play.. it make no sense to me.
I am not really sure what you are asking me here or how you think my play is no different from Bazinga's play (which, would probably annoy her to hear). Can you explain this a bit, I don't know what you're saying.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:15 am
by Desperado
In post 154, Squirrel Girl wrote:It was an odd shift to put someone in the top scum spot over someone else when she seems to admit they're both doing the same thing. That reads unhappy to me - I'm still not sure why you're okay with it.
You're not sure why I'm OK with bazinga voting multiple people?
In post 154, Squirrel Girl wrote:It was an odd shift to put someone in the top scum spot over someone else when she seems to admit they're both doing the same thing. That reads unhappy to me - I'm still not sure why you're okay with it.
You're not sure why I'm OK with bazinga voting multiple people?
I feel like that is a straw man of what I'm saying. What I'm not sure about is why the transition looks okay to you when it looks so bad to me. I understand that after I pressed her on it she answered with a explanation, and I also think I showed why that explanation feels contrived and not in line with what she did. At what point am I losing you? And what evidence/thoughts do you use to escape my thought process and arrive at your conclusion?
Because I found what she did to be scummy. I've explained the particulars multiple times over the last few pages, but if you'd like I can run through them again.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:23 am
by penguin_alien
AA9, bazinga/mollie is the first player on the list. There's no one above her, so she doubles back to the bottom of the list for her target assignment under this plan.
I'm happy to lynch TSO or Rational Madman at this point. Anti-town behavior is either a liability or scum pretending, and since neither is brand new I think it's coming from scum.
Squirrel Girl, meh. Feels like arguing to argue, not my first priority.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:32 am
by RationalMadman
I am the naive doc
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:33 am
by RationalMadman
nurse should out and lead idiots
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:38 am
by bazinga
I hope the person below us is a vig.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:42 am
by bazinga
@ squirrelly girl
you wanted a no-lynch at the start of the game
and never volunteered an authentic progression as to why you suddenly want to lynch somebody
lets start here
start answering my damn questions
@arc
I was ninja-ed by penny. the person below us targets us.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:10 am
by T S O
1 post and I'm being anti-town and deserve an auto-lynch. 1 post.
I'm starting to think Desp is scum because he knows how I play and he wouldn't auto-lynch me as Town.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:12 am
by bazinga
In post 164, T S O wrote:1 post and I'm being anti-town and deserve an auto-lynch. 1 post.
I'm starting to think Desp is scum because he knows how I play and he wouldn't auto-lynch me as Town.
what do you have to offer other than a narcissistic view of the game
Mostly I wanted to discuss it, but yes, I advanced that plan.
In post 163, bazinga wrote:and never volunteered an authentic progression as to why you suddenly want to lynch somebody
I was shown an alternate plan that had worked and embraced it - I didn't need much progression because it's not like I was advocating my plan beyond the discussion stage.
In post 154, Squirrel Girl wrote:It was an odd shift to put someone in the top scum spot over someone else when she seems to admit they're both doing the same thing. That reads unhappy to me - I'm still not sure why you're okay with it.
You're not sure why I'm OK with bazinga voting multiple people?
I feel like that is a straw man of what I'm saying. What I'm not sure about is why the transition looks okay to you when it looks so bad to me. I understand that after I pressed her on it she answered with a explanation, and I also think I showed why that explanation feels contrived and not in line with what she did. At what point am I losing you? And what evidence/thoughts do you use to escape my thought process and arrive at your conclusion?
Because I found what she did to be scummy. I've explained the particulars multiple times over the last few pages, but if you'd like I can run through them again.
Okay, Go on... but keep it simple
In post 159, penguin_alien wrote:AA9, bazinga/mollie is the first player on the list. There's no one above her, so she doubles back to the bottom of the list for her target assignment under this plan.
I'm happy to lynch TSO or Rational Madman at this point. Anti-town behavior is either a liability or scum pretending, and since neither is brand new I think it's coming from scum.
Squirrel Girl, meh. Feels like arguing to argue, not my first priority.
I doubt if that logic works... we have doctors who don't know who they are..so we will have to target some or other on night beccuz if we don't we might end up dying..