Page 7 of 64
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:22 am
by Yates
In post 139, Thor665 wrote:I'd feel better about that if I felt you were doing anything else.
It's early. And I am. I'm just being way more subtle about it. Besides, even if I wasn't there's a big difference between being a low contributor in the early game and being a nuisance.
I've already gleaned the information required. Perhaps look at some of the posts following this question. More to come on this in a bit.
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:32 am
by Yates
In post 140, Bulbazak wrote:Is me being aggressive while hunting scum hurting your mojo? I'd hate to see how you'd handle Majiffy, Kuribo, or even Fate.
Nope. I've played with all of them and enjoyed the games. Anyway, that was a reaction fish. I'm satisfied with your response. Now I have to do a little more digging to see if you respond this way more as scum or town.
In post 140, Bulbazak wrote:I'm referring specifically to Thor's pushes on Slandaar and Mollie in Maniacal Streets Mafia.
Yeah. Uhh. I'm way too busy watching the Olympics and - you know - living my life to read that whole game. Can you summarize in like three easy to link posts from his ISO?
Adequately answered above?
On Day 1? Why not. Of greater import - what makes you think Zek is "bad town" and not just scum?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:13 am
by Smudger
But then my question was not about Zek more a generalisation based on how I read your posts, you and Bro that is. So If you want to talk about Zek in particular he is just bad regardless of alignment,
Zek what do you hope to achieve with you Thor fetish?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:33 am
by zakk
In post 37, XScorpion wrote:Zekrom25 wrote:we aren't in RVS anymore please re-read post # 33
Lynch all liars guys.
Maybe he thought RVS ended between those two posts which you
quoted out of order
... ever think of that?
Vote: Xscorpion
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 7:01 am
by BROseidon
In post 122, smargaret wrote:Broseidon - how do you expect to do that when anti-town players aren't doing anything? You motivate them to do something - anything - right?
True
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:03 am
by Zekrom25
In post 152, Smudger wrote:But then my question was not about Zek more a generalisation based on how I read your posts, you and Bro that is. So If you want to talk about Zek in particular he is just bad regardless of alignment,
Zek what do you hope to achieve with you Thor fetish?
i was asking questions directed to Thor to try to get a read
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:47 am
by Porkens
In post 153, zakk wrote: In post 37, XScorpion wrote:Zekrom25 wrote:we aren't in RVS anymore please re-read post # 33
Lynch all liars guys.
Maybe he thought RVS ended between those two posts which you
quoted out of order
... ever think of that?
Vote: Xscorpion
Oh hi zekroms partner
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:05 pm
by Zekrom25
In post 156, Porkens wrote: In post 153, zakk wrote: In post 37, XScorpion wrote:Zekrom25 wrote:we aren't in RVS anymore please re-read post # 33
Lynch all liars guys.
Maybe he thought RVS ended between those two posts which you
quoted out of order
... ever think of that?
Vote: Xscorpion
Oh hi zekroms partner
a national icon like me is confirmed town
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:17 pm
by zakk
I'm not anybody's partner.
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:21 pm
by Porkens
SK then?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:55 pm
by cxinlee
Smargeret:
Post content or don't post, but posting just for the sake of hearing yourself type
What does this mean?
Have opinions. Express them
I already expressed all (or at least most) of my opinions
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:38 pm
by Thor665
In post 142, Zekrom25 wrote:mild & in control of my emotions, i also like to be a public figure & helpful when needed
You find that more informative than 'Slightly annoyed and bugged by bad play?
That's basically an identical level of information - how am I stymieing you here - specifically?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:38 pm
by Zekrom25
@Thor it provides information that i am town
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:05 pm
by Thor665
In post 161, Thor665 wrote:That's basically an identical level of information - how am I stymieing you here - specifically?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:43 pm
by Smudger
In post 156, Porkens wrote: In post 153, zakk wrote: In post 37, XScorpion wrote:Zekrom25 wrote:we aren't in RVS anymore please re-read post # 33
Lynch all liars guys.
Maybe he thought RVS ended between those two posts which you
quoted out of order
... ever think of that?
Vote: Xscorpion
Oh hi zekroms partner
My thought exactly when I read that
Zek, you may have thought you answered my question but you did not. What is you aim should Thor answer your questions? To be frank they are somewhat weird. For one exactly what do you get from Thors emotional state and how does that help you in this game?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:43 pm
by Bulbazak
In post 151, Yates wrote:
In post 140, Bulbazak wrote:I'm referring specifically to Thor's pushes on Slandaar and Mollie in Maniacal Streets Mafia.
Yeah. Uhh. I'm way too busy watching the Olympics and - you know - living my life to read that whole game. Can you summarize in like three easy to link posts from his ISO?
You know what, I was going to link you directly to his ISO, but mafiascum doesn't want to play nice, and I just spent an hour trying to get it to work. I gave you the link to the game. Quit being lazy and ISO Thor yourself, since just 3 quotes won't do it justice. The fun starts somewhere around #1200. Long story short, he got after Mollie because she called him grumpy and then accused her of dodging him. He also gets into another argument with Slandaar. Both essentially turned into semantic arguments.
@Zednek: Why aren't you answering my question?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:48 pm
by Zekrom25
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:50 pm
by Bulbazak
It's nice that you are asking questions and all, but you're not answering mine. How is Thor not helpful?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:05 pm
by smargaret
Thor - what's the difference between lynchbait and low-hanging fruit? Specifically re: your reply to me about cxin and your reply to Yates about Zek. I'd quote, but ipads are annoying and I don't feel like switching to the real computer.
Porkens - Do you still think Thor and Bulbazak are scum? Do you think Zek is scum with them? Why?
Bulbazak, though - I don't know that I'd call it a flinch per se, but definitely overly defensive. Do not like.
Zakk - anything else to say? Because calling someone out around one post when we have seven pages of actual stuff to go on (as opposec to questions about emotional state) and then nothing else? That's a bit fence sitty.
cxin - It means don't active lurk. If you're going to post, respond to the thread or actually draw conclusions, don't just post "OHAI, I'm here, nothing to say!". If you don't have an opinion, reread the thread and develop one. What is your read on Zek? In fact, who are your top three scumreads and why?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:09 pm
by Zekrom25
In post 167, Bulbazak wrote:It's nice that you are asking questions and all, but you're not answering mine. How is Thor not helpful?
i was trying to get a read from Thor
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:13 am
by Porkens
In post 168, smargaret wrote:Porkens - Do you still think Thor and Bulbazak are scum? Do you think Zek is scum with them? Why?
That's an interesting question. I don't know if Thor is scum. I'm not interested in lynching him today. However, if he is scum, I would say it could very well be with Bulb for that silliness in the beginning of the day. However, if they are normally like this with each other, then meh.
Is Bulb scum? Again, I'm not sure. He is full of shit and very defensive, that I'm sure of. After our our spat and a couple of days ignoring his posts, however, I'm actually ok with working with him to lynch the people who are flat out not helping. We can always go back to arguing about false dichotomies later.
Is Zek scum with either of them? Proooobably not? If he is, they are privately having a fit at how badly he is representing himself. Zek falls into the classic slot of being super too obvious. It reminds me of Fleur de Lis in Grimm mafia a million years ago.
Zakk is a riddle to me. His first post ignored everything else in the game to defend Zek. Why in the world would town or scum do that? As Zek's partner, maybe he's just that straight forward? Or as Thor's partner, maybe he is trying to distance? But why would scum make themselves so obvious? I dunno. Out of everything that was going on, why zoom in on that? It doesn't make sense, kill it.
While I'm at it, I'll just comment on the rest of the player list...
Yates - I really like his unpretentious and straightforward posting. Useful.
T S O - hasn't posted yet?
smargaret - Asking questions without giving opinions?
Yiley - hasn't posted yet?
Smudger - I get a town vibe from him, mostly gut but also criticizing the dick fight seems pro-town.
cxinlee - very strange. Not only doesn't have opinions, but also doesn't seem interested in forming any. Maybe he just likes to watch if you know what I mean wink wink.
XScorpion - Saved me from raging out earlier, so I have a soft spot for him ATM.
BROseidon - hasn't posted anything memorable or particularly useful
Yates
Smudger
Thor665
XScorpion
Bulbazak
smargaret
BROseidon
Zekrom25
zakk
cxinlee
T S O
Yiley
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:18 am
by cxinlee
Ill go into this later.
Porkens could you define opinion?
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 5:18 am
by Thor665
In post 168, smargaret wrote:Thor - what's the difference between lynchbait and low-hanging fruit? Specifically re: your reply to me about cxin and your reply to Yates about Zek. I'd quote, but ipads are annoying and I don't feel like switching to the real computer.
Really?
Now I need to do research and, possibly, interpretation to answer a question that already seems silly?
Okay, let's see what happens...Iso time!
In post 117, Thor665 wrote:Cxin is certainly either scum or lynchbait - but the reason lynchbait is lynchbait is because it's reasonable to lynch it, and the inherent act of not liking Cxin's play thus far is hardly anti-town.
In post 134, Thor665 wrote:@Yates - low hanging fruit is low hanging because it's sloppy at the game, I thought. When did it become alignment indicative?
I'm pretty sure these are the posts in question.
I'm not sure what's conflicting or confusing here.
I'll clarify that I consider "lynchbait" and "low hanging fruit" to mean, functionally, the same thing.
I have no idea the point of this question.
Clarify?
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:04 am
by Porkens
no!
Don't try to drag this into the worst semantic argument in history. Do one of the following:
1. Say "no, fuck you porkers; I
have
given opinions, and here they are: <quote>"
2. Turn you life around, give some opinions, and discuss the actual things happening in the game
3. Gently accept the rope
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:09 am
by Thor665
That's actually the most pro-town Prokens has sounded all game.
Meh - town pool.