Mafiascum.net

Jordan is under my protection now, I will not have him questioned.

In post 140, Titus wrote:Fate, I have heard a lot about you but never had the pleasure. Describe yourself please.

Jordan, the automated vote counter isn't coded by the hosts but by a third party who gives the hosts a link during the testing phase. Don't blame the mod.

I am your white knight, at your service *bows*

I am your god

I am the avatar of rage and freedom

silly undo
there is no one named CDB in this game; the mod said so
besides I already provided reasons explaining why ChannelDelibird is terrible

also i already explained why freak is town — all suspicion of him is built on a misunderstanding and his posts are actually quite fluid; you're more probably scum than he is, which might explain why you're still treating him like a viable lynch

i will provide a more thorough explanation if either his wagon gets too big or i desperately need someone on the wagon to vote intelligently before deadline but talking about doc doesn't cut it

seriously everyone my wallpost earlier was not filler but a mission statement
most everything i do until the next mission statement can be explained by that mission statement
im going to now repeat all of the questions I've asked so far that haven't been answered
and then maybe call everyone here terrible again

what i see in fate is not really substance, but an art form, an expression of affective intensity
by his model, our world may burn down, leaving nothing but salt and ash
but at the moment of collapse we just might observe the embodiment of beauty, a flash of meaning in a wholly absurd world
it is my duty to humor this opportunity at least long enough to apprehend the contours of good and evil within each of us
in the contours of our avatars,
the punctuation-lite epithets of our posts,
the irregular timing of our hammer-votes —
by descending partially into chaos, i might arise with clarity in hand

...

In post 149, Freak wrote: Nat: is this the culture shock you were talking about?

I don't know what exactly Natirasha was referring to, but if the current fashionable playstyle is to goof around, I am definitely shocked.

Wow that's the best post I've seen in a long time

I'd say you've given me hope for the new generation of players but wtf is this 2009 join date and where have you been all my life

In post 135, Aegor wrote:Still feeling awesome about my Doc vote.

@NicCage: Reads please. Why are you still voting me?

Because I love you and it makes me feel closer to you

In post 40, Doc Holliday wrote:.CDB is putting clear effort into sorting the good from the bad, and right away spotted a cognitive dissonance that I missed. That is not how scum tend to think, their cases tend to be built slowly and carefully, because they have to think about it more.

Dumb. It's easy to ask a question about anything, especially something that doesn't matter. You look like you're making up things.

In post 78, Doc Holliday wrote:

In post 75, Aegor wrote:You're aware that waiting a couple of pages to say "Oh my god! You suck!" doesn't make it less scummy, right? You're also committing

exactly

the same scummy sin that CDB initially called you out for - seeing something, going on about something else, then going back and saying "You know what, my vote should be

here

, even though I didn't think it warranted it right away." That kind of calculated sophistry does not scream Town.

This must be directed at Jordan and not Aegor, but it still doesn't really fit what happened. This looks made up, and like he's trying to discredit anyone who's voting him.

To the people that have been saying I have bad reasoning, or haven't explained, or whatever else, fuck you. I explained well my solid reads perfectly well. Jordan is scummy for trying to build cases on people out of thin air, early nervous votehopping, and

really

bad reactions to being voted, CDB is probably Town for demonstrating a logical, discerning thought process, and Aegor is getting scummier for cognitive dissonance. Everyone else is too weak a read to bother with.

Grrrr mad Doc. Building cases out of thin air is kinda what happens at the start of the game, but I would like to know exactly what you're referring to.
I like how it's nervous votehopping though I fail to see how nervous applies to the situation. Votehopping is probably better than not since it helps keep the game moving. So why is it scummy?
Also what really bad reactions? And why they're bad.

Doc Holliday's reasoning feels fake and his attempt to discredit the people voting him looks scummy.
VOTE: Doc

There were other things I noticed, but I don't have time to get to them right now. Hopefully later.

I can't help but notice the pace of this game. Jordan you need to calm the fuck down.

I don't think JK (Fate) is that scummy seeing as he replaced out and that his most recent posts have all been in this game. Guy was telling the truth for sure.

- I don't know how new Freak is but I'm not convinced that he's scum. His play seems better than what I'd expect from someone new.
---

Aegor wrote:Still feeling awesome about my Doc vote.

@NicCage: Reads please. Why are you still voting me?

This post is too epic. Why did you feel the need to make it? Also, please don't act like you cared about Nic's reads; you only cared that his vote was still on you.
VOTE: Aegor

Btw Freak, that wasn't aimed at you. Forgot to get rid of the ""

Make it @Undo seeing as he wanted that answer.
---

In post 150, Fate wrote:Jordan is under my protection now, I will not have him questioned.

What does one have to do to be under your protection?
---

and you are doing the reverse of what you are attacking nat of doing... which happens to be equally bad.
why the shift. Seems unprovoked and with no justification.

Nat's play doesn't look like scum to me. She doesn't seem to care about trying to look town at all.
Not saying her play is good; it sucks hard.
---
- I think you need to stop voting JK (Fate) and vote Aegor.

Also, no offense Nat.

NicCage+CDB

one more scum to catch

In post 158, absta101 wrote:Also, please don't act like you cared about Nic's reads; you only cared that his vote was still on you.
VOTE: Aegor

Harsh much? Forgive me for asking someone who has posted nothing of value to post something of value. And way to incorrectly infer my motives.

Epic much?
I guess you're going to ask Slandaar for his reads next?

Right after Slandaar votes you for this shit.

In post 144, Slandaar wrote:Sorry I was really busy on the weekend will actually contribute later.

I will definitely ask him, unless he contributes now that the weekend is over.

In post 166, Aegor wrote:

In post 144, Slandaar wrote:Sorry I was really busy on the weekend will actually contribute later.

I will definitely ask him, unless he contributes now that the weekend is over.

Ahhh okay, so you were waiting for him to come back from his busy weekend. That explains why you didn't ask him before post 144.

Yep.

By the way, I think you are looking for a consistency in treatment of other players that will never come from my end, at least as evenly as you are expecting.

In post 162, Fate wrote:NicCage+CDB

one more scum to catch

no
So you like Doc?

In post 108, Titus wrote: 6) Slandaar, naked voting... umm what? No.. this ain't Death's Diner Slandaar... meta sucks but hey it's what I got so far.

VOTE: Slandaar

Metas

I obviously could get more but that game finished literally today; I naked vote as town therefore as scum I have to do it too. One could (somewhat) argue I played more to my town meta than scum meta there anyways due to my unorthodox role.

I find the argument incredibly weak and very hard to believe you could believe this to actually be any kind of meta tell as I would have to be REALLY bad for it to be one.

In post 164, absta101 wrote:Epic much?
I guess you're going to ask Slandaar for his reads next?

No need, Jordan already did that.

In post 165, absta101 wrote:Right after Slandaar votes you for this shit.

What?

OK this is why Doc is scum the simple version;

In post 29, Doc Holliday wrote:I thought Jordan was kidding at first, or maybe newTown, but votehopping like that

Votehopping argument made on page 2, it was terrible then but eh one could say it was made to try and progress things which is OK if that were the intention, however...

In post 78, Doc Holliday wrote: early nervous votehopping

It is a mainstay.

Votehopping isn't a tell to begin with but accusing someone of it in RVS is actually just laughable and his posts just read completely manufactured cramming as many buzzwords into them as possible its just nonsense. He is clearly just making up content and attempting to make it sound good (the votehopping argument shows buzzword -> terrible actual argument).

*shurg*. I still read freaks posts as trying to look town and trying to figure out what the town want.

is there any good reason you fucks are refusing to lynch scum?