Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:49 am
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Read over my discussion with Mac I'm 99% sure we have already covered all these questions, if you still don't get everything after then ask away, but I'm certain I've already answered this.In post 155, sangres wrote:Why do naked votes encourage wagons?
Don't care, answer it again.In post 159, PhDScar wrote:Read over my discussion with Mac I'm 99% sure we have already covered all these questions, if you still don't get everything after then ask away, but I'm certain I've already answered this.In post 155, sangres wrote:Why do naked votes encourage wagons?
This isn't an answer.In post 144, PhDScar wrote:They aren't I didn't say they were. What I was saying was that that naked vote could of easily lead to a wagon and been very beneficial to scum. I would appreciate more votes on ActionDan right about now guys.In post 141, Mac wrote:In post 132, PhDScar wrote:I meant it was still opportunistic by the way. I think I got the language screwed up in the first sentence.
I think it could get people to pile votes because it was early, and people like to wagon early, also it could seem like a legitimate vote at first glance. Hence me say "tempting" which still seems to be lost on people.
Why are early wagons bad, doctor?
Are talking the maso-lover-otherrandomjunk-thingy? Because I thought that was a joke.In post 157, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:Scar: If you're concerned about an opportunistic wagon occuring, what do you think of the one that is happening on the claimed PR?
No matter what one it is, you are still my strongest scum read and I think you need more votes.In post 158, ActionDan wrote:Is your decisive read on me in the same vein as your decisive read on k dub scar?
updatedIn post 82, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:sangres (fferyllt + Nachomamma8)
PhDScar
Mac
ActionDan
Aegor
HighShroomish
SMP
catboi
Kdub
BROseidon
Aj The Epic
Jake From State Farm
enjoy this complementary mara post as I take my leave
WHY ARE YOU YELLING AT ME WHEN I SAID I WOULD POST WHEN I GOT HOME?In post 153, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:JAKE WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THE OTHER QUESTION
This isn't really an answer.In post 132, PhDScar wrote:I meant it was still opportunistic by the way. I think I got the language screwed up in the first sentence.
I think it could get people to pile votes because it was early, and people like to wagon early, also it could seem like a legitimate vote at first glance. Hence me say "tempting" which still seems to be lost on people.
Scars a strange one. I think I'll put him as scummy at this point.In post 120, sangres wrote:It felt like a long time.In post 117, Mac wrote:I just wondered the reasoning behind this question?
In post 97, sangres wrote:Why did it take you so long to come up with that response?
Who else would you vote?In post 169, ActionDan wrote:Scars a strange one. I think I'll put him as scummy at this point.In post 120, sangres wrote:It felt like a long time.In post 117, Mac wrote:I just wondered the reasoning behind this question?
In post 97, sangres wrote:Why did it take you so long to come up with that response?
Mac is a fair townread.
I didn't realize this was directed at me, but I'm not sure what kind of response you expected. I'm don't even have a case, it's based off my gut read.In post 122, sangres wrote:Although I did sort of hope for some kind of response to this.In post 115, sangres wrote:I think your case is probably bad but I think you know that.
Why are you assuming that? Bert had nothing to do with the timing of my voteIn post 126, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:and, if my post was the reason you have your vote on us, why did it take for bert to say something for the vote to get dropped in the first place?
