↑gameplay506 wrote:This makes me feel like insanity is kinda confused on the cult part:
↑insanity018 wrote:Completely ignoring that ika situation which had just happened in order to make fairly non-substantial comments. Leaning scum.
Ika was cult alone. Thus ignoring the ika situation doesn't make him scum. And also he kinda soft claimed a few posts ago you can go, read his post and unvote him.
Didn't think of this, but he did completely ignore it like it wasn't there. However I still like Baezu's 117 a lot.
↑gameplay506 wrote:I don't hide that I encouraged the wagon. Such a fast and early developed wagon out of RVS is guaranteed to have scum on it.
Agreed
↑gameplay506 wrote:Overall I like insanity's post.
Agreed as well, it really speaks well to me.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:42 pm
by Flames682
↑gameplay506 wrote:And don't confuse roleblocking with roleSTOPPING.
The difference being what?
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:10 pm
by Mr_Ree
Semi VLA for the next week due to a death in the family.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:14 pm
by Baezu
Sorry to hear that Ree. Hope you're doing ok
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:33 pm
by Mr_Ree
I will be. Just need to get my head straight. Gimme a few days.
↑insanity018 wrote:Completely ignoring that ika situation which had just happened in order to make fairly non-substantial comments. Leaning scum.
Ika was cult alone. Thus ignoring the ika situation doesn't make him scum. And also he kinda soft claimed a few posts ago you can go, read his post and unvote him.
The point is that if something unusual happens, it would be more of a scum/mafia thing to avoid commenting about it. So that they don't say anything contentious which might make them look scummy.
↑insanity018 wrote:I am definitely wary of the way Flames (81 ) and Lynx ( 89 ) jumped onto the ika wagon. Nullish for now as I am often paranoid of people who blatantly sheep but will be watching what else they do in the future.
You could say it's a sheep, but not really. I voted him because I thought massclaim was a bad idea as well. Everyone else had already pointed that out so there was no need to explain why it was a bad idea like everyone else had.
Did you have any concerns about how fast the wagon had built up?
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2014 8:35 pm
by insanity018
VOTE: Flames
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:52 am
by Rob14
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:56 am
by gameplay506
Flames682 wrote:
↑gameplay506 wrote:And don't confuse roleblocking with roleSTOPPING.
The difference being what?
Rolestopping stops every ability that targets the rolestopped player. For example if I chose to rolestop shos and vezok chose to vanillarize him, vezok's ability would of failed. Or maybe of I rolestopped shos and somebody tried to cult him, the cult-ing would have failed.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:56 am
by gameplay506
↑Mr_Ree wrote:@Gameplay: What is your previous experience with Vezok? Why did you react (favorably?) to his vote on you?
I didn't think much of the RVS vote. Also I was sarcastic back then
I have played one game with him. I was reallly trolly and bad but eh he wasn't any better.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 5:01 am
by Baezu
Good point at the end of post 155. It puts that post from flame in a different light
↑insanity018 wrote:I am definitely wary of the way Flames (81 ) and Lynx ( 89 ) jumped onto the ika wagon. Nullish for now as I am often paranoid of people who blatantly sheep but will be watching what else they do in the future.
You could say it's a sheep, but not really. I voted him because I thought massclaim was a bad idea as well. Everyone else had already pointed that out so there was no need to explain why it was a bad idea like everyone else had.
Did you have any concerns about how fast the wagon had built up?
Wasn't really thinking about it at the time. Looking back I see that I was the fifth vote when I thought I was like the 3rd vote. But yes, I see your point on how fast it built up straight after RVS. As gameplay said, a lynch right out of RVS has scum on it guaranteed.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:44 pm
by Rob14
Knight of Cydonia has been prodded.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:50 pm
by insanity018
Flames, your vote looked super opportunistic.
And, I don't like your posts, which are filled with "Agreed" "Good point" fluff.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:27 pm
by Klazam
k I'm posting now. don't wanna flake on this game, esp not after a start like that.
A couple people is calling me conftown. i don't get it and i don't like it. in my experience, the people most eager to put people on the conftown list often turn out to be scum.
Who: Why the fuck are you voting gameplay?
Regarding VCA- not much can be learned right now. we need more than 1 lynchwagon to draw any kind of conclusions from VCA.
right now, the people I'm worried about who was on ika's wagon is those who jumped on solely for "hur durr mass claim bad"
I said a sk was also possible next to a vig. why are you (I forget who) so determined that it is a sk? Flavor means nothing- we're all insane in this asylum after all BWAHAHAH. K that was over the top, what i mean is that we al have psychological conditions. its easy to tie either a vig or a sk to that flavor given that. Lemme look at who said the above. thats who my vote is on.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:32 pm
by Klazam
Who- i missed your post. disregard my question. What do you think of gameplay in light of his claim?
also damit gameplay, tont be dumb. see my point above. i can't vote you atm, because your claim and the posts leading to it seems genuine.
Everyone else has already explained why massclaim is a bad idea so I don't need to again
VOTE: ika
And don't try to claim roleblocker to see who CC's you.
insanity018 wrote:Flames, your vote looked super opportunistic.
And, I don't like your posts, which are filled with "Agreed" "Good point" fluff.
Insanity speaks what i want to say here. look to the insane for the truth.
vote Flames
this is where i want to be here i think.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 6:46 pm
by Who
↑gameplay506 wrote:Um who I never actually voted ika. And I said that the wagon was going to be useful simply because it developed fast as hell and nobody even thougt/hesitated about it.
Sorry about that, for some reason I thought you did in the same post where you said his lynch was fine because it would lead us to scum.
If you thought the wagon was odd, then why not try and defend him/attack the wagon yesterday rather than simply letting it slide and saying "we'll get scum tomorrow"?
@Klazam
I don't think it changes anything. An unverifiable vanilla-ized role. The way in which he did it did feel town, but the way he's been acting apart from that detracts from it. He has a certain confidence which doesn't seem as if it would come from town. The roleclaim could have been an attempt to gain excess towniepoints to then give credence to his confidence.
↑ZZZX wrote:ok now anyway its true but it wasnt a lose to get rid of the cult d1. I dont trust cults enough to let it live
I don't understand the first sentence of this quote.
If I know who is cult and even if cult might help us vs mafia I can never trust cult to survive. If I can get rid of cult as soon as possible I will always do so.
Just like in Mafia reb. You cant let werewolfs live even if they might help vs mafia
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:12 pm
by insanity018
^Do you have any thoughts about the actual game?
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:34 pm
by ZZZX
Not yet honestly
I didnt even get to play d1.../
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 10:34 pm
by Knight of Cydonia
Responding to prod because I'm an idiot who forgot to tell mod I would be V/LA for most of Friday/Saturday.
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 6:57 am
by Baezu
I think flames is a good vote because he hadn't really been contributing anything of value and his last post was pretty bad. Maybe pressure will help
VOTE: flames
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2014 10:55 am
by gameplay506
↑Who wrote:If you thought the wagon was odd, then why not try and defend him/attack the wagon yesterday rather than simply letting it slide and saying "we'll get scum tomorrow"?
Actually I fought against it. Well ye it wasn't much of a fight but basically I thought he was a VI so it was a win-win situation.
