Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 3:16 pm
ego
In post 58, Ircher wrote:You draw scum 20% of the time.In post 53, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I have a wikiIn post 52, Ircher wrote:You know who is though? RC.In post 50, MagnaofIllusion wrote:No, you aren't. You know you aren't so stop puffing out your chest like Big Bad Leroy Brown.In post 47, drmyshottyizsik wrote:I'm harder to read than... well something hard to read.
Pedit: And how often you draw scum?
All the more likely you are scum.
In post 60, Ircher wrote:Whatever, theoretical != practical probability. Some people are lucky, others arent.
In post 62, Ircher wrote:Besides, the probabilities are weighted.
In post 64, Ircher wrote:Cuz there is a higher chance of rolling town then scum, duh!
But, next topic.
In post 68, Ircher wrote:Out of 65 games, you've been scum 18 times: 27.6%.
In 9p, yes, its 22% chance of scum.
In 13p, its 23%.
Your score, 27.6% is quite a bit on the high end. So, yes, experimentally, you are more often scum than normal.
ITT: We learn that Ircher failed StatsIn post 71, Ircher wrote:Normal --> 23% chance of scum. You: 28% chance of scum. 28 > 23 by 5 points.
Not even close. It's the way you danced around it twice.In post 152, Killthestory wrote:i honestly don't understand egg.
like telling you I'm town apparently has to mean I'm town rite?
my connection timed out at the airport (we only get 2hrs to play around here in europe apparently) so you are getting the reaction delayed but:In post 122, Titus wrote:You realize how Copper has displayed actual inconsistencies and people are pushing awkard things you are saying because they don't like math. Get real.
Primarily because in this post, he is setting himself up to vote for both Shotty/Ircher as opposed to taking one side. It looks like he's trying really hard to agree with both players at the same time.In post 102, TehBrawlGuy wrote:The whole statistics discussion is stupid and doesn't read natural. Feels like a poor attempt at distancing to me, as does Ircher's "go vote shotty". VOTE: Ircher
Copper case has no real merit imo. Copper had no reason to unvote/vote anyone else, but also no reason to actually believe Ircher was more likely to be scum than anyone else at the time.
Is there anything else that points to Copper being scum to you other than the inconsistency you pointed out near the beginning? I don't exactly townread Copper, but I don't buy your reasoning as a solid reason to vote for him.In post 158, Titus wrote:I could go there but my read there would be conditioned on Copper scum most likely.?
I am interacting w Copper but as of now, his trajectory is crap.In post 162, projectmatt wrote:Is there anything else that points to Copper being scum to you other than the inconsistency you pointed out near the beginning? I don't exactly townread Copper, but I don't buy your reasoning as a solid reason to vote for him.In post 158, Titus wrote:I could go there but my read there would be conditioned on Copper scum most likely.?
In general I think RVS is an opportunity to try and get a read on someone that can be easily read, on someone you know well, or on someone that you want to priority sort, there are other ways to use it but the above is my go-to.In post 163, Titus wrote:@Copper - So you think we're in RVS is an excuse to keep a vote on a town read/lean?
I don't think setting myself up to be on both matters much when nobody's on Shotty. If I was setting myself up to vote Ircher/Copper, sure, but only one of the two is a viable wagon rn. Also, not sure how you see it as agreeing with both players when I call their entire discussion stupid.In post 160, projectmatt wrote:Primarily because in this post, he is setting himself up to vote for both Shotty/Ircher as opposed to taking one side. It looks like he's trying really hard to agree with both players at the same time.In post 102, TehBrawlGuy wrote:The whole statistics discussion is stupid and doesn't read natural. Feels like a poor attempt at distancing to me, as does Ircher's "go vote shotty". VOTE: Ircher
Copper case has no real merit imo. Copper had no reason to unvote/vote anyone else, but also no reason to actually believe Ircher was more likely to be scum than anyone else at the time.
Also, I want to see him under pressure.
Why the hell would any townie want to be bogged down with 6 cases to defend against, rather than scumhunting? The part about chit-chat and answering questions is also there to make cases on him weaker and easier to defeat. Chit-chat that seems forced or questions that have been answered poorly are fine signs of Scum. If you're actually Town, and thus can justify anything you've done with Town motivation, why does that need to be there?In post 116, Ircher wrote:Ok, all 6 of you who are voting me:
Make me a detailed case not only pointing out what is scummy but also explaining in detail why its scummy. What Egg has done is not by any means close to what I'm asking for.
Pedit: Except, general chit-chat and answering questions isnt scummy. Thats a fact.
My my, AtE for the rest of town to quick lynch me and possibly an attempt to tilt me in the same sentence? How evil.In post 170, SethYazura wrote:VOTE: Cooper
RVS is fair and just, because we will laugh hard if you flip scum.