In post 158, MariaR wrote:
This post is objectively false. It's not backwards reasoning because doing something and
saying
something are 2 dif things. Acting one way is something admitting to it is something else and I think that's the case and point here.
Point 2:
How is that scummy? It's just blunt and true. Sure it's not the most optimal town play but that doesn't mean it's scummy.
Like day 1 for me I fully expect to be suspected maybe even lynched so I might just "roll with the flow"
same type of reasoning.
The point is the progression is weird: he hard townreads him for aggressiveness but then dislikes him admitting he's aggressive as either alignment - I could understand if his reaction was
'Oh, in that case I'll rescind my hard townread on you'
, but to say he doesn't like it implies he sees it as possibly scum-motivated - which is weird as I would have expected his natural progression here to be
'why would scum admit they shouldn't be townread for something?'.
I addressed point 2 already.