Mafiascum.net

In post 145, Srceenplay wrote:Tiam you wanna be my friend this game?

I didn't know buddying people could be that easy.

In post 150, Garuga wrote:

In post 145, Srceenplay wrote:Tiam you wanna be my friend this game?

I didn't know buddying people could be that easy.

It’s all about personality.
I’m close to asking you as well.

In post 150, Garuga wrote:

In post 145, Srceenplay wrote:Tiam you wanna be my friend this game?

I didn't know buddying people could be that easy.

Sure it can, certain players are pretty easy to figure out later on. Srceen and I have a lot of experience together.

In post 149, TwoInAMillion wrote:We'll go with it for now. What's your record on your gut reads?

I don’t keep records but if I had to guess I would say around 70%

Garuga being nice and agreeing with people who suspect him is strange. It makes me think scum who wants to disarm or appeal to his accusers. However his posts about the other players show a townie pov. He's contributing to the discussion at least so for now I'll UNVOTE:

Byron's posts: That's a lot of no content that looks like content. But I'm townreading the tone of his posts. He really seems to want to generate content. Especially that it would be risky for scum to talk about so many people like that right from the start where you basically have nothing but gut to go on. He doesn't strike me as someone who's confident enough to put himself in a position where he would have to continue explaining his reads and read progression. Talking about the entire playerlist exposes several holes for people to attack you for weak reasoning. Especially when it is really pointless to talk about everyone. Why post a read on someone that hasn't posted anything yet?
Since he likes the word so much, this is what you would call anti-town. It's not helpful that you tells us x and y haven't posted yet when the game has just begun.
However your tone does seem towny and I can't really see the scum motivation to post like you.

Which brings us to shoshin who imo is suspecting byron based on a shallow look at his posts. It is an easy thing for scum to attack someone for; especially that people's definition of "fluff" may differ so it is really easy to defend yourself when calling something fluff. VOTE: shoshin

I also don't like hop's naked vote. I thought he wanted to RVS vote because he missed it but his follow up implies he means it. He needs to give reasons if he wants sheepers.
I do agree with Brawl that hop's 77 is good. And I am willing to give a slight townlean on brawl for 116. I think it shows him apprpaching things from an unbiased perspective.

I still like mumble for town but less sarcasm please. I don't want to have to guess why you're using the sarcasm later. It will cause unnecessary paranoia.

Let us focus people outside of Shoshin and Byron because they both might be town

People have been ignoring me this game I'm not sure I like it

P4. Posting as I read each page.
80 works fine from a Bayesian perspective.
Slight scumlean on Saudade following 83.
Slight townread on Byron. Sad I wasn’t on the list as obvtown like I should be though.
@Gustavo: Interested in the overeager read on Byron, and why it’s bad. He isn’t really forming many scumreads as far as I could tell. I don’t think scum massively benefit from forming light townreads and slightly shading less activies given they don’t know how the less active players are going to post/what they’re thinking. I liked it was wide for the same reason.

In post 100, Garuga wrote:

In post 81, Hopkirk wrote:

In post 79, BuJaber wrote:

In post 78, Hopkirk wrote:VOTE: TehBrawlGuy

Do we have to pay to access the full post?

I'm hoping we can find some town in the smart sheepers.

Are you implying that the "smart choice" is to sheep you?

Yes. I am 100% sure I caught scum in like 5 minutes because I am just that good at scumhunting.
On an unrelated note, UNVOTE: Una because I like him now.

In post 103, Mumble wrote:VOTE: Byron

The entirety of your reads are activity based. They aren't premature, they are baseless and basically amount to fluff. You need to tweak your definition of inactive as well...your homesite operate on a 48/24 cycle?

Like, this isn't AI and I can follow the thought process behind forming the reads? Why's it scummy?

In post 109, Garuga wrote:Fair enough. What about the part where he says I'm asking a lot of questions?

VOTE: Hopkirk
I think his post where he voted for TehBrawlGuy sounded manipulative.

That's because it was intended for manipulation.
I like/think it's funny how you think a naked vote can be manipulative.

Oh yeah, TBG I liked since I disliked Saudade’s lack of response to 77, and TBG wanted to go after Saudade in 116 (maybe partially influenced by 77 idk).
@Garuga 131: actually that’s almost literally the opposite on my intent. Seeing who sheeps a vote when I imply it’s townie and hasn’t played with me before (so isn’t going to go along with it to try and read me), but when there’s also no particularly good reason to vote there isn’t very townie.
It’s not the amount of words that matter, it’s how they’re chosen.

In post 153, Srceenplay wrote:

In post 149, TwoInAMillion wrote:We'll go with it for now. What's your record on your gut reads?

This is meant to be a joke right?

I don’t keep records but if I had to guess I would say around 70%

In post 156, Saudade wrote:People have been ignoring me this game I'm not sure I like it

Start interacting with people proactively then? If you aren't starting anything yourself then you're lurking.
Complaining about been ignored when you haven't actually responded to my last question is pretty eh.

The response to Screen's quote was inside the quote because typed it after where i saw /quote

Townpool right now: Bujaber, Byron, Garuga, TBG (who i refer to as una for some reason earlier).

VOTE: Saudade

So two posts by me have made you certain I am scum due to logic that you dare not reveal

VOTE: Hopkirk
Alright mate I'll dance with you humor me

"Why don't you want a fourth? It's 7 to lynch"



HAHAHAHAHA IS THIS WHAT MAKES YOU SCUMREAD ME BECAUSE I MISSED/OR DIDNT REPLY TO THAT HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

scenes when the guy I actually didnt want to put a 4th vote on is actually in your fucking townpool you absolute bellend get better reads mate

I like how Saudade became active when Hopkirk put him in the spotlight. It really shows how interested he is in contributing to the discussion. [/sarcasm]

Him trying to divert attention away from Byron and Shoshin might be a clue to his scumbuddies, but for now I'll just VOTE: Saudade

Getting really active when accused is a scumtell that actually works, right Screen?
The name escapes me for now.

Saudade's entire ISO is sketchy.. I can get behind this
Why vote sho then unvote? Why is it bad to have 4 votes on someone when it was pretty much all RVS votes?

Why the vote on Brawl?

Why are you townreading sho and byron? Highly unlikely it's TvT imo.

Why vote hop? OMGUS much?

And just the general disinterested/antagonistic tone.. you don't seem interested in helping town at all.

VOTE: Saudade

oh dear me you're all just terrible.
literally contradicting yourselves in your own posts lol

A'ight boys lets get a wagon on Saudade then

What could possibly go wrong

imagine talking about activity and inactivity in a 7 page game ooooooooooooooooooooooooooffffffffffffff

In post 156, Saudade wrote:People have been ignoring me this game I'm not sure I like it

What do you feel has been ignored?

Generally my name wasn't up in lights like it is now so it's all good