Mafiascum.net

Discuss

NEXT MEME

In post 147, BNL wrote:

In post 64, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 61, Almost50 wrote:OK, so here's a declaration: I won't claim which channel(s) I'm in and won't be posting in them either for the time being. You should all be concerned I could read what you say in your channel(s) without you realizing I'm in it.

Spoiler:

Damn, I couldn't have come up with a scummier declaration. Couple that with my RVS vote on myself, and I should be considered the antichrist of the game by all other players already.

I had the thought of doing this as well, but I decided to speak in one of them.

Also, I think this is a scummy entrance
UNVOTE: Dunnstral
VOTE: Morality (Flavor Leaf's new account)

Discuss.

If I was scum/SK, I’d have claimed it in my first post, instead I actually talked about some of my thoughts and insight on the play that Almost50.

VOTE: BNL

This seems like a forced push.

In addition, I was pretty talkative in a channel, and I made a comment questioning the channel’s thoughts if I told them I was unable to speak in the main thread.

Almost50 bringing up the subject of being in channels and not outing themselves stood out to me simply because I had also thought about doing that, so it was a mind melt of sorts. I’m about 85% sure that A50 is town because of it, as opposed to the 72% I feel about the majority of everyone else. BNL’s comment brings him down to about a 60%, which at the moment, is most likely from what I have perceived. Yes, I made all those percentages up, but consider me an artist who is painting a mental picture for you to see where I’m coming from.

In post 9, BNL wrote:

I am a miller

VOTE: Dunnstral

In post 14, Clemency wrote:never been a miller before or seen many so i'm not brushed up on the etiquette

I believe Clemency’s claim much more than I do BNL’s, and it’s simply for the fact that Clemency saw the Miller claim, and it seemed to ping him that proper etiquette as a miller would be to claim there, so I’m town reading Clemency.

BNL’s Miller claim is NAI to me. A couple years ago, I’d think it would be townie, but nowadays, Miller has been pretty common, and there was an influx of fake miller claims and millers in setups over the past year and a half.

I have been a part of fake claiming miller gambits, throwing Millers in setups for no apparent reason, and being in some miller revolving setups. I feel like BNL easily could be scum claiming miller, so I’m going to treat the claim as NAI.

Clemency is townie, however.

Chito:

I claim page 7 in the name of the town

scum is not allowed to post on page 7

if you are scum and you post on page 7 you are breaking the rules

yeet

Hello to ya folks again.



This picture is important.

In post 57, Torque wrote:Joan of Arc do you mind linking your main account

a member search of plumber gave me nothing

I do not wish to disclose this at this point of time. I am trying to improve my play, you see.

and I don't want to rely on people knowing me to read me correctly.

id tell you who she is but i dont dislike the wagon on her

~Near

In post 129, BNL wrote:

In post 23, Near x Mello wrote:dunn voting for us first thing is bold

ill townread him maybe

~Near

How does that make him town

dunno I think scum dunn doesn't want us as enemies

maybe im completely wrong

~Near

And I'd tell you guys who she is but I don't not have no idea whose alt that is, so it doesn't matter

you don't not have an idea or you do

~Near

In post 162, Near x Mello wrote:you don't not have an idea or you do

~Near

yeah

Real talk I don't know

Hello.

I'm a Priest, so if we get someone at L-1, I'll gladly confirm. Of course, I could be a scum Priest, but at least the mechanical inability to hammer will be confirmed.

In post 153, Morality wrote:

In post 9, BNL wrote:

I am a miller

VOTE: Dunnstral

In post 14, Clemency wrote:never been a miller before or seen many so i'm not brushed up on the etiquette

I believe Clemency’s claim much more than I do BNL’s, and it’s simply for the fact that Clemency saw the Miller claim, and it seemed to ping him that proper etiquette as a miller would be to claim there, so I’m town reading Clemency.

BNL’s Miller claim is NAI to me. A couple years ago, I’d think it would be townie, but nowadays, Miller has been pretty common, and there was an influx of fake miller claims and millers in setups over the past year and a half.

I have been a part of fake claiming miller gambits, throwing Millers in setups for no apparent reason, and being in some miller revolving setups. I feel like BNL easily could be scum claiming miller, so I’m going to treat the claim as NAI.

Clemency is townie, however.

Why did you suddenly bring my miller claim up when I pushed you?

In post 141, BNL wrote:

In post 47, Reasonably Psychotic wrote:

In post 44, mastina wrote:

In post 42, Clemency wrote:no you're not but nice try

True enough, but realclaim talk, I actually am one with the other miller claim.

Explicit mason claim with BulletNLynchproof? Literal mod confirmation of your alignments to one another, and not the SU1 BS you pulled with Drixx and I?

@miller claims: Elaborate on the details of how your miller modifier functions.

Again choosing not to sign deliberately.

What details exactly do you want?

There are a lot of hypothetical ways that a miller can function. It could only show up as guilty to gunsmiths or cops. It could be a universal miller who always investigates as guilty, so trackers show you going to the kill. It could even be some weird miller thing where you count as scum for conditional effects like a desperado shot.

It's important, especially with multiple miller claims, to know exactly how each one interacts with all common investigatives/alignment based roles.

You should ask about this. So should Clemency.

-Yukiteru

In post 14, Clemency wrote:never been a miller before or seen many so i'm not brushed up on the etiquette

Alright.

In post 137, BNL wrote:

In post 39, Reasonably Psychotic wrote:

In post 9, BNL wrote:

I am a miller

VOTE: Dunnstral

In post 10, Clemency wrote:oh yeah same btw

In post 11, Clemency wrote:this is what happens when you pick antagonists

I dislike the interaction above, and think it reflects poorly on Clemency.

Hard disagree. I think the way Clemency claimed is very town indicative.

So first Clemency goes on an epic shitposting spree, ignoring declared serious vote ... until magically someone else comes in to respond to me ... and only this post quoted does Clemency resume actually playing.

That's not suspicious ... at all. /s (because it's actually necessary sadly)

In post 145, BNL wrote:By the way based on how hoods are generated this game I don't think any hood is more likely than another to contain scum. In fact, even an all scum hood isn't implausible.

This REEKS of too much information. How could you possibly know the specifics of how the hoods were generated with enough certainty to declare that? You can't.


Winrar, Winrar, Chicken Dinrar?

Yuki are you gonna follow up on Ali and I's answers

In post 39, Reasonably Psychotic wrote:

In post 30, Robert2424 wrote:

Vote Near x Mello

Still Policy voting here, new game same crap.

Please don't. Not D1. Leave your bullshit behind, deal with it on D2 maybe. Let D1 be the fruitful scumhunting day it can be, without burying it beneath past grudges.

Wouldn't D1 be the best time to air grievances? We don't have to lynch off them or make them the core of the day, but it's best to take care of that early imo.

In post 34, Asking for a friend wrote:I think hoods should be claimed early.
BnL should pick up a new role pm tonight.
Aside from that I am probably going to let the duck post on my behalf, atleast for D1. This is bound to be a clusterfuck and I want to just post funny memes until we get some flips going.

Agreed on millers picking up new role PM's as soon as possible, and believe they should making full claims immediately prior to changing their role; public claim preferred, hood claim MIGHT be okay IF hood contents are known.

However.

I'd like an elaboration upon the benefits you see coming from sharing hood membership early. Yes, this is a test.

I guess I agree here...? We'll see.

In post 42, Clemency wrote:no you're not but nice try

I also find this worth filing away for later.

In post 48, Almost50 wrote:

In post 41, mastina wrote:Hi I'm a mason with Clemency.
VOTE: Joan of Arc.
Scum!

For a second I was like "What is the

MOD

doing?"

VOTE: Almost50

You know why, monkey. No one's gonna leave you alone, so you had better start playing already.

wdym "what was the mod doing"?

In post 55, Joan of Arc wrote:

In post 54, mastina wrote:

In post 46, Joan of Arc wrote:

In post 43, Joan of Arc wrote:

In post 41, mastina wrote:Hi I'm a mason with Clemency.
VOTE: Joan of Arc.
Scum!

Any particular reasons why?

Because you scumslipped, duh.

Where?

In post 56, Joan of Arc wrote:Considering I am town, there isn't any and there can't be any, so you are bluffing.

Yeah this person is scrambling it seems.
VOTE: Jaune Arc