Mafiascum.net

But, only maybe

OK, I'll vote here.

VOTE: insomnia

In post 71, GrandWazoo wrote:

In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 55, PenguinPower wrote:I'm less happy about three votes on Locke and lots of one-vote vanity wagons.

I also get bad gut feels from the above.

Should I jump on locke with you?

My gut and experience tells me urap isn't this sheep-y as town.

VOTE: urap

I think, scum maybe makes fake meta townreads more than fake meta scumreads. But, I'm not sure.

I guess I'll see if I'm right.

In post 147, Lovebird wrote:Chicken is town

There was a time when I rejected this. That time has passed.

In post 147, Lovebird wrote:Person2 town. Penguin town. Chicken is town.

Easy game

In post 148, Lovebird wrote:Who should I vote?

These two posts feel HORRIBLE back to back.

Totally forgot about this game lmao, guess that's what I get for playing in like 4 games+

I'll catch up in a bit

Ok, so nomnomnom looks like newbscum to me at the moment, yet I think if we keep her alive for a bit maybe her game progresses and she will change my read or she's going to give us her scum buds through her actions. I do believe newbies are good to keep around since they usually improve their game later on and you can figure them out more easily.

I like roster, giving him my almighty town read. I don't like PP defending nom and pushing lurkers when nom is a scum-lean for most of the people on this thread.

I do feel like my wagon is a counter-wagon to locke. His interaction with urap was weird, he didn't push the "should I vote locke with you, PP" bit too hard. I didn't like urap's reaction to it either. He said this:

In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 55, PenguinPower wrote:I'm less happy about three votes on Locke and lots of one-vote vanity wagons.

I also get bad gut feels from the above.

Should I jump on locke with you?

And gut feels on me or on NomNomNom?

This is a question that demands a yes or no answer. It's as simple as that and it's common sense. "? Yes or no?"

In post 76, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 74, Locke113 wrote:Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?

It is possible that I have asked a similar question before, but I can't think of one, so let's go with No.

Permission is not the word I would use though.

I asked PP for his opinion on where my vote should be

.

First of all:

No, you asked him if you should vote Locke with him. Not where he believes you should place the vote.

Second of all:

I don't like how Locke didn't push this at all. It looked like a scum vs scum interaction if you ask me, they both went too easy on each other and then abandoned the discussion.

Given all this plus my gut feels, I'm the counterwagon to locke. Needless to say, this is where my vote will stay for the rest of the day.

VOTE: Locke

I'll be going with this.
VOTE: urap

In post 158, nomnomnom wrote:I'll be going with this.
VOTE: urap

I'd like an explanation coming with this vote as well. Not just a naked vote.

Wanted to make this vote yesterday already. Mostly explained in this post.

In post 117, nomnomnom wrote:Okay I wanna lay down my thoughts rn because a lot is going through my head after a quick rereading.

- urap has felt a lot less like town these last messages. Not sure what that would say about roster though.
[...]
I'm hesitating between an urap and insomnia vote, right now.

Wanted to make that choice yesterday but Alac and PP started arguing for quite some time, so yeah.
I have more faith in an urap vote than a vote in you.

In post 106, nomnomnom wrote:It's not really about pushing reads, BWs, lynches and whatnot, it's the way they talk specifically rather than what's being said that struck me as ultra weird.

Awww.

In post 122, nomnomnom wrote:Alac, do you appear every time someone mentions your name or how does it work? Weird timing

Alakazam!

Mmmk. URAP is town. PP is town. Altricity is town.

Insomnia is trying to pocket me, and is buddies with nom^3.

I do believe newbies are good to keep around since they usually improve their game later on and you can figure them out more easily.

Is a scumclaim.

VOTE: Insomnia

Nope, I just sincerely believe newbies have weird entrances on this website that ping as scum most of the time, regardless of alignment. If you look into my meta, you'll see I don't often vote newbies based on their first few posts, I like to vote based on actions. Like a counterwagon on a lurker. But, that might just be me *sips tea*

Yeah but you think she's scum. You have not displayed such conviction on your Locke read. And nom was a perfectly legit counterwagon to push.

I said she looks like newbscum at the moment. Big difference. That's why I'd like to keep her around so I can figure her out based on her actions and not her first posts on this website.

It is just against my nature to vote newbies based on their entrances. I honestly believe that's a bad play.

You can meta-check on that one.

I agree with insomnia right now. I think nom is the easy mislynch today. They're a d1 lynch more than d1 imo

That should have said d2 more than d1

Besides, there are people who stopped posting after my counterwagon, like N_M or wazoo. I'd like to hear everyone before we lynch someone. Be it me or someone else.

I'd like to note how frustrating it is to play with someone like n_m, that doesn't show up for most of the early discussions and the one time he does it's for a bad joke on something random.

In post 157, insomnia wrote:I don't like PP defending nom and pushing lurkers when nom is a scum-lean for most of the people on this thread.

Where am I doing this?

I think you meant "I don't like PP starting my wagon."

In post 170, nomnomnom wrote:I'd like to note how frustrating it is to play with someone like n_m, that doesn't show up for most of the early discussions and the one time he does it's for a bad joke on something random.

He's not going to show up for most of the game except to quickhammer.

L-2 is the new L-1 in N_M games.

That's honestly stupid.

In post 80, PenguinPower wrote:Why nom^3?

In post 84, PenguinPower wrote:I feel all of those are valid responses.

Sorry - not seeing scum intent there.