In post 113, Skygazer wrote:in the last coalition game no lunch suggested a coalition of ppl of ppl who are town and easy to read lategame moreso than just town
i agree w that take
you townreading me yet?
ehhh not sure how my posting got any better and i thought u were pushing for me to react to the hurt rather than actually scumreading my shitpost
i do not understand this post
i asked if you're townreading me and you responded by talking about how *i* should be reading *you*?
the implication is i dont see ur read on me as natural
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:31 am
by implosion
my read on you is pretty ambiguated at this point
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:32 am
by Blake Belladonna
In post 142, Quest wrote:and if it fails, then it's whatever, this player list is more than capable of winning during mountainous.
This is a high enough caliber playerlist that I think my approach wouldn't really affect the odds of the coalition succeeding in the first place, but it would have an effect on town's win chances if the coalition does fail.
I'm well aware of what I'm doing and how other people see this type of approach. Have at least a little faith, please.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:32 am
by Tim Goodman
Quest / Blake interactions feel town-town to me. I'm considering healing Quest as well but I feel like I have less to go on there.
I'd prefer if she played less minimalist-y and elaborated more on her thoughts.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:33 am
by Blake Belladonna
Nvm, I think I'm having a communication issue.
I'll let the thread breathe for a bit since this is kind of derailing the game.
I'll let the thread breathe for a bit since this is kind of derailing the game.
I'll be around later if you want to talk some more. I'm not trying to get on your nerves, and it's not that I've got no faith in you; I just think you're using the wrong approach.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:35 am
by implosion
all the highposters being town is way too simple, though it wouldn't surprise me a ton atm. I'm really not convinced that skygazer has done scummy things thus far.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:35 am
by implosion
i don't think we need continue the discussion about approaches at all yet. It's not important atm.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:35 am
by Quest
In post 153, Tim Goodman wrote:I'd prefer if she played less minimalist-y and elaborated more on her thoughts.
That's not happening on this account, that's the whole reason I'm on an alt this game.
That said, if there's anything you want me to go more in-depth on, let me know.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:36 am
by Skygazer
i dont think i can confidently read anyone in this playerlist tbh im gonna go nap and reset myself
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 11:04 am
by the worst
deadline:
(expired on 2019-06-02 23:00:00)
mod notes:
- weiss schnee is v/la until marathon weekend is over
- please let me know if i made any mistakes... i can't fix them...
- click here for joined mod iso
I'd actually go as far as to say I'm leaning slightly scum on her, there's actually very little I'd say is outright town from her and a couple things I saw that would suggest otherwise.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 11:28 am
by Quest
Yikes.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 11:31 am
by implosion
i kiiiiiinda agree that the whole blake having a weird approach to the game could be townish.
i also kinda feel like the "maximum of one scum has posted so far" line was objectively super scummy and she's just been trying to backpedal since then. Calling it bait just feels unnecessary. Phrasing feels kind of scummy at a couple points, like 85 and 58. Even 90 itself kinda feels like scum saying "okay i'm under some pressure, let me say this thing that is an actual opinion that I have as a distraction". The opinion itself is absolutely not townish, it's probably an opinion that she has regardless of alignment, and if it's a genuine opinion there isn't much real reason for scum to not say it.
so i guess i don't actually really agree w/ that thing i said i agreed with at the top of this post