Mafiascum.net

In post 149, january wrote:asking other people for reads is how you get game content, so how exactly is the question bizarre?

is there something that I've done that you like or dislike?

Right. And I agree, asking people for their reads provides info. 100% agree.

There’s a difference between asking a question and taking the answer vs. asking a question and not liking the answer given and refuting it

fair enough, just seemed to me like you avoided answering at all. not gonna keep pushing u on that, just felt a bit noncommital with the answer

thoughts on anyone else? who's your scumread right now?

/in

is it normally this dead

anyways... haven't voted yet but right now i'd be comfortable voting either Vorkuta or Suspicious and pray that i'm at least half right

still waiting on:
-Vorkuta's answer to #116
-GeorgeBailey's answer to #142
-general reads from Jamelia

(also just figured out how to link posts so yay : )

In post 140, Zenith wrote:According to Plotinus on page 1: "Mafia are able to communicate in their Private Topic at all times"

Uh what was this for?

I hate the way Zenith is misreading suspicious' posts t(9

though*

I have fancypants as town for the way they are playing earlier, maybe January too.

VOTE: Zenith

Staying here for now.

In post 154, january wrote:anyways... haven't voted yet but right now i'd be comfortable voting either Vorkuta or Suspicious and pray that i'm at least half right

still waiting on:
-Vorkuta's answer to #116
-GeorgeBailey's answer to #142
-general reads from Jamelia

(also just figured out how to link posts so yay : )

Can you elaborate on the Vorkuta angle? There are some hints to this in prior posting but no full commitment; #143 takes a step here but doesn't go further.

In post 155, ceejayvinoya wrote:

In post 140, Zenith wrote:According to Plotinus on page 1: "Mafia are able to communicate in their Private Topic at all times"

Uh what was this for?

In post 135, tictac wrote: Nothing in Zeniths posts even hinted at L-1 possibly being a mistake.
You jumping to that conclusion looks like ya assumed benign intent because of informed POW or unreasoned defence because he is your buddy.

However

in his next post zen changes his stance and didn't intend to put sus at L-1 but at L-2 (which ya said would be reasonable),like ya gave him an out he didn't think of himself. I think this is a mild point against you guys having

daytalk

.

I didn't change my stance btw. I meant to put him at L-2. If he had already been at L-2 before I had started writing my post then I would have meant to put him at L-1, though I would have clearly marked him as L-1 with the warning to declare intent and give a chance for dialog before actually hammering. Unlike some people, I'm not afraid to put an RVS at L-1 if done properly. (With the disclaimer.) I actually think L-1 is mostly better than L-2.

Do you plan on ignoring my questions ad nauseam?

VOTE: Zenith

Tinfoil hat is Bailey/Zen.

OMGUS

Lol

How dense are you trying to be

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Zenith

(4): Jamelia, tictac, ceejayvinoya, Suspicious

Suspicious

(1): Zenith

january

(1): Vorkuta

Jamelia

(1): FancyPants

Not Voting

(2): january, GeorgeBailey

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-10-26 08:30:00).

comatlas wrote:/in

If you want to play a game, post your /in in this thread. This game has enough players already.[/area]

I dont think Zenith is scum, it doesn't feel right, stuff like putting people at L-1 happens in Newbies at the time. I'd say his odds of being scum are about the same as what they were at the beginning of the game, I.e 2/9.

I do kind of what do lynch him now though for the wagon information but that's not good enough a couple days in.

@Georgebailey if you absolutely had to lynch someone now, who would it be and why?

@vort, what are your feelings on Zenith? In fact can everyone who Hasn't given feelings on the Zenith wagon, please do so.

@CeeJay, can you elaborate on your reasons for your Zenith vote for posterity?

As I've said before, should make it clear when you are voting someone to L-1. Strong scrum lean on suspicious at this point.

@Suspicious I'd like to hear your case against me. Do you actually think I'm scum? Or is it mere OMGUS reaction?

And if OMGUS, are you a perhaps a frustrated townie or an upset caughtscum?

In post 169, Zenith wrote:As I've said before, should make it clear when you are voting someone to L-1. Strong scrum lean on suspicious at this point.

Well, that would be a courtesy that I seemingly didn't deserve early game. #44 you state that an L-1 is never a bad idea here, and then you backtrack upon questioning in #126 that L-1 wasn't intentional, and it was supposed to be L-2 instead. Because other unvotes occurred, you believed that clarification was unnecessary; this is despite being put under suspicion and getting questioned for this action. If the L-1 was a mistake, why didn't you say so immediately to clear yourself?

You double down in #161 that the L-2 was what you were aiming for, but an L-1 is fine and you have no problem with it; you admit that, however, it should have been given a warning. Which once again begs the question, why did you not offer a warning in the first place? What was left was a naked vote that, if you're town here, caused unneeded confusion.

In post 170, Zenith wrote:@Suspicious I'd like to hear your case against me. Do you actually think I'm scum? Or is it mere OMGUS reaction?

If you would like to know my case, you'll have to do what you have demonstrated you haven't done and read my ISO. It shouldn't be my job to reiterate my posts/questions for you, especially if you continue to dodge them as you have been doing up to this point. If you are town here, the ball's in your court.

Are you high?

Are you generally incapable of reading?