Mafiascum.net

Datisi, I am deeply sorry if it seemed like I was calling you a cheater, that was not my intention. I don't even consider somebody who breaks a rule is a cheater, people break rules all the time. cheating is something next level.

my interpretation of the rules are obviously different. To me using information from other games is like "As town Mike Hunt always argues" or "as scum, joe mamma usually lurks"

coming in voting somebody because they were scum in another game, is interpreted as a grudge, especially if that person beat you.

So my sincere apologies for implying you cheated or broke any sort of rule.

that said, I still find it incredibly scummy even if to others it is an illogical reason to do so.

In post 147, Wimpy wrote:

In post 143, Menalque wrote:

In post 27, Wimpy wrote:

In post 23, Datisi wrote:Maybe y'all should stick to salads

VOTE: Datisi

In post 47, Wimpy wrote:It was a serious vote

“Guys. It was a page 2 vote. There’s not enough evidence to suggest anyone was actually scum.”

So which time were you telling the truth?

Both.

Have you played mafia before?

Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy

doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum. I never declared I thought he is definitely scum.

Based on what has transpired though, you look more like scum than he does. I still find him scummy also. Imagine that. I can find people scummy and still don’t know if they are scum.

Clearly I must be scum. How can town think somebody is scummy but not think they are actually scum...

And cause with you I actually think it needs to be said. that last line was sarcasm.

Basically, “I didn’t think

In post 149, Datisi wrote:

In post 53, Wimpy wrote:Cause I dislike when people come in and reference past games and vote them for it. It violates site rules and

is scummy.

I mean you said I was scummy here

and I'm getting bent because I had a feeling that your reasoning for a "serious vote" was very flimsy and possibly scum indicative

Mena voted me as well and I didn't attack him

however i am willing to drop this pissing match because i don't think it's too helpful for Town

yes I called you scummy. Being called scummy doesn't mean you are scum.

my reason for my serious vote WAS flimsy. I would never expect you to get lynched because of that reason. I would never be able to convince others to lynch you for that reason but for page 2, it is a perfectly good reason. I am not really concerned how people interpret my actions. I don't possibly understand how you could think that is scum indicative, just like you don't understand how I thought your opening posts were.

I'd also say despite it being flimsy, it's still better than anything menal has provided why I am scum, and he expects people to put me at L-1.


I think you were scum cause you did something I have seen scum do

he thinks I am scum cause I was faking being non-chalant.

remember menal did say this

In post 130, Menalque wrote:Your reasons are illogical because they don’t correspond to an actual metric of whether someone is scum or not

Can anyone seriously tell me menal's reasons correspond to any metric on somebody being scum or not?

so "I have seen scum do this before so i think you could be scum" is illogical and doesn't fit the metric but

you are faking being nonchalant does?

In post 151, Menalque wrote:My question: why do you think she’s scum? His answer: I’ve explained why [i think she’s scum].

If he wasn’t saying she was scum, why not correct me here. The implied in his answer is that he does think Datisi is scum.

you are really going to play the semantics card?

Notice how hard wimpy is trying to change the narrative around his datisi vote

In post 153, Wimpy wrote:

In post 151, Menalque wrote:My question: why do you think she’s scum? His answer: I’ve explained why [i think she’s scum].

If he wasn’t saying she was scum, why not correct me here. The implied in his answer is that he does think Datisi is scum.

you are really going to play the semantics card?

Then in [post]153[/vote] he’s trying to avoid engaging with the substance of my argument

I specifically bolded the "scummy" part there, but I honestly appreciate and accept the apology. While you didn't call me a cheater, saying I broke site rules when I clearly didn't did anger me.

And rest assured, there is ABSOLUTELY NO grudge between me and Menalque - regarding the game in question (Micro 892), we were scum together, and it's one of my most favorite games I've played on this site.

And I still find your reasoning very illogical.

pedit: holy shit here you two go again
okay back into the pissing match we go i guess *unzips pants*

ppedit: uhhh

pppedit: LET ME POST

In post 151, Menalque wrote:So you’re p clearly lying

I p.clearly am not lying and nothing you posted proved that. Go ahead and hide behind semantics.

I don't have time to sit and clearly think out every single post I make to make sure I correct people when they ask me why i think somebody is scum when I don't actually think they are 100% scum, but i do think they are scummy and have the potential to be scum.

if you have that kind of time, good for you mate.

Like that’s not a town response, I’m sorry

Town doesn’t go “oh you’re gonna play the semantics card huh” when there’s an argument there that they think is being pushed by scum

In post 155, Menalque wrote:Then in [post]153[/vote] he’s trying to avoid engaging with the substance of my argument

there was no substance in your argument

In post 156, Datisi wrote:I specifically bolded the "scummy" part there, but I honestly appreciate and accept the apology. While you didn't call me a cheater, saying I broke site rules when I clearly didn't did anger me.

And rest assured, there is ABSOLUTELY NO grudge between me and Menalque - regarding the game in question (Micro 892), we were scum together, and it's

one of

my most favorite games I've played on this site.

And I still find your reasoning very illogical.

pedit: holy shit here you two go again
okay back into the pissing match we go i guess *unzips pants*

ppedit: uhhh

pppedit: LET ME POST

AHEM

In post 156, Datisi wrote:And I still find your reasoning very illogical.

you are entitled to think that

In post 159, Wimpy wrote:

In post 155, Menalque wrote:Then in [post]153[/vote] he’s trying to avoid engaging with the substance of my argument

there was no substance in your argument

I mean yes there obviously was

You claimed that you never actually thought datisi was scum just that she had been scummy

I pointed out how you quite clearly were claiming you thought datisi was scum in your earlier posts

In post 160, Menalque wrote:AHEM

FINE IT'S MY FAVORITE GAME I'VE PLAYED CAN WE GO BACK TO SUBJECT AT HAND?

In post 163, Datisi wrote:

In post 160, Menalque wrote:AHEM

FINE IT'S MY FAVORITE GAME I'VE PLAYED CAN WE GO BACK TO SUBJECT AT HAND?

Yis

In post 156, Datisi wrote:okay back into the pissing match we go i guess *unzips pants*

I am done responding to menalque, and probably you for a while. You both want to nitpick every little thing and while i can't talk about it, I am definitely annoyed at this site right now cause people want to nitpick instead of actually letting the game play out.

so you guys keep doing you. I have nothing more to say to either you about the first 6 pages. If I get lynched, I guess i will learn to somehow use logic that applies to everyone (despite actually knowing what other people consider logical and illogical) and ignore what I personally think is logical.


Good day chaps. Off to enjoy a tasty breakfast burger

In post 162, Menalque wrote:I mean yes there obviously was

You claimed that you never actually thought datisi was scum just that she had been scummy

I pointed out how you quite clearly were claiming you thought datisi was scum in your earlier posts

In post 147, Wimpy wrote:Have you played mafia before?

Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum. I never declared I thought he is definitely scum.

Like honestly I’m sorry you rolled scum and outed yourself within like 5 pages to everyone but we still have to lynch you

I’ll give you feedback after the game if you like on how you can avoid it happening again

In post 71, Wimpy wrote:

In post 66, Datisi wrote:

In post 62, Wimpy wrote:I did call you scummy for it.

Ok then please give results of your sorting

And explain why referencing past games w/ a friend makes me scummy

I think you are probably scum.

I know I’m town
Menal is null

I fee when scum try to rvs it comes off awkward and yours came off awkward. I’m also not a fan of using people’s alignment in another game, in future games because I consider that outside influences. Even if it’s a joke

note the bolded.

also

In post 162, Menalque wrote:You claimed that you never actually thought datisi was scum just that she had been scummy

This is a lie.

In post 165, Wimpy wrote:

In post 156, Datisi wrote:okay back into the pissing match we go i guess *unzips pants*

I am done responding to menalque, and probably you for a while. You both want to nitpick every little thing and while i can't talk about it, I am definitely annoyed at this site right now cause people want to nitpick instead of actually letting the game play out.

so you guys keep doing you. I have nothing more to say to either you about the first 6 pages. If I get lynched, I guess i will learn to somehow use logic that applies to everyone (despite actually knowing what other people consider logical and illogical) and ignore what I personally think is logical.


Good day chaps. Off to enjoy a tasty breakfast burger

This is a lot of words to say “I realise I fucked up and outed myself so now I’m gonna ignore it and hope it goes away”

In post 168, Wimpy wrote:

In post 71, Wimpy wrote:

In post 66, Datisi wrote:

In post 62, Wimpy wrote:I did call you scummy for it.

Ok then please give results of your sorting

And explain why referencing past games w/ a friend makes me scummy

I think you are probably scum.

I know I’m town
Menal is null

I fee when scum try to rvs it comes off awkward and yours came off awkward. I’m also not a fan of using people’s alignment in another game, in future games because I consider that outside influences. Even if it’s a joke

note the bolded.

also

In post 162, Menalque wrote:You claimed that you never actually thought datisi was scum just that she had been scummy

This is a lie.

You claimed that in 147: “ Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum”

In post 151, Menalque wrote:Basically, “I didn’t think

he was scum”. “I never declared I thought

he is definitely scum is just pedantry.

this isn't pedantry btw. nobody has 100% certainty on page 2, or even 3, 4, and sometimes page 20.

In post 170, Menalque wrote:You claimed that in 147: “ Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum”

yes I said that. It is a factual statement that has been proven in every game of mafia ever played.

What is your point?

You clearly implied that you thought she was scum

Saying you never said she was definitely scum is pedantic ass covering so you can say “oh but I never said she was DEFINITELY scum”

In post 172, Wimpy wrote:

In post 170, Menalque wrote:You claimed that in 147: “ Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum”

yes I said that. It is a factual statement that has been proven in every game of mafia ever played.

What is your point?

You can’t keep your story straight and it’s because you’re scum

You claimed you voted datisi because you thought she was scum

Now you’re claiming that you just voted her because she was scummy but that you never really believed she was scum