Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 6:49 pm
I'd vote you if I weren't already voting you.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Why’s that?In post 150, Alduskkel wrote:I'd vote you if I weren't already voting you.
Hello! As I asked several times earlier, could you explain why you think this?In post 117, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:It’s weak but I’m considering his reaction Town for now.In post 107, Alduskkel wrote:VOTE: TSE
I’m not buying your Auro town read. Anyone could have easily said what Auro said regardless of alignment.
Auro, in post 85 you defended TSE by saying you thought TSE was just memeing, but post 90 makes it clear that’s not the case. Does this change your read at all?
That’s what I’m saying.
I'm assuming this is to me? I think I've already answered thisIn post 113, CheekyTeeky wrote:What's the purpose of this question? You're veering dangerously close to an RQS scumtell which seems to be becoming a thing in recent meta.In post 18, Chemist1422 wrote:with this one?In post 13, Klick wrote:Chemist what's your setup familiarity?
I read the wiki page
Fwiw this was 100% a troll response, I don't have a read on Chem yetIn post 138, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:@Auro
Something that bothers me is Klick said the following:
In post 51, Klick wrote:TownIn post 39, Chemist1422 wrote:one post reads are generally not a good idea in my experience
And didn’t give my read on you a pass.
Makes me think they are probably scum.
Because there is no Mason PT according to the rules we just know alignments.In post 153, Klick wrote:Hello! As I asked several times earlier, could you explain why you think this?In post 117, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:It’s weak but I’m considering his reaction Town for now.In post 107, Alduskkel wrote:VOTE: TSE
I’m not buying your Auro town read. Anyone could have easily said what Auro said regardless of alignment.
Auro, in post 85 you defended TSE by saying you thought TSE was just memeing, but post 90 makes it clear that’s not the case. Does this change your read at all?
That’s what I’m saying.
Which of these attacks do you believe is unfounded?In post 155, Auro wrote:Just noting that townreads should hold lesser weight as basis of attacks this game, generally speaking.
Why did you rule out Auro WIFOMing?In post 158, TrueSoulEnergy wrote: Because there is no Mason PT according to the rules we just know alignments.
The fact he said PT makes me believe he is VT.
I like how Cheeky comes on and starts a. random voting & b. saying many things in short-ish messages when he sees there's a wagon on him.In post 124, CheekyTeeky wrote:Hmm. To omgus or not to omgus?
VOTE: Woodchuck
Ok I want to lynch in {Wood, Aldus, Klick} at this point.
That's all you have a problem with? The length of my posts?In post 169, woodchuck321 wrote:I like how Cheeky comes on and starts a. random voting & b. saying many things in short-ish messages when he sees there's a wagon on him.In post 124, CheekyTeeky wrote:Hmm. To omgus or not to omgus?
VOTE: Woodchuck
Ok I want to lynch in {Wood, Aldus, Klick} at this point.
In post 140, Alduskkel wrote:Empty how?
How does this question serve any purpose? As I mentioned earlier scum tend to pose useless questions in RVS ime.In post 13, Klick wrote:Chemist what's your setup familiarity?
It's good that he follows up withIn post 33, Klick wrote:PEdit: why do you post so much?
But then no read is given until here: which is wtf. It could be a joke or reaction test, but then again that reinforces the idea that his RVS question had no purpose. I don't see follow up if it was intended as reaction bait.In post 42, Klick wrote:His first post seemed like he was in tune with the setup yet I've never seen a game of this setup with him in it. Wasn't sure if it ran in some marathon weekends that I missed. I'm also more familiar with Chemist than the rest of this list.In post 34, Alduskkel wrote:Klick why did you specifically ask Chemist (and not any other player) about his familiarity with the setup?
After mentioning that Chemist is the only player he is familiar with he assumes he knows how town!TSE would behave.In post 51, Klick wrote:TownIn post 39, Chemist1422 wrote:one post reads are generally not a good idea in my experience
Like tl;dr I don't actually see klick sorting. I just see content for the sake of content. I've seen one town read on yshtola, one scumread on TSE who I'm pretty sure is town. Each of those reads is the only real content in his ISO.In post 87, Klick wrote:I can see your logic but I'm not convinced it's where town!TSE would go in their logic.
In post 93, Chemist1422 wrote:Yeah I think there’s actually more value for VTs to inflate their townreads as a sort of mason cover
If you can justify a strong townread on someone and get the scum to believe you’re masons and shoot you, that outs a scum and clears a town
Explain the progression here? I don't track this vote.