In post 152, Ame wrote:Tweet and Cat are always so townie. I'm paragon btw.
okay, only because u asked nicelyIn post 151, Ame wrote:Tweet, can I ask what your occupation is? Also do you happen to know your mbti personality type?
This doesn't really take into account that schadd probably didn't open the thread at the exact moment scum came to a consensus. i'd actually be pretty surprised if he didIn post 153, clidd wrote:Good afternoon,
I've been thinking on how to approach this game, especially due to the peculiarities of the setup. My conclusion was that I would need some time to work better on my impressions and shape my conjecture on the possible combinations in the distribution of groups before actively engaging with the playerlist. Something that caught my attention, however, was the time when the topic was released, because according to post 2, there were two conditions for the game to be released:
*Starting with 11/13 confirms.
*Mafia have a consensus about the d1 partition.
Therefore, by the time the topic was released, there was obviously already a confirmation of at least 11 players, as well as a collective consensus on partitions by the mafia. Considering that the confirmations had a period of 48 hours between the 10th and the 12th of May to be made, it is more plausible, in my opinion, that the margin of 11 players had been reached before the mafia consensus, which indicates that the release of the topic probably occurred as a result of the mafia decision, which implies that possibly the three members should be online during this period and, consequently, commented at some point in the first two pages. Evidently, this is a premature speculation, but I would like to share this observation because I did not see any comments addressing this. I intend to give a more formed opinion about the groups as soon as I finish my analysis.
Hum, I agree that they could have chosen not to post in the initial phase, but I still believe that the delay in releasing the topic is suggestive.In post 158, Morning Tweet wrote:This doesn't really take into account that schadd probably didn't open the thread at the exact moment scum came to a consensus. i'd actually be pretty surprised if he didIn post 153, clidd wrote:Good afternoon,
I've been thinking on how to approach this game, especially due to the peculiarities of the setup. My conclusion was that I would need some time to work better on my impressions and shape my conjecture on the possible combinations in the distribution of groups before actively engaging with the playerlist. Something that caught my attention, however, was the time when the topic was released, because according to post 2, there were two conditions for the game to be released:
*Starting with 11/13 confirms.
*Mafia have a consensus about the d1 partition.
Therefore, by the time the topic was released, there was obviously already a confirmation of at least 11 players, as well as a collective consensus on partitions by the mafia. Considering that the confirmations had a period of 48 hours between the 10th and the 12th of May to be made, it is more plausible, in my opinion, that the margin of 11 players had been reached before the mafia consensus, which indicates that the release of the topic probably occurred as a result of the mafia decision, which implies that possibly the three members should be online during this period and, consequently, commented at some point in the first two pages. Evidently, this is a premature speculation, but I would like to share this observation because I did not see any comments addressing this. I intend to give a more formed opinion about the groups as soon as I finish my analysis.
that and scum could choose not to post immediately after the thread opened
In post 155, Ame wrote:Clidd and Albert for scum
I'd like to see you try.In post 156, Ame wrote:We lynch there today
In post 155, Ame wrote:Clidd and Albert for scum
I don't think you're evaluating the groups properly. Let me finish my analysis first and then we talk.In post 156, Ame wrote:We lynch there today
Elaborate?In post 120, Ame wrote:I think it's fairly likely that there are 2 scum in group 1, but not 3. I don't buy this reasoning from Albert.
or Kanna
Hmm, not so sure about that comparison.In post 165, Kanna wrote:Albert already reminds me of a certain fizzy drink orz
In post 170, Hoctac wrote:Something about scum!Albert's plan being "enter hard pushing group 1 in hopes of lynching it" doesn't sit right about me. It feels full of agenda and scummy, so I'm leaning town on him.
1/1/1 is a long hard road to victory for the scum, they automatically lose 1 player no matter what the town does.In post 173, Morning Tweet wrote:So conversely, if you're scum, you'd pick the 1/1/1 since that also lets you be lazy and win