Posted: Wed May 27, 2020 6:56 pm
Show me.In post 142, unwnd wrote:I'm really surprised TrueSoulEnergy hasn't been buried in votes yet every post he makes is not thrilling
Show me.In post 142, unwnd wrote:I'm really surprised TrueSoulEnergy hasn't been buried in votes yet every post he makes is not thrilling
OMGUSIn post 151, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Instead of throwing Shade how about you actually provide something to go along with it.
I don’t like you thus far.
How is it OMGUS to legit defend yourself when someone shades you?In post 152, unwnd wrote:OMGUSIn post 151, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Instead of throwing Shade how about you actually provide something to go along with it.
I don’t like you thus far.
This is an odd commentIn post 147, Pink Ball wrote:beeboy is such an obvious townread that I want them to be scum so they would be an interesting slot. If they're town they're not interesting 'cause it's really obvious
Why do you think a town read on TSE is a security position?In post 145, unwnd wrote:I think what I don't like about that post couples into how I'm reading the thread right now, which is essentially I think ND's proposed townreads are all security positions. The people who are commonly townread are town. Job well done hats off to everyone
In terms of how I read those three I've already not really liked TSE (Explain others), Dunn null and Beeboy is like fine? Fine is a great way to describe him
1. I'm typically apprehensive of those who go straight into game strategy where they force us to not have an RVS. You did that and thus, took away a semi-useful phase of the game. Additionally, I was looking forward to it, as I haven't done it in forever.In post 138, beeboy wrote:Spoiler:
So I am going back towards neutral/slight sus on Starbuck. I'll explain everything for clarity since I might as well.
First quip on me is scummy, second one is towny. I can explain on request but it neutrals out so meh.
FoS tracking comment is based on a concluded conversation between me and Farside that ended with us agreeing with you, so it was a weird thing to interject yourself into. Slightly wolfy.
You also say your eager to scum hunt but you didn't really add anything new since your analysis on my opening was non committal to avoid a debate or at least that's how I felt reading it.
But since you haven't played in many years you probably need time to get the ball rolling. Which would explain roughly half my read. You could still be scum and I don't think your town, I am just not going to pretend I have information I don't have when we still have an afk.
Do you guys just not 'get' that there's no standard voting in this game? How are we supposed to rvs?In post 165, Starbuck wrote:1. I'm typically apprehensive of those who go straight into game strategy where they force us to not have an RVS. You did that and thus, took away a semi-useful phase of the game.
In post 153, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:How is it OMGUS to legit defend yourself when someone shades you?In post 152, unwnd wrote:OMGUSIn post 151, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Instead of throwing Shade how about you actually provide something to go along with it.
I don’t like you thus far.
In no way is this OMGUS.
The fact you think you can actually throw shade Willy nilly like this is hysterical.
In post 154, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Your entire ISO is full of shade.
Think that’s some kind of OMGUS?
Then look at it yourself lol.
In post 155, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:In case your unaware,
Shade = Throw Doubt
Dish
Blame
Make things look bad
Etc.
In post 156, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:How about this.
Instead of being like “Oh TSE is bad lol look at this guy”
How about you ask me a question or make me explain one of my posts.
Or maybe actually explain why your not liking me.
In post 157, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Oh btw if your scum better move your little butt outta my direction and start puppeting me now.
You have a better chance puppeting me then going balls deep into me.
Because if you end up getting the tunnel and dying, you’ll understand why you NEVER fuck with Town!TSE when your scum.
In post 158, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I don’t just catch Scum right handed.
I torcher them and make them slowly feel pain one step at a time.
And I psychotically laugh to myself because I witness a bad guy suffering.
Yeah let’s just say it’s not beneficial for players to target me unless it’s good actual timing.
In post 159, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Like I’ll admit.
If you had a case on me or you quote something of mine you didn’t like.
I’ll accept that.
It makes sense.
But just straight out Shade.
Yeah you don’t wanna play that game with me.
You should 'chill out' a littleIn post 160, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Like if you felt I was being disrespectful here, my apologies.
But just don’t do that please. Thanks.
In post 46, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Let's just play as normal.
Like, everyone had to clap to confirm their role, right?In post 142, unwnd wrote:I'm really surprised TrueSoulEnergy hasn't been buried in votes yet every post he makes is not thrilling
In post 126, farside22 wrote:Your questioning how dorky I am. You think I'm bored or your bored and wish the convo would die or i would die.In post 119, Dunnstral wrote:
I speak some fun imaginative emoji talk.
Lol shes never a good day 1 lynch. Always gets NK'd by n3 lol.In post 163, springlullaby wrote:ABR, waddya think about farsies?
I think the conversation should have, especially given the mechanics, evolved a bit more organically in any case. Can't change it now, but it should have been more of a "how do we think we should do this?" and roll from there to see what ideas came about. Not really to see if there were any other ideas, but to see who might be scummy given whatever was put on the table.In post 166, Dunnstral wrote:Do you guys just not 'get' that there's no standard voting in this game? How are we supposed to rvs?In post 165, Starbuck wrote:1. I'm typically apprehensive of those who go straight into game strategy where they force us to not have an RVS. You did that and thus, took away a semi-useful phase of the game.
Lets see thumbs up, thumps up, thumbs down, thumbs down. Going with my first response is right and my second response in the other was correct. Which means you feel bad you want me to die. But great job to me for interrupting emjoi'sIn post 169, Dunnstral wrote:In post 126, farside22 wrote:Your questioning how dorky I am. You think I'm bored or your bored and wish the convo would die or i would die.In post 119, Dunnstral wrote:
I speak some fun imaginative emoji talk.
Just so you know you are making no sense at all. You basically don't like beeboy for coming in and talking about the game but then thought it should happen more organically (which a few people did chime in with thoughts as well) so I'm not really seeing the issue you are presenting from this.Starbuck wrote:I think the conversation should have, especially given the mechanics, evolved a bit more organically in any case. Can't change it now, but it should have been more of a "how do we think we should do this?" and roll from there to see what ideas came about. Not really to see if there were any other ideas, but to see who might be scummy given whatever was put on the table.In post 166, Dunnstral wrote:Do you guys just not 'get' that there's no standard voting in this game? How are we supposed to rvs?In post 165, Starbuck wrote:1. I'm typically apprehensive of those who go straight into game strategy where they force us to not have an RVS. You did that and thus, took away a semi-useful phase of the game.
In all actuality, beeboy took that away. And for the record, I'm not stating he's scummy for it but he took away multiple opportunities for conversations to evolve and for folks to learn about others.