Mafiascum.net

I will be in and out today we just got invited to brunch so getting ready

Shiiiiit, I just lost another game, as town, caused by me. Ironically, caused by me actually analysing stuff and not just tunnelling for once.

Just lynch me now PLEASE. :'(

“Lynch me daddy”

In post 150, notscience wrote:I will be in and out today we just got invited to brunch so getting ready

brunch me daddy

You didn’t say why you voted me did you miltank

In post 155, Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

Excellent, finally someone I can trust! UNVOTE: VOTE: Battle Mage

I've had an epiphany! VOTE: Green Crayons

I have my reasons, but I'll never tell...

In post 156, notscience wrote:You didn’t say why you voted me did you miltank

And I never will

I'm bored and people love ambitious plays on Day 1, so I'm gonna go with:

Green Crayons, Malakittens, Notscience and HK50 for scum.

What the fuck is my reaction to the current battle Mages posts.

@Notty:

Right now scum wise I’m kinda getting some pings, but nothing solid as of yet. {Vot, Dunn, BM}
I have more town pings than scum pings. {HK, bob}

OMGUS Malakittens? what is your reaction to my posts?

at this rate I might actually have to explain my vote to get things moving...

In post 138, Malakittens wrote:Hm. I really did just like HK 137. But I want to see how that progresses

In post 144, Malakittens wrote:That post has a bad gut feeling, but will wait for redemption

Master Malakitten, you have made several posts showing a stance without explaining it nor fully committing to it. Please explain your pings. Has the interaction with master bob3141 reached a finite conclusion read wise considering you town ping both of us?

In post 143, Battle Mage wrote:I'll catch up later, but for now:

VOTE: HK 50 - biggest wagon and he appears to have a horrible post restriction and needs to be put out of his misery.

Efficiency: the ratio of the useful work performed by a machine or in a process to the total energy expended or heat taken in.

Known antonyms: Master Battle Mage

In post 161, Malakittens wrote:What the fuck is my reaction to the current battle Mages posts.

@Notty:

Right now scum wise I’m kinda getting some pings, but nothing solid as of yet. {Vot, Dunn, BM}
I have more town pings than scum pings. {HK, bob}

Master Malakitten, please remember the counting system of your organic species goes one two three, not one three two.

My photoreceptors see three scum pings and two town pings.

The lack of actual discussion is making my circuits moderately irritated. There cannot be ruthless slaughter like this.

VOTE: Dunnstral

Master Battle Mage feel free to explain the basis of your read.

Master Notscience what is your actual views on Master Malakitten?

In posts 70 and 74, you agree that there are posts that ping you as potentially mafia esk. However, come post 145 it seems this is no longer your current thought process.

In post 162, Battle Mage wrote:OMGUS Malakittens? what is your reaction to my posts?

I’m trying to figure where your head is at with self voting and the woe is me with the other posts. IDK the last set of posts are just coming off strange.

The whole “I’m going to do a guess” doesn’t really strike me as a real case/vote.

Then why don’t you vote me and actually get a case? I’m not scared.

I’m giving mala space bc I’m nice and also a wee bit drunk

There’s more than one way to skin a huma- a ca- an animal

In post 165, HK 50 wrote:

In post 138, Malakittens wrote:Hm. I really did just like HK 137. But I want to see how that progresses

In post 144, Malakittens wrote:That post has a bad gut feeling, but will wait for redemption

[Interrogation:

Master Malakitten, you have made several posts showing a stance without explaining it nor fully committing to it. Please explain your pings. Has the interaction with master bob3141 reached a finite conclusion read wise considering you town ping both of us?

Right now I’m liking bob’s posts. The way he’s going about is very similar to the last game we played together. I’m starting to see you scum hunting while you’re using your gimmick. A lot of players that use gimmicks hide behind it and don’t actually scum hunt. So that give me town pings.

Where as Battle Mange is the post I was referring to that felt a scum ping IMO. That’s way before he even thought I was OMGUSing him.

In post 95, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 86, Green Crayons wrote:

In post 81, Dunnstral wrote:I don't like the way you went about the early game, votato + hk50, and then the notscience vote

Is this a chronological description of Mala's play?

I'm pointing to what I didn't like.

Okay. I don't see how those three things are separate.

In post 155, Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

Not a bad vote. Someone's living up to their name.