Mafiascum.net

I'd like to generate more wagonomics, therefore having different avalible wagons is good

And the problem is that it reached E-3 without anyone really pushing for it, which makes it more likely imo that scum is on it

this can only mean truth is scum

I don't agree there, top wagons can easily be town vs town, unless there's something i'm missing?

In post 116, Dunnstral wrote:Meanwhile bugspray has a shallow push and he crumbles under pressure as scum easily

me doing this is nai and i get consistenyl just crubmel under pressure and get lynched as every alignment and if you mislynch me today i'll just have another example to provide in future games

anyway VOTE: lickety

Man, is bugspray jest?

Jester*

In post 154, bugspray wrote:anyway VOTE: lickety

Okay, little bird.

uhhhh my wim is gone
I only posted once
Bugspray can be wolf or town why am I like this
Gyp can be scum why not
All of this probably contridicts what I said earlier mbmb

ok looking at what I said earlier I came to the conclusion that bugspray is more wolfy than town
but I dont see Gyp and Bugspray being wolf friends

bug is either trolling or scum

and that comes from a slot that trolls much more than anyone should

Why walter gypyx?

Also I understand why bugspray's take was bad but dunnstral can you explain to me why you think it's bad? Just so we're on the same page

I found nothing wrong with redtea's posts, and Truth looks like guillotinebait. bugspray looks opportunistic trying to push the two of them as scum

In post 150, Gypyx wrote:I'd like to generate more wagonomics, therefore having different avalible wagons is good

And the problem is that it reached E-3 without anyone really pushing for it, which makes it more likely imo that scum is on it

I pushed for it, though

And you unvoting looks awkward

In post 155, Gypyx wrote:Man, is bugspray jest?

No, he's going to pretend he didn't see, and say if he was scum his team would have told him

In post 163, Dunnstral wrote:I found nothing wrong with redtea's posts, and Truth looks like guillotinebait. bugspray looks opportunistic trying to push the two of them as scum

Okay you're town for now

In post 165, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 155, Gypyx wrote:Man, is bugspray jest?

No, he's going to pretend he didn't see, and say if he was scum his team would have told him

my pronouns are they/them

In post 161, osuka wrote:and that comes from a slot that trolls much more than anyone should

im actualyl literally just really bad at mafia but I am always playing to wincon

superbol9 posts add nothing original and just ask really easy questions
VOTE: superbowl9

take for ecample 98there's no followup
i'd expect a town who actually wanted another player's reads to really follow up

what the fuck is 166 "for now"? he never even had shade on dunn before and is acting like a scumread is now townish

hes just asking people low ahnging fruit questions

bonus points to psyche for being a player i forgot existed and i have some psyuchological association with forgetting people are in the game and them being scum partially just because scum is low key mechanically inclined to lurk

In post 169, bugspray wrote:superbol9 posts add nothing original and just ask really easy questions
VOTE: superbowl9

take for ecample 98there's no followup
i'd expect a town who actually wanted another player's reads to really follow up

what the fuck is 166 "for now"? he never even had shade on dunn before and is acting like a scumread is now townish

hes just asking people low ahnging fruit questions

You just gonna ignore #66, #97, #136?
Dunnstral responded to 98 well enough for early game.
As for 166, don't people start as neutral? Is that not an escalation from neutral -> town? If it was originally a SR or lean would it not be maf -> neutral?

The question have is if he kept his RVS vote on purpose.

[forgot the first part of my last post whoops. Probably isn't worth including but I will jic]

well fuck, we moved on.
All I was gonna say is we can still read people based on

their

reads, plus associations with other players, so. Not being able to rely on the details for providing ai info isn't necessarily a

huge

problem, especially since they didn't claim a power role.
Anyway

In post 167, bugspray wrote:

In post 165, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 155, Gypyx wrote:Man, is bugspray jest?

No, he's going to pretend he didn't see, and say if he was scum his team would have told him

my pronouns are they/them

Riiiiiggggghhhhhtttt.

I forgot calling yourself male was offensive now.

Hey hey, let's keep it cool yeah?