Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 11:32 am
He also doesn't appear to be trying to sort you in any meaningful way even if he has realized the initial basis for his scum read wasn't as strong as he thought it was.
yeah basically thisIn post 149, dramonic wrote:ITT salt about being caught for the wrong reason.
It’s 100% on mafiascum(dot)net!In post 146, TripleHaven wrote:please don't ask about my town winrate
Most likely, considering where your vote stands!In post 152, Dannflor wrote:except we might be talking about two different slots
I mean I think that you’re hard pushing that idea yes, and the fact that you’re continuing to do so is like more evidence of thatIn post 147, Hiraki wrote:So - let's be clear. Even though you believed that there was nothing substantial behind it -In post 138, Menalque wrote:The... bit where you’ve been repeatedly calling me scum?
You decided to say that me calling you scum 4 times was a "hard" push? What exactly constitutes as a "soft" push then? Is it when you just think about the person?In post 124, Menalque wrote:But using only in-game material, you having a strong scumread on me that you’ve reiterated from what are 5 very NAI posts from me is Not A Good Look
Still looking in my dictionary btw - I think the word is operational. Hmm...no, that's not it. I'm almost there.
At that point by association with TH, at this point you've kinda just claimed all over the thread so it doesn't really matterIn post 145, Menalque wrote:Because I’d made very few posts at that point and want you to justify why you were saying you thought I was probably scum
i'll iso them
you know, no one answered my question about my replacement - the answer is that he is currently in 2 continuous games, really boggles the mind why he might have a reason to replace out other than "well one time he said that he didn't like being scum....so he replaced out because he didn't want to be scum in this playerlist!!!!!!"In post 148, Dannflor wrote:His reaction to the two of us voting him is the most egregious post I think.
i've been on this site for 10 years and some lazy poster thinks that i've figured out the game on page 5? really?In post 148, Dannflor wrote:realized it wasn't as damning as he initially thought it was
i've been on this site for 10 years and this lazy poster doesn't think i know how to backdown with poise?In post 148, Dannflor wrote:but now doesn't know how to back down from that without looking more scummy.
"appear"In post 150, Dannflor wrote:He also doesn't appear to be trying to sort you in any meaningful way even if he has realized the initial basis for his scum read wasn't as strong as he thought it was.
LOLIn post 156, Dannflor wrote:there is only one person ITT that seems salty atm
I found it! Overreaction!!In post 157, Menalque wrote:I have no idea what you’re getting at with the whole dictionary thing
One more year and you'll do it :3In post 167, Hiraki wrote:i've been on this site for 10 years and some lazy poster thinks that i've figured out the game on page 5? really?
I don't understand like, any of their posts. Just alluding to having reads without actually stating them?
In post 172, TripleHaven wrote:Just alluding to having reads without actually stating them?