Mafiascum.net

In post 149, Titus wrote:Your responses have been terrible though and much different than Manatee's mafia

Wow.
What a defense of your awful scummy vote.

Yeah such a great response to call an obvious catch up vote scummy because I hadn't read to the VC yet. Every post was a quote. You had no problem when I first cast the vote either. You're looking for a deflection target.

In post 136, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 134, Titus wrote:Isn't only scum an absolute?

...Fuck

Case in point.

Smh

That’s BS. You stated why you scumread me and it had nothing to do with "i was catching up"
If you didn’t notice then you surely did later, and you couldn’t care less because voting a town to L-1 suited you just fine.

In post 155, NorwegianboyEE wrote:That’s BS. You stated why you scumread me and it had nothing to do with "i was catching up"
If you didn’t notice then you surely did later, and you couldn’t care less because voting a town to L-1 suited you just fine.

I surely didn't care that a scumread was at l minus 1. Did I like being close to hammer on a catchup vote. No. The format is L minus 1, intent then hammer. I could have borked it up because I voted as I caught up.

You clearly show no interest in even solving my allignment unlike Trendall, i’m fairly certain you are obvscumming at this point.

It’s also a real nice scummy argument to say i’m deflecting on to you, when your actions so far have been questionable.

Plus, what even is 'deflecting'? What's the alternative - once a lot of people vote for you you're not allowed to have any further reads on anyone in the game?

I just noticed the film fact. I'm not really into films but I did watch Taxi Driver for the first time a couple of weeks ago, what a great film!

In post 159, Trendall wrote:Plus, what even is 'deflecting'? What's the alternative - once a lot of people vote for you you're not allowed to have any further reads on anyone in the game?

Deflecting is pointing at someone else to divert from his own scummy behavior.

That's exactly Norway's argument. That once L minus 1 came about, I had to be super sure rather than catching up.

Even if you knew it was a L-1 vote that doesn’t change the fact that it’s a bad vote because you haven’t even explained why my actions were so scummy that you’d risk putting an SE that could be town to L-1. (Without even calling it out) in a freaking newbie game.

I want to say something but I fear that it will come across as stupid.

In post 163, Zurel wrote:I want to say something but I fear that it will come across as stupid.

Dw it's a newbie game, you're allowed to say stupid things here.

Well, all right then.

Actually Titus, can you explain why did you scumread Norway? I can't follow the reasoning, sorry.

In post 23, Titus wrote:

In post 21, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 19, Town looter wrote:VOTE: Titus AND VOTE: Norway

You know why.

Why?

My guess is Manatee's mafia.

You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.

Manatee is the host of a previous mafia game me/Town Looter and Titus played in.
This game -> https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=83940

Oh, I see. So Looter voted both you and Titus because of that game.

You know what, I think I can understand why Titus scumread Norway.

Please don't compare my playstyle with Large 229.
Give objective reasoning that has to do with this game.
That goes for Town Looter too, assuming that's the reason you're voting me.

Never mind, I don't understand anything.

In post 135, Titus wrote:

In post 75, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 73, Salsabil Faria wrote:his/her being newbie doesn't mean that she/he has to be the townie! he/she can a newbie scum too, right? how do you reach the conclusion of his/her being townie here?

Their tone in their 3 posts so far have been very town. Newb!scum doesn't have the pre-necessitated skills to fake the type of content they've made, they just don't.
It's true that if i was scum i would know everyone's alignment beforehand. But calling out someone that could easily be elimination bait later on as town if i'm scum would be contrary to my wincon if i was mafia.

Not if you knew I wouldn't let you get away with denying his towniness.

Especially this part. I have been rereading it ten times and I can't make sense of it.

Honestly you're not the only one.

Well, good to know.

In post 115, Zurel wrote:

In post 67, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 65, Trendall wrote:Ppl saying Zurel is town need to explain why better.

the most important question is that, how do they know about Zurel's role in the first place! and Zurel, please respond, I'm eagerly waiting for your say in this

I don't even know what kind of respond you expect from me.

In post 173, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 115, Zurel wrote:

In post 67, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 65, Trendall wrote:Ppl saying Zurel is town need to explain why better.

the most important question is that, how do they know about Zurel's role in the first place! and Zurel, please respond, I'm eagerly waiting for your say in this

I don't even know what kind of respond you expect from me.

like people are arguing about your role.... how it makes you feel?

How it makes him feel? Why do you want to know that?
Also this is a game of mafia so we're supposed to argue about people's roles. Idk why that's something you feel the need to question.