Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:53 pm
lolIn post 65, Infinity 324 wrote:ydrasse you're supposed to make a joke or personable comment this ismafiathere arerules
lolIn post 65, Infinity 324 wrote:ydrasse you're supposed to make a joke or personable comment this ismafiathere arerules
Ok the truth is that you're only cute when you're crying so I have to make you cry
I got a lot of heat in probably the game i enjoyed the least ever over being "too focused on being cute over playing the game". i still dwell on it sometimes (;-ω-)In post 145, Hopkirk wrote:I'm very confused. You aren't siding with Taylor here on the 'Hopkirk isn't cute' hate train are you?
In SS2 when you say 'led to believe' it was a nomination was it phrased as though it was (yeeted/lethaled etc) like in this game or did people just assume?
i actually think he's been a bit +town for himIn post 138, Hopkirk wrote:Pooky you haven't obvtowned yet. You've obvtowned in all the other games I've played with you. Why aren't you obvtowning?
That's what I was thinking too, but I think I've only seen town!pooky with a bunch of players they know and scum!pooky with a bunch of players they weren't as familiar with. Is cuteness normally town-indicative for them?In post 154, skitter30 wrote:i actually think he's been a bit +town for himIn post 138, Hopkirk wrote:Pooky you haven't obvtowned yet. You've obvtowned in all the other games I've played with you. Why aren't you obvtowning?
maybe not like obvtown but getting some townpings
YayIn post 151, Isis wrote:Ok the truth is that you're only cute when you're crying so I have to make you cry
Please understand.
I know this might result in us having an unhealthy dynamic but I like cute
Given this is launch and Hectic has used launch in several other games to mean eliminate it looks like this is a regular vote. Condemn definitely fits as a phrasing for two possible lethal candidates.In post 152, Morning Tweet wrote:I got a lot of heat in probably the game i enjoyed the least ever over being "too focused on being cute over playing the game". i still dwell on it sometimes (;-ω-)In post 145, Hopkirk wrote:I'm very confused. You aren't siding with Taylor here on the 'Hopkirk isn't cute' hate train are you?
In SS2 when you say 'led to believe' it was a nomination was it phrased as though it was (yeeted/lethaled etc) like in this game or did people just assume?
Hectic said nothing about special mechanics at the start of Menagerie (other than giving animal noise restrictions). He used the phrasing "X to condemn" which i think was done to trick the players into thinking they were eliminating, so scum would be caught out and have to explain their actions afterwards when picking between the 2 nominees
condemn is not the word he normally uses so i guess if you were really paying attention you'd have known -- but i think the intention was to deceive. Whereas here we're being outright told we just straight up have two eliminations
isis is conftownIn post 142, Isis wrote:Hopkirk is not cute
I don't have Hectic and Flopz here for hydra based moral support so it doesn't take more than this to make me cry
Awkward?In post 161, Morning Tweet wrote:Heeeeyyy what? Pooky being adorable is a constant. he has AI traits that he has mentioned (and one i think I may have picked up), but cuteness isn't one of them
I think the bottom line for me is that cuteness shouldn't be used as an alignment indicator
pedit:looks at Hopkirk reads list
oh.. awkward....
what did u pick up on?In post 161, Morning Tweet wrote:Heeeeyyy what? Pooky being adorable is a constant. he has AI traits that he has mentioned (and one i think I may have picked up), but cuteness isn't one of them
i just got done arguing cuteness isn't AI and you made a cuteness tier list (>﹏<)In post 163, Hopkirk wrote:Awkward?In post 161, Morning Tweet wrote:Heeeeyyy what? Pooky being adorable is a constant. he has AI traits that he has mentioned (and one i think I may have picked up), but cuteness isn't one of them
I think the bottom line for me is that cuteness shouldn't be used as an alignment indicator
pedit:looks at Hopkirk reads list
oh.. awkward....
@isisIn post 143, Infinity 324 wrote:Thoughts on hopkirk reading taylor's cuteness as scummy, or is that a different situation to you?In post 117, Isis wrote:I'm not sure if TGP treating like, all of the game's content as though it came from a more serious and high information phase than it did is scummy or towny but I am pretty sure on balance it's scummy.
In post 162, Hopkirk wrote:I don't have Hectic and Flopz here for hydra based moral support so it doesn't take more than this to make me cry
Okay "pick up on" is way too much credit because i think everyone did in that particular scenarioIn post 164, skitter30 wrote:what did u pick up on?In post 161, Morning Tweet wrote:Heeeeyyy what? Pooky being adorable is a constant. he has AI traits that he has mentioned (and one i think I may have picked up), but cuteness isn't one of them
It's not scummy, hopkirk's tone is treating it as a low-information-stage read while TGP's tone is more like he's solving the game. Hopkirk is towny for taking the game from low info to high info the natural way it's supposed to goIn post 167, Infinity 324 wrote:@isisIn post 143, Infinity 324 wrote:Thoughts on hopkirk reading taylor's cuteness as scummy, or is that a different situation to you?In post 117, Isis wrote:I'm not sure if TGP treating like, all of the game's content as though it came from a more serious and high information phase than it did is scummy or towny but I am pretty sure on balance it's scummy.
Oh i interpreted it as a readlist where you substituted town/scum with cute/not cute but i didn't actually think you were reading off of cuteness dwIn post 166, Hopkirk wrote:It wasn't a tierlist, it was a summary of whether people have said and/or implied that I was or wasn't cute. I wouldn't want to rank everyone on cuteness or form reads based on it.
No, sorry ;-;In post 171, skitter30 wrote:oh i thought you had picked up on something in *this* game :/