Mafiascum.net

why would you defend a null

In post 149, unwnd wrote:The problem with nopoint I have is that he is arguing with the same process he is. It reads to me like a potential scum who didn't have prior thoughts so they just defaulted to turning the original argument against his attacker

can you phrase this another way because I don't get what you're saying here

In post 150, shellyc wrote:why would you defend a null

It's the same reason I'd defend any friend in a game honestly, I have history with Dunn and I don't think anything he's done is worth incriminating, therefore if bad arguments come towards him I am willing to give my two cents

In post 152, unwnd wrote:It's the same reason I'd defend any friend in a game honestly, I have history with Dunn and I don't think anything he's done is worth incriminating, therefore if bad arguments come towards him I am willing to give my two cents

hmmm ok but weirdly fence-sitty

In post 151, shellyc wrote:

In post 149, unwnd wrote:The problem with nopoint I have is that he is arguing with the same process he is. It reads to me like a potential scum who didn't have prior thoughts so they just defaulted to turning the original argument against his attacker

can you phrase this another way because I don't get what you're saying here

Yeah sorry it's a bit late. We're not very far into this game. There's no one who's gonna make a case or have all this incriminating evidence. It's fine to just bullshit a bit of your reads just to see what sticks, because I certainly do the same thing too. When I looked at the way Dunn/Nopoint were fighting, it wasn't that I felt Dunn was making riveting points, rather than he seem convinced of them. Nopoint on the other hand just pretty acted in the same way, but didn't seem to care about why Dunn was convinced in the first place, which in turn led into me dropping my points on his meta

Is that more understandable

yes its understandable

so you think nopoint isn't convinced about what he's putting forward and therefore is not from an uninformed pov
can you quote specific posts that lead you to this impression because i don't think acting in a consistent way is indicative of not being convinced?

IMO I'm not thinking that hard into it yet, which is why I was like 'nothing interests me.' Trying to read into who has the informed POV right now when the game is again just starting and feels barren seems like just leading yourself into a trap

I usuallyread based on tone, then my logic follows that and I fill the spaces in-between. I think tonally Nopoint's aggression seemed misplaced

VOTE: nopointactingup

This a serious vote tm

In post 142, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:

In post 13, unwnd wrote:VOTE: TheFuzzyLogic99

Expecting a lot of fuzzy logic from you, and maybe 99

as you should. I am the king of Fuzziness and Lynch bait.


Forgot to claim

You’re a roast potato? I’m unfamiliar with the role, what does it do?

In post 87, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Zzzz.. you trying not to death tunnel here shelly? Is that why you're not voting me?

Really did want an answer to this shellz

In post 104, unwnd wrote:Pointedly self-assured and unwilling to compromise for his own ideals

It's only scum when he breaks that mold in ways that give him thread brownie points

Can anyone back this up? Because I don't like the last part here

Fuzzy can be town.

Shelly jury's out.

I want to townread unwnd but maybe I just like their style, who can say?

Nopo started the game with a levity that was uncharacteristic of last time I saw him (scum) but then dove in on dunn in a way that I didn't love.

More thoughts later

do you townread dunn then?

In post 159, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 87, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Zzzz.. you trying not to death tunnel here shelly? Is that why you're not voting me?

Really did want an answer to this shellz

i have had a slow townplay style change (mentioned in multiple games) that I've been tunnelling less ever since boardgames mini normal

In post 160, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 104, unwnd wrote:Pointedly self-assured and unwilling to compromise for his own ideals

It's only scum when he breaks that mold in ways that give him thread brownie points

Can anyone back this up? Because I don't like the last part here

In post 156, unwnd wrote:IMO I'm not thinking that hard into it yet, which is why I was like 'nothing interests me.' Trying to read into who has the informed POV right now when the game is again just starting and feels barren seems like just leading yourself into a trap

I usuallyread based on tone, then my logic follows that and I fill the spaces in-between. I think tonally Nopoint's aggression seemed misplaced

quote posts that lead you to think this?

johnny im like ever-so-slightly better on because i think effort is AI for johnny

didnt mean to quote 160, i can back up the townplay part though

In post 162, shellyc wrote:do you townread dunn then?

No, actually, I think I follow flavor's whole "he seems more annoyed than is necessary" read on the dunn situation

so you dont like dunn AND the way nopoint is going after dunn?

hmmm

what are your townreads other than fuzzy?

@ NM

You are the town Fuzzy Potato, You are pretty much useless day 1. You also are lynch bait. You must claim potato or you will be squashed by a giant fork. If you live till day 3 you will be confirmed as the town potato
You win all threats to town is eliminated


Johny-
For a moment I was thinking Jamie Farr and not Johnie Farr.
huh??? Can be? lol I am town. What makes you think that . What makes you think Dunn is scummy as opposed to just being his style. Is this a meta read?

fuzzy is probtown.

this is (albeit surface-level) engagement that is not there in his scumgame

In post 167, shellyc wrote:what are your townreads other than fuzzy?

Dunno if I'd be willing to call them 'townreads' this early but I'm unwilling to vote you, fuzzy, or unwnd.

TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:What makes you think that . What makes you think Dunn is scummy as opposed to just being his style. Is this a meta read?

You're town for Flavor Titus paranoia that seemed genuine

Dunn i asked for confirmation about his style because the way unwnd described it just sounded like he acts scummy always. I've never played with them to my knowledge

In post 170, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Dunn i asked for confirmation about his style because the way unwnd described it just sounded like he acts scummy always.

Well, no.

Spicy

hello