Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 4:23 pm
I agreed with this until I remembered 121In post 139, Imperium wrote:I don’t think I’ve posted anything of substance.
I agreed with this until I remembered 121In post 139, Imperium wrote:I don’t think I’ve posted anything of substance.
What do you think of Norfolk now? Has your read on him changed since you said it?In post 90, WhemeStar wrote:Guys I was memeing about shooting Norfolk chill...
I think this is the closest you've still gotten to saying a read. Can we expect you to look harder once the game gets rolling a little bit more? Has everyone's posts looked okay to you so far?In post 133, Imperium wrote:Decent chance at least one person in that list is scum just due to the large number of scum this game.
Dunno though.
Yeah I guess in the realm of it’s a serious post, but it’s essentially a mafia theory post and easy to make so it’s not something I’d typically associate with substance.In post 150, Dunnstral wrote:I agreed with this until I remembered 121In post 139, Imperium wrote:I don’t think I’ve posted anything of substance.
I think I’ll probably read the posts before my first one tomorrow, and might have a read or two. Maybe? You’re doing the lords work with the early game pushing and questioning! I’m just getting my baseline here; I’ll get around to being serious eventually.In post 153, Duchess wrote:I think this is the closest you've still gotten to saying a read. Can we expect you to look harder once the game gets rolling a little bit more? Has everyone's posts looked okay to you so far?In post 133, Imperium wrote:Decent chance at least one person in that list is scum just due to the large number of scum this game.
Dunno though.
Fluff post =/ shit post.In post 123, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:This and the following vote are great, because the meaning should not have been in question, considering the order of the following posts (bolded for relevance)...In post 114, WhemeStar wrote:Are you saying people who don’t shit post are town?
In post 55, WhemeStar wrote:In post 54, Duchess wrote:Is there anything else beside just a bad vibe? Is there another way you can describe what you are seeing?In post 41, WhemeStar wrote:In post 30, RLotus wrote:Duchess townWhy do you townread #28? I am getting scum vibes from it.It looked like a lot of trying to do something but it was just fluff. Im bad at explaining things sorry.So, let's not fool ourselves here. Wheme's approach to me has been to actively attempt to twist my play into something that it is not. Weasel wording it to make it appear I'm fence sitting. Taking a really tortured interpretation of something I described him doing -- not to mention removing that description from its context. Etc. This sort of play normally grinds my gears, but Wheme's approach to it is so boneless and ineffective that I mostly just want to dunk on him for it. But is it alignment indicative? Hmmmm, not so sure.In post 77, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:--snip for readability--
I don't really like anything I'm seeing of Wheme so far. So, Wheme, I have a question for you. What /are/ you bringing to the table here? So far we have bad reads but wants the gun,casting entirely baseless shade on one of the few players posting anything substantive(no offense intended to the players who have not posted anything substantive, game basically just started), and shitposting. What do you have that town benefits from? Don't dodge the question or meme about it, I want an honest self-assessment. What are you actually doing in this game to help town out?
Someone town desperately trying to get the gun at any and all costs, up to and including the town turning their back on them entirely, is a very real possibility. Anti-town as fuck and all but guaranteed to lead to utter disaster, but still, very possible.
Then again, gambiting scum? Not impossible, especially if they're the Godfather -- someone taking them up on their offer has /some/ utility. That would be awfully telling in a lot of ways, though, so it's no guarantee itself.
How do you agree with someone who isn’t voting me and hasn’t called me scum and then vote me?
Does it matter? Votes are meaningless.In post 159, WhemeStar wrote:How do you agree with someone who isn’t voting me and hasn’t called me scum and then vote me?
Who said that?In post 160, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:Anyone suggesting a committee or that votes should decide the shot is a scum candidate for me.
At first I did think Duchess was towny, but after wheme said the stuff about how Duchess' post was fluffy I kinda saw what he was saying. But, this post is really what freaked me out with them. He directly sheeped the reads I was having at the time which makes them seem disingenuous. Along with the fact that he had all the opportunity to give a read about norfolk but waited until others explained their read of him. With his read on whemestar, I think he was jumping the gun in calling it an act. All he had said at that point was "shoot me" and some nullish things. While saying that you want to be shot is LAMISTy, I don't see how you can come to the conclusion that it is an act based just on that. How Duchess so quickly jumped on that looked very scummy to me. And the way he has focused on Whemestar makes it seem like they are diverting attention away from Norfolk. This association might be a reach, but it feels strange to me anyway.In post 52, Duchess wrote:To me Norfolk looks like he is overcompensating for something he did that he knows looks scummy on the surface, so I agree with both of you if that makes any sense. I also agree that Whemestar's eager attitude looks like an act to me.
Another bad Norfolk postIn post 160, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:I'm not digging ScrewTheTells jumping in and claiming it's suspicious that i'm not posting when it's Sunday night in the UK.
Anyone suggesting a committee or that votes should decide the shot is a scum candidate for me.
The only confirmed town is Netflix, so Netflix should decide.
I'm mainly referring to their first post about how everyone should vote. It looks meant to appear as if they are invested in the game without actually committing to any reads. In hindsight it looks even worse given that he supposedly reads norfolk scummy yet didn't bother giving a read on him even though every post that norfolk made between the start of the game and when Duchess called him scummy were posted before Duchess' "fluffy" post.In post 169, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I haven't seen anyone but you and Wheme talk about Duchess posting fluff. I'm seeing the opposite there. You'll need to explain how it's fluffy.
Well, it mainly comes from a general vibe I'm getting about the gamestate. It seems to me that several people are pushing onto Norfolk and naturally scum are trying to push into a different direction. Duchess' seemingly disingenuous push onto Wheme fits the bill. Again, I can very well be wrong, it's a preliminary read. But, there does seem to be something strange going on in that area.In post 169, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Also, it's not even ten pages and 48 hours in and you're making associative reads? PUBLIC associative reads, no less? I'm also gonna need you to explain /that/ for me.
Glad we can resume our normal hostilities so quickly.In post 171, Albert B. Rampage wrote:shoot sircakez imo