Mafiascum.net

In post 146, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:

In post 144, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 129, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:Why is it NAI in this case?

Just cause I see how someone could think that

Why specifically for shadow, as your post seems to imply?

Can you respond to my second question as well?

- Daenerys

I was just trying to make it clear who I was talking about

I'll respond to the second question once shadow answers 142

In post 127, Dumb and Dumber wrote:

In post 110, MURDERCAT wrote:Can we talk more about skitter instead

Murdercat was this abt me or shadowslug?

Shadow

ugh you made me get on a computer for this one

In post 60, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm skeptical of "this person is vibing in the early game therefore they're town" reads, they may work for some people but in general I haven't found them to be accurate.

in this post, i read this as infinity saying my read on yyotta was based on feeling that she was 'vibing in the early game and therefore she's town', but that's not what my yyotta read was based on (it was, however, similar to the reasoning i gave for lilith, which is why i asked who he was talking abt in that post)

that's why i said i disagreed (or whatever i said), because while i did make the yyotta read, this wasn't the reasoning behind it, and i wanted to make sure he got it right / wasn't confused

(i'm like actually attempting to use words to explain things instead of just making vague declarative statements without further elaboration, everyone should be v proud)

~ skitter

#proudpenguin

In post 142, Infinity 324 wrote:Shadow, why was lilith saying "can we talk about" in 116 scummy but murder saying "can we talk about skitter" not?

Missed this

Uhh I missed this actually, but I don't mind Murder since he thinks there might be value in pushing skitter a bit and seemed content with letting that play out and didn't like you guys switching focus

In post 152, Dumb and Dumber wrote:making vague declarative statements without further elaboration

Perhaps our styles are more similar than I realized

In post 154, shadowslug wrote:he thinks there might be value in pushing skitter a bit and seemed content with letting that play out and didn't like you guys switching focus

This isn't really what I was doing but that's ok

In post 133, Green Crayons wrote:I’m scrunching my nose.

This seems too easy.

So fake lol

how can you be so confident rather than asking questions like Infinity is doing

You literally quoted a post where I am questioning my read.

In post 154, shadowslug wrote:

In post 142, Infinity 324 wrote:Shadow, why was lilith saying "can we talk about" in 116 scummy but murder saying "can we talk about skitter" not?

Missed this

Uhh I missed this actually, but I don't mind Murder since he thinks there might be value in pushing skitter a bit and seemed content with letting that play out and didn't like you guys switching focus

I like shadow for town, this post and 149 feel like trying to explain gut reads

@lilith 121 is maybe slightly scum-indicative in general, cause it makes sense for scum to lash back there, but eh

Ok skitter so why didn't you explain why Yyotta's post is not a scum one

In post 59, Dumb and Dumber wrote:@infinity i have exactly no meta on yyotta but it doesnt feel like a post scum makes

~ skitter

In post 159, Green Crayons wrote:You literally quoted a post where I am questioning my read.

Questioning your read why? Because it seems so easy? that's bullcrap reasoning

In post 160, Infinity 324 wrote:this post and 149 feel like trying to explain gut reads

To explain this better, I feel like scum would feel more obligated to address the apparent "contradiction" I brought up in 142 but instead he's just saying what he thinks

Using words gang

In post 162, Dumb and Dumber wrote:

In post 59, Dumb and Dumber wrote:@infinity i have exactly no meta on yyotta but it doesnt feel like a post scum makes

~ skitter

Lol

But WHYYYY? Why can't scum prepare a post like that one?

In post 148, Green Crayons wrote:^^^ that’s probably town sort mentality even if it’s wrong on me and prob shadow

VOTE: GC

Let's try this

In post 163, shadowslug wrote:

In post 159, Green Crayons wrote:You literally quoted a post where I am questioning my read.

Questioning your read why? Because it seems so easy? that's bullcrap reasoning

Why is it bullcrap?

i don't fully know how to explain that one, it just doesn't

it's just like a little too 'bold' for (newb) scum to make i think; scum would have to feel p darn comfortable to have an entrance like that, and i'm not sure i see it

~ skitter

If it feels like there may be a flaw in your read then that's worth pursuing

But rather than question/make a post that would further develop your thoughts you choose to post a "Hmm guys Im totally reconsidering rn"

Ur being scummy

In post 164, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 160, Infinity 324 wrote:this post and 149 feel like trying to explain gut reads

To explain this better, I feel like scum would feel more obligated to address the apparent "contradiction" I brought up in 142 but instead he's just saying what he thinks

Using words gang

Don’t see how 154 isn’t exactly what you said it isn’t.

I don’t think 154 is indicative either way but I’m not seeing how it assuages concerns.

In post 169, shadowslug wrote:If it feels like there may be a flaw in your read then that's worth pursuing

But rather than question/make a post that would further develop your thoughts you choose to post a "Hmm guys Im totally reconsidering rn"

Ur being scummy

My post is developing my thoughts.

I don’t have to engage you when others are doing it.

My 133 is flagging that maybe you’re just playing like a bad new town player instead of a scum new player.

In post 169, shadowslug wrote:If it feels like there may be a flaw in your read then that's worth pursuing

But rather than question/make a post that would further develop your thoughts you choose to post a "Hmm guys Im totally reconsidering rn"

Ur being scummy

Early town reads are good. Calling early town reads scummy is scummy

In post 170, Green Crayons wrote:Don’t see how 154 isn’t exactly what you said it isn’t.

I don’t think 154 is indicative either way but I’m not seeing how it assuages concerns.

The best way I can explain it is that it's framed as "here's what I thought about murder" and not "here's why I'm not contradicting myself"