Mafiascum.net

top

Teamwork

VOTE: Flubbernugget

E-1.

why?

I don’t really have much to say right now, but wanted to see how things progressed from there.

do you scumread flubber?

Yeah.

then you can say something about that?

Meh.

Bad opening, and the few posts that follow feel like he’s trying to put on an outraged “you guys don’t see this!?” act with everyone.

In post 158, Vulture wrote:Meh.

Bad opening, and the few posts that follow feel like he’s trying to put on an

outraged “you guys don’t see this!?”

act with everyone.

I feel like Vulture is swooping in like a Vulture

In post 159, Seanzie wrote:

In post 158, Vulture wrote:Meh.

Bad opening, and the few posts that follow feel like he’s trying to put on an

outraged “you guys don’t see this!?”

act with everyone.

Why is this scummy in your opinion? I often get frustrated when I feel like I see something and others aren't paying attention.

My theory is that Flubber felt like they had to double-down and try and 'convince' others and look like a frustrated townie when their logic wasn't going over well.

In post 161, Vulture wrote:

In post 159, Seanzie wrote:

In post 158, Vulture wrote:Meh.

Bad opening, and the few posts that follow feel like he’s trying to put on an

outraged “you guys don’t see this!?”

act with everyone.

Why is this scummy in your opinion? I often get frustrated when I feel like I see something and others aren't paying attention.

My theory is that Flubber felt like they had to double-down and try and 'convince' others and look like a frustrated townie when their logic wasn't going over well.

Oh, okay, so namely the action was faked, rather than the action itself is scummy?

Does anyone think Flubber is townie?

i actually got some townie pings from his posting upon his return. my mind completely skipped over 12 at first, so upon that elaboration, i can see town!flubber going mad at someone "lying" about their push.

opening his iso, don't think he looks *great* exactly, talking only about seanzie and nothing else isn't a great look, which is why i'm fine with him being on y-1 to see what happens and i'm not losing my mind over a possible quickhammer.

In post 163, Aristeia wrote:Does anyone think Flubber is townie?

I could do a trustfall without much trouble, but I wouldn't call them townie. I don't think hammering early is a good idea though.

In post 164, Datisi wrote:i actually got some townie pings from his posting upon his return. my mind completely skipped over 12 at first, so upon that elaboration, i can see town!flubber going mad at someone "lying" about their push.

opening his iso, don't think he looks *great* exactly, talking only about seanzie and nothing else isn't a great look, which is why i'm fine with him being on y-1 to see what happens and i'm not losing my mind over a possible quickhammer.

well if you say so

UNVOTE: Flubber

In post 164, Datisi wrote:opening his iso, don't think he looks *great* exactly, talking only about seanzie and nothing else isn't a great look, which is why i'm fine with him being on y-1 to see what happens and i'm not losing my mind over a possible quickhammer.

I mean I've got seanzie/umalut pegged for scum before page 10 so I'm not sure what your concern is

like how much "this is why the other posters don't ping me" do u want before it turns into thread clog

In post 168, Flubbernugget wrote:like how much "this is why the other posters don't ping me" do u want before it turns into thread clog

you've explained why other people don't ping you or what your read on someone (not named seanzie or umlaut) is exactly... zero times. i know absolutely nothing about your thoughts other than "seanzie lied" and "umlaut is chainsawing", and even with those, i'm really skepitcal you can genuinely lockscum someone that fast with that reasoning. the aggression, confidence, and anti-survivalism will only get you so far.

In post 127, Titus wrote:

In post 115, T3 wrote:

In post 114, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 112, Flubbernugget wrote:

In post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.

More votes on Flub plz

so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrong

What do you think of my idea that Seanzie may have been testing to see who would try defending/pocketing me?

That's a 400iq strat that people don't do.

I'd do it.

Pretty sure you play outside the norm of where most players do, so you might not be a good bench mark lol

Datisis feels town to me.

Now that Flubber has explained more, I think their thought process seems genuine, even thought I disagree with their conclusions.

I am not liking that Aristeia keeps asking other people before she votes/unvotes, like she is absolving herself of her votes.

VOTE: Aristeia

In post 171, Lukewarm wrote:Datisis feels town to me.

Now that Flubber has explained more, I think their thought process seems genuine, even thought I disagree with their conclusions.

I am not liking that Aristeia keeps asking other people before she votes/unvotes, like she is absolving herself of her votes.

VOTE: Aristeia

I think that's part of the alt gimmick.

In post 172, T3 wrote:I think that's part of the alt gimmick.

Doesn't mean I am willing to let them just avoid having any reads of their own

,