Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2021 9:50 am
why are you voting me, bingle?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
for example?In post 152, Bingle wrote:you seem to be selectively engaging in things that aren't really AI.
Strange responseIn post 142, Titus wrote:I didn't care.In post 141, ta vera wrote:what about the back and forth between me and The Emperor? mechanics talk isn't the only thing that has been happening. it was only a piece for a little bit.
Explain what you mean by avoiding thread progression? I've read the frog as proactiveIn post 148, Bingle wrote:You think the functionally V/LA Titus is the one to push over avoiding thread progression?In post 144, Green Cap Boys wrote:VOTE: titus
"trying to keep the game in rvs for longer instead of doing something to get us out of it" feels like one of those reasoning that almost never works, but i'm running with it for now.
-D
Don’t hate votes on Titus.In post 154, The Emperor wrote:Strange responseIn post 142, Titus wrote:I didn't care.In post 141, ta vera wrote:what about the back and forth between me and The Emperor? mechanics talk isn't the only thing that has been happening. it was only a piece for a little bit.
VOTE: Titus
In post 51, ta vera wrote:the obvious question here is: is this a real townslip?In post 8, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Do mafia have a nightkill or do they just toss poison at people.
In post 67, ta vera wrote:i find that being weird can actually garner town reads sometimes. and, i think weirdness is more of a personality thing than something someone does as a strategy.
In post 68, ta vera wrote:meta can be good.
All of these lines of interaction seem to me like they're aimed at going no where. You've got the noncommital question about a 'townslip' that has already been called out (It wasn't a townslip, btw, it was a question scumNorwee could also have had), a "That's NAI.", generic comments about nothing (meta can be good), and a nothingburger response to Norwee's meta. Also, the mechstuff, even if prompted.In post 74, ta vera wrote:oh. i've never played with scum dwlee.In post 71, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Dwlee seemed like a very efficient robot as scum in the last game we had.
The former wasn't about vera, it was about Titus. I was wondering if GCB would back off when I pointed out Titus had said she wouldn't be around much yesterday.In post 155, The Emperor wrote:Explain what you mean by avoiding thread progression? I've read the frog as proactive
how does me backing off or not backing off impact your read on me?In post 160, Bingle wrote:I was wondering if GCB would back off when I pointed out Titus had said she wouldn't be around much yesterday.
the point of the comments wasn't to read the people they were about, it was to respond to The Emperor to understand where he's coming from. it has lead to my scumread on The Emperor which you left out here. Speaking of which, why does no one want to comment on that?In post 159, Bingle wrote: All of these lines of interaction seem to me like they're aimed at going no where. You've got the noncommital question about a 'townslip' that has already been called out (It wasn't a townslip, btw, it was a question scumNorwee could also have had), a "That's NAI.", generic comments about nothing (meta can be good), and a nothingburger response to Norwee's meta. Also, the mechstuff, even if prompted.
It feels more like she wants to be seen as doing something more than actually wanting to do something.
ok, i will comment on that. early on in the game, the emperor's 34 gave me vague scumpings, mostly the way he called retti townie felt a bit off / tmi-y. i told this to retti, who talked me out of it because he thought it was nai. *however*, we've agreed that that's probably a +town event for ta vera (coupled with ta vera's later read on the emperor), since the two of us saw him pretty similarly, and something something mindmeld.In post 162, ta vera wrote:the point of the comments wasn't to read the people they were about, it was to respond to The Emperor to understand where he's coming from. it has lead to my scumread on The Emperor which you left out here. Speaking of which, why does no one want to comment on that?
i think it was about the way you started catching up, at first it felt to me that you're commenting on all the unimportant posts, without giving out any *actually* game-relevant reads. looking over your iso now, i'm not sure exactly what gave me the impression, since back then i was reacting in real-time, and i didn't get that feeling during my reread later, so /shrug.In post 163, ta vera wrote:do you remember why you had scum pings on me, datisi?
i personally didn't/don't have an alignment opinion on it, but i can see where you're coming from.In post 165, ta vera wrote:what about his town read on dwlee?
Is this because Who isn't posting itt?
My thinking was that if they were going "oh I have excess potions I want to give them to someone else if I can so that they can use them" then that'd be a towny sort of thought process.In post 117, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:How would it have been a towntell?In post 111, Green Cap Boys wrote:Thought that might've been a towntell. Disappointing.
- lilith
At the time, I wasn't sure how it would and was just fishing for reactions. You expanding with the "She's posting elsewhere" bit was mildly town.In post 161, Green Cap Boys wrote:how does me backing off or not backing off impact your read on me?
Do you have additional reasons, or is it just the TMI bit?In post 157, ta vera wrote:i'm still not liking The Emperor.
Ok, Bingle already said this earlier.In post 167, The Limit Does Not Exist wrote:I've traveled here from the future to inform you that 8 is not a townslip.
-S