Mafiascum.net

In post 27, T3 wrote:

In post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:I’m a Miller btw

Same here! Don't we also have a masonry? Why haven't you posted in there?

i don't think this post sounds believeable at all and pretending it does is weird as hell to me, and if t3 is green i think kyouko deserves a closer look

rereading the t3 claim, not only is mason miller a nonsense role combination, he's apparently outing his mason buddy too, and how can you think any of this is serious

actually yeah
VOTE: kyouko

mason miller immediately outing his partner makes no sense

scum locking themself into such a powerful claim so early on makes even less sense

I didn't remember 27. My vote is solely because T3 tried to claim something that is not likely in a daytalk active setup and is now trying to walk it back as a joke

like, if you're a miller, ok
if you're mason miller, why out that you're also a mason
if you're outing that you're a mason, why out a partner as well

if you're mafia seriously fakeclaiming for no reason, why the hell would you do any of that

and going "yeah that seemed like a serious scum fakeclaim to me" feels like it's coming from scum who's grasping at reasons to wagon someone rather than town actually thinking things through

I think it was serious, because it sounds like the kind of convoluted role that gypyx normally puts into his games. Outside of a gypyx game, where N_M hasn't already claimed Miller, I'd believe it's a joke. In this case though I think it's clear he's walking back a gambit gone wrong.

In post 151, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I didn't remember 27. My vote is solely because T3 tried to claim something that is not likely in a daytalk active setup and is now trying to walk it back as a joke

ok, now that i have reminded you, what is your opinion on t3?

pedit: very well then
still completely missing my point but ok

Kyo I think even if t3 is evil this push would be for the wrong reasons
Stay on Margot @datisi

In post 153, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I think it was serious, because it sounds like the kind of convoluted role that gypyx normally puts into his games. Outside of a gypyx game, where N_M hasn't already claimed Miller, I'd believe it's a joke. In this case though I think it's clear he's walking back a gambit gone wrong.

like just because it's somewhat more likely a convoluted role combination such as that exists, it still doesn't mean that it's pro-town for town to actually claim it or pro-scum for scum to fakeclaim it, which means it's still blatantly more likely to be a joke

like which scum player seriously fakeclaims main with a buddy on page three or whatever for literal no reason aahhhh

fakeclaims mason*

knowing my luck t3 is scum who was making a joke and i'll look like an idiot on d2

In post 158, Datisi wrote:fakeclaims mason*

knowing my luck t3 is scum who was making a joke and i'll look like an idiot on d2

Exactly
Margot is best vote rn

In post 155, Dwlee99 wrote:Stay on Margot @datisi

convince me kyouko isn't purposefully being ignorant about the likelihood of scum seriously claiming mason unprovoked on pg3 and i'll switch back tomorrow morning

i need to sleep now, see ya

Someone isn't scum because they don't detect a joke

In post 152, Datisi wrote:like, if you're a miller, ok
if you're mason miller, why out that you're also a mason
if you're outing that you're a mason, why out a partner as well

if you're mafia seriously fakeclaiming for no reason, why the hell would you do any of that

and going "yeah that seemed like a serious scum fakeclaim to me" feels like it's coming from scum who's grasping at reasons to wagon someone rather than town actually thinking things through

You argue that T3 making that claim would never actually be done by scum, but it's just as easily argued that scum would never actually believe a town player would make that claim, which is what you're accusing me of now.

You say I'm scum that is grasping for reasons to push T3. If you think it's ridiculous or unbelievable that I actually think T3 is lying here, but you dont realize that what you are postulating looks just as ridiculous, you're the one not thinking clearly.

Going to have to disagree with you on T3.

In post 154, Datisi wrote:

In post 151, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I didn't remember 27. My vote is solely because T3 tried to claim something that is not likely in a daytalk active setup and is now trying to walk it back as a joke

ok, now that i have reminded you, what is your opinion on t3?

pedit: very well then
still completely missing my point but ok

27 reinforces that it could have been a joke, but the reactionary vote does not sit right. It's not in good faith to omgus someone that missed the joke. You run that risk making a joke about roles and when it's misinterpreted the appropriate response is to clear up the misunderstanding.

it was a complete joke not a reaction test, but kyo miserably failed the reaction test.

In post 150, Datisi wrote:

In post 27, T3 wrote:

In post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:I’m a Miller btw

Same here! Don't we also have a masonry? Why haven't you posted in there?

i don't think this post sounds believeable at all and pretending it does is weird as hell to me, and if t3 is green i think kyouko deserves a closer look

rereading the t3 claim, not only is mason miller a nonsense role combination, he's apparently outing his mason buddy too, and how can you think any of this is serious

actually yeah
VOTE: kyouko

mason miller immediately outing his partner makes no sense

scum locking themself into such a powerful claim so early on makes even less sense

town

In post 166, T3 wrote:

In post 150, Datisi wrote:

In post 27, T3 wrote:

In post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:I’m a Miller btw

Same here! Don't we also have a masonry? Why haven't you posted in there?

i don't think this post sounds believeable at all and pretending it does is weird as hell to me, and if t3 is green i think kyouko deserves a closer look

rereading the t3 claim, not only is mason miller a nonsense role combination, he's apparently outing his mason buddy too, and how can you think any of this is serious

actually yeah
VOTE: kyouko

mason miller immediately outing his partner makes no sense

scum locking themself into such a powerful claim so early on makes even less sense

town

Shallow

In post 167, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 166, T3 wrote:

In post 150, Datisi wrote:

In post 27, T3 wrote:

In post 25, Not_Mafia wrote:I’m a Miller btw

Same here! Don't we also have a masonry? Why haven't you posted in there?

i don't think this post sounds believeable at all and pretending it does is weird as hell to me, and if t3 is green i think kyouko deserves a closer look

rereading the t3 claim, not only is mason miller a nonsense role combination, he's apparently outing his mason buddy too, and how can you think any of this is serious

actually yeah
VOTE: kyouko

mason miller immediately outing his partner makes no sense

scum locking themself into such a powerful claim so early on makes even less sense

town

Shallow

unironic yes

In post 70, MargotRosa wrote:@Dwlee Sorry, I just read through page 3 properly lol. I didn't realise you had been conf towned by a conf town

What did you mean by this? You arent even voting Dwlee at this point so why apologize to him?

In post 164, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: Roden

This isn't as funny the second time unfortunately

It wasnt a joke the first time

What makes you think I'm scum?

I think the hop on mewtaph is opportunistic, your posts thus far are shorter than I expect to see out of town!you, though maybe it's too
early to tell on that front.

I also feel like you sort of egged on the vote on T3 but when datisi began questioning it you big dipped on the thread. This could be a coincidence though and primarily I'm voting you because the mewtaph vote looks opportunistic.

I'm not buying it Kyo. Anything to convince me?