Mafiascum.net

In post 146, Dorsey wrote:I'm comfortable voting anyone that's not Norway - they had the first votes.

What do you even mean by this??

In post 148, Deimos27 wrote:

In post 73, Dorsey wrote:Is the first elimination always town? Because how are you supposed to know who's who?

Because I find it easier to believe that this is scum poorly faking noobtown than town with two completed games already still making such a noobish comment.

Have you done any meta? I mean I know that I liked pulling noob cards a lot when I first started out. So I see what you mean but at the same time, I also think most people actually start out with a bunch of town games so are naturally a little more lost.

In post 151, Noraa wrote:I liked pulling noob cards a lot

as scum typically

In post 148, Deimos27 wrote:

In post 73, Dorsey wrote:Is the first elimination always town? Because how are you supposed to know who's who?

Because I find it easier to believe that this is scum poorly faking noobtown than town with two completed games already still making such a noobish comment.

to me it seemed like Dorsey brought the question up because of having experienced a repeated pattern with limited data. That's how I understood it.

In post 137, Deimos27 wrote:Even for page 6 I think you are concerningly IIoA. There's an obsessiveness with self-meta and a complete absence of any semblance of an attempt to sort another player

Maybe because that's exactly what I was doing? Specifically shooting down weird analysis with easily accessible information?

"complete absence of any semblance of an attempt to sort another player"
did you want me to sr you or TA or something?
I'm not as into voting people for rvs talk as some. Clearly.

*that's to say besides you and ta, there wasn't much else to comment on except football or whatever, in my opinion

In post 155, redtea wrote:

In post 137, Deimos27 wrote:Even for page 6 I think you are concerningly IIoA. There's an obsessiveness with self-meta and a complete absence of any semblance of an attempt to sort another player

Maybe because that's exactly what I was doing? Specifically shooting down weird analysis with easily accessible information?

okay, never mind. You're right. It's only worth anything if meta is something someone wants to or has the time to do. And if they don't then yeah, what I'm saying is useless. If I had accompanying commentary that didn't require that extra reading it would be one thing, but I didn't.

I got annoyed people don't automatically want to play the way I'm playing and it was dumb. If you pings were felt from whatever was in my first few posts you got pings. And if you get pings from THIS post, that's how it is.

I apologize.

Do u have READS

Also, happy b-day Redtea.

all I have to say is I'm wary of trying to read Deimos early after our last game so I'm not gonna have anything there for a while.

otherwsie- nope
but I can see how many people I can convince to vote nm with me VOTE: notmafiaVOTE: notmafiaVOTE: notmafiaVOTE: notmafia

tyyy, didn't even realize it was past midnight

In post 73, Dorsey wrote:Is the first elimination always town? Because how are you supposed to know who's who?

Majority of the time it is town because town have the majority. But it's not exactly a bad thing if it does end up being town who is eliminated, it can sometimes end up for the greater good.

In post 93, Deimos27 wrote:Two words: temporal scope.

If redtea said that it's likelier for town to be eliminated

today

because

they

are the majority, I'd be jumping for joy. But given that they instead made the generalised claim that town is

always

the likelier elimination, I see "they" as a far more natural and grammatical pronoun than "we", because games where redtea either isn't playing or isn't town-aligned are included in "always".

This is a town post, with a town perspective/mindset.

In post 116, Noraa wrote:I haven't read up and dont really plan to but idk what ur on. NM has some pretty sexy reads despite the fact that he doesn't post much. So get ur facts straight.

VOTE: Noraa

This pinging me.

In post 161, redtea wrote:but I can see how many people I can convince to vote nm with me

Why do you want N_M?

Imo, N_M is one of those players you always leave for last. Like if no scum team makes sense with anyone except N_M then i guess he’s scum.

I'm starting to think that's the case, but I thought I'd give this a try.

In post 163, Kop wrote:

In post 73, Dorsey wrote:Is the first elimination always town? Because how are you supposed to know who's who?

Majority of the time it is town because town have the majority. But it's not exactly a bad thing if it does end up being town who is eliminated, it can sometimes end up for the greater good.

In post 93, Deimos27 wrote:Two words: temporal scope.

If redtea said that it's likelier for town to be eliminated

today

because

they

are the majority, I'd be jumping for joy. But given that they instead made the generalised claim that town is

always

the likelier elimination, I see "they" as a far more natural and grammatical pronoun than "we", because games where redtea either isn't playing or isn't town-aligned are included in "always".

This is a town post, with a town perspective/mindset.

In post 116, Noraa wrote:I haven't read up and dont really plan to but idk what ur on. NM has some pretty sexy reads despite the fact that he doesn't post much. So get ur facts straight.

VOTE: Noraa

This pinging me.

This is pinging me.

I'm town

I'm sure you are not mafia

In post 168, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm town

Question.
Have you ever said: "Yes, i am mafia" in a game, if you actually were?

Yep

In post 149, Noraa wrote:

In post 144, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well i don’t see the tsunami yet.

We can't be friends no more.

In post 151, Noraa wrote:

In post 148, Deimos27 wrote:

In post 73, Dorsey wrote:Is the first elimination always town? Because how are you supposed to know who's who?

Because I find it easier to believe that this is scum poorly faking noobtown than town with two completed games already still making such a noobish comment.

Have you done any meta? I mean I know that I liked pulling noob cards a lot when I first started out. So I see what you mean but at the same time, I also think most people actually start out with a bunch of town games so are naturally a little more lost.

I did no more than glance at those games to make sure it was in fact town who got eliminated D1. I'd say after Dorsey's subsequent posts the tell has further deteriorated in value because they have shown their mentality is going to remain consistent.

In post 159, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Do u have READS

I don't feel the need to respond to redtea's posts this page because I think Norwee summarised my point very well here.

And it's not just "do you have reads", it's "where have you shown that you are trying to generate reads", y'know.

I get that most of the content so far is RVS and there are other players who have lacking analysis but redtea is one of us who has posted the most so I was hoping for from them.