Mafiascum.net

I took the opportunity to join a better wagon than gamma.
118 pinged me as weird before ssbm brought up the rest

In post 149, Roden wrote:You say we're oppotunistic for voting you. By those same standards, do you not consider your own votes and pushes opportunistic?

In post 50, numberQ wrote:Well it says "Mafia Scum" under Roden's username so I think you're onto something.

VOTE: Roden

In post 52, Not_Mafia wrote:Unironically Roden is scum

In post 53, numberQ wrote:Then vote them

In post 94, numberQ wrote:VOTE: Gamma

He said there was nothing important to discuss so let's make something to discuss.

The only one of those that's close to opportunistic is the last one. I strongly believe one of the best ways to drive early discussion is to throw wagons around and see what discussions fall out. Case in point, this wagon on me has produced a discussion that is making me TR you.

Conversely, getting a scum vibe from Meg's reactions to everything.

In post 152, numberQ wrote:Conversely, getting a scum vibe from Meg's reactions to everything.

Do tell

Is it opportunistic when you announce the exact reason why your doing it and it doesn’t end up being false?

Oh hey new page

In post 154, PenguinPower wrote:Is it opportunistic when you announce the exact reason why your doing it and it doesn’t end up being false?

It being opportunistic or not is unrelated to either of those things.

Unassailable Meg scum case:

The vibes they are giving off are scummy.

VOTE: MegAzumarill

In post 119, MegAzumarill wrote:

In post 118, numberQ wrote:Why, what's a vanilla townie gonna tell us about the setup?

Why do you think gamma is a VT?

Prolly because I hadn’t explicitly claimed PR when at risk of being voted out
But like, Q’s response to my post in general was just like, bad lol. I’m more talking about when I flip town y’all need to think about why there’s this sudden compulsion from Enchant to hammer me. I saw similar shit from him in White Flag, he ended up winning as scum. DO NOT LET HIM OPENWOLF FOR GOD’S SAKE.

In post 137, redtea wrote:is gamma flipped or not
UNVOTE:
at work will be back later

Ur also probscum

In post 152, numberQ wrote:Conversely, getting a scum vibe from Meg's reactions to everything.

Meg is like, universally scummy
I have like 3 completed games with her (she was town in 2 scum in 1) and every time she ended up looking sus

Gotta say this is not the Tarot rerun I was hoping it would be

Smh, what is up with people trying to end the day early...
Phone posting rn, but later I wanna take a closer look at all that happened last night.

In post 156, numberQ wrote:

In post 154, PenguinPower wrote:Is it opportunistic when you announce the exact reason why your doing it and it doesn’t end up being false?

It being opportunistic or not is unrelated to either of those things.

uh…..ok. It’s not opportunistic if the reason for your action has basis and is not simply because the opportunity presents itself.

Vc

In post 163, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 156, numberQ wrote:

In post 154, PenguinPower wrote:Is it opportunistic when you announce the exact reason why your doing it and it doesn’t end up being false?

It being opportunistic or not is unrelated to either of those things.

uh…..ok. It’s not opportunistic if the reason for your action has basis and is not simply because the opportunity presents itself.

Someone can place a vote and give it a reason, and still be doing so opportunistically. That's how they try and hide the opportunism. Scum will not just be trying to come up with fake reads on people, but also try to time it right to keep up the momentum. So they will often hold back on saying things until the opportunity presents itself.

In post 99, redtea wrote:

In post 86, numberQ wrote:

In post 82, redtea wrote:I'm gonna unvote before this turns into a Thing
UNVOTE:

Considering no other things have happened or are happening, I say thing it up. Why is your vote better off the wagon than on it?

I'm trying to be a

little

more selective in my thinging

In post 100, redtea wrote:VOTE: gamma

that's me, being selective

Come on, that had to have been deliberate.

VOTE: redtea

In post 133, Enchant wrote:

In post 132, Roden wrote:

In post 130, Enchant wrote:

In post 128, Roden wrote:Also Enchant wtf are you doing

I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.

Ok, but why do you want a quick hammer? And why is Meg posting emojis enough to stop you from quick hammering?

Why not?

Idk, honestly. Seems like i turned in wimp with high empathy when i am sleepy. Mostly i really don't care.

Why i am not sleeping?

Weeeeeeell! I need to go now seems.

This is also terrible.

Side note: Roden is prob town for actually having common sense around the whole quickhammer situation, and also Azumarill to a lesser extent.

In post 165, numberQ wrote:

In post 163, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 156, numberQ wrote:

In post 154, PenguinPower wrote:Is it opportunistic when you announce the exact reason why your doing it and it doesn’t end up being false?

It being opportunistic or not is unrelated to either of those things.

uh…..ok. It’s not opportunistic if the reason for your action has basis and is not simply because the opportunity presents itself.

Someone can place a vote and give it a reason, and still be doing so opportunistically. That's how they try and hide the opportunism. Scum will not just be trying to come up with fake reads on people, but also try to time it right to keep up the momentum. So they will often hold back on saying things until the opportunity presents itself.

i mean my comment was initially about your posing but you're leaning into this weird

I like how this game has nothing going on but everybody's pretending that it's ongoing and forming wagons that get to E-1 too.

Fake it til you make it, how else do you play Mafia?

In post 166, Egix96 wrote:

In post 99, redtea wrote:

In post 86, numberQ wrote:

In post 82, redtea wrote:I'm gonna unvote before this turns into a Thing
UNVOTE:

Considering no other things have happened or are happening, I say thing it up. Why is your vote better off the wagon than on it?

I'm trying to be a

little

more selective in my thinging

In post 100, redtea wrote:VOTE: gamma

that's me, being selective

Come on, that had to have been deliberate.

VOTE: redtea

In post 133, Enchant wrote:

In post 132, Roden wrote:

In post 130, Enchant wrote:

In post 128, Roden wrote:Also Enchant wtf are you doing

I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.

Ok, but why do you want a quick hammer? And why is Meg posting emojis enough to stop you from quick hammering?

Why not?

Idk, honestly. Seems like i turned in wimp with high empathy when i am sleepy. Mostly i really don't care.

Why i am not sleeping?

Weeeeeeell! I need to go now seems.

This is also terrible.

Side note: Roden is prob town for actually having common sense around the whole quickhammer situation, and also Azumarill to a lesser extent.

TMI that me and Roden are town?

Ughhhh...I'm gonna have to keep pushing discussion, aren't I?

In post 170, MegAzumarill wrote:

In post 166, Egix96 wrote:

In post 99, redtea wrote:

In post 86, numberQ wrote:

In post 82, redtea wrote:I'm gonna unvote before this turns into a Thing
UNVOTE:

Considering no other things have happened or are happening, I say thing it up. Why is your vote better off the wagon than on it?

I'm trying to be a

little

more selective in my thinging

In post 100, redtea wrote:VOTE: gamma

that's me, being selective

Come on, that had to have been deliberate.

VOTE: redtea

In post 133, Enchant wrote:

In post 132, Roden wrote:

In post 130, Enchant wrote:

In post 128, Roden wrote:Also Enchant wtf are you doing

I wanted quickhammer, but changed mind when noticed Mag was upset, and decided to hold for now.

Ok, but why do you want a quick hammer? And why is Meg posting emojis enough to stop you from quick hammering?

Why not?

Idk, honestly. Seems like i turned in wimp with high empathy when i am sleepy. Mostly i really don't care.

Why i am not sleeping?

Weeeeeeell! I need to go now seems.

This is also terrible.

Side note: Roden is prob town for actually having common sense around the whole quickhammer situation, and also Azumarill to a lesser extent.

TMI that me and Roden are town?

Somewhat agree with this. Shutting down early quick hammers is low effort town cred for scum, and doesn't even consider the possibility that Gamma could be my buddy and that I was trying to save him. That shouldn't really be seen as town indicative.

Egix, do you have a read on Gamma?

In post 97, mozamis wrote:ok, sorry, didnt realise game had started, catching up, ty

It's been a day, and not much has happened since this post. Are you caught up yet? Do you have any opinions?