In post 112, Korina wrote:ALSO, I DO WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOGIC OF ME CLAIMING MY ROLE RIGHT OFF THE BAT, WHY I'M THE BEST WAGON.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL PEOPLE BASED OFF OF "THIS ROLE IS FUNCTIONALLY USELESS" THEN YES, I'M THE BEST KILL.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL ME OFF OF *ANYTHING* ELSE, YOUR REASONS ARE BAD, AND I THINK THEY MAKE YOU SCUM
PEDIT: I WILL BE DRUNKLY POSTING TOMORROW DEPENDING ON HOW WORK GOES
Seems like a convenient pick you can't be entangled in contradictions with, and I'm not seeing a better wagon so far.
If that's their concern, why claim at all?
It could be to try and add plausibility to your claim.
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 6:19 pm
by House
In post 148, Korina wrote:AM I ALLOWED TO ASK FOR UNSOLICITIED ADVICE AS WELL ABOUT STUFF UNRELATED TO THE GAME
In post 112, Korina wrote:ALSO, I DO WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOGIC OF ME CLAIMING MY ROLE RIGHT OFF THE BAT, WHY I'M THE BEST WAGON.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL PEOPLE BASED OFF OF "THIS ROLE IS FUNCTIONALLY USELESS" THEN YES, I'M THE BEST KILL.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL ME OFF OF *ANYTHING* ELSE, YOUR REASONS ARE BAD, AND I THINK THEY MAKE YOU SCUM
PEDIT: I WILL BE DRUNKLY POSTING TOMORROW DEPENDING ON HOW WORK GOES
Seems like a convenient pick you can't be entangled in contradictions with, and I'm not seeing a better wagon so far.
If that's their concern, why claim at all?
It could be to try and add plausibility to your claim.
In post 148, Korina wrote:AM I ALLOWED TO ASK FOR UNSOLICITIED ADVICE AS WELL ABOUT STUFF UNRELATED TO THE GAME
No.
If you're asking, it's not unsolicited.
SAD
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 6:22 pm
by Korina
I DON'T KNOW WHAT ZOO IS DOING, BUT I DON'T THINK IT COMES FROM TOWN. I THINK IT COULD MAYBE COME FROM A JESTER?
DOES ANYONE KNOW IF JESTERS END THE GAME?
In post 112, Korina wrote:ALSO, I DO WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOGIC OF ME CLAIMING MY ROLE RIGHT OFF THE BAT, WHY I'M THE BEST WAGON.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL PEOPLE BASED OFF OF "THIS ROLE IS FUNCTIONALLY USELESS" THEN YES, I'M THE BEST KILL.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL ME OFF OF *ANYTHING* ELSE, YOUR REASONS ARE BAD, AND I THINK THEY MAKE YOU SCUM
PEDIT: I WILL BE DRUNKLY POSTING TOMORROW DEPENDING ON HOW WORK GOES
Seems like a convenient pick you can't be entangled in contradictions with, and I'm not seeing a better wagon so far.
If that's their concern, why claim at all?
It could be to try and add plausibility to your claim.
In post 112, Korina wrote:ALSO, I DO WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOGIC OF ME CLAIMING MY ROLE RIGHT OFF THE BAT, WHY I'M THE BEST WAGON.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL PEOPLE BASED OFF OF "THIS ROLE IS FUNCTIONALLY USELESS" THEN YES, I'M THE BEST KILL.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL ME OFF OF *ANYTHING* ELSE, YOUR REASONS ARE BAD, AND I THINK THEY MAKE YOU SCUM
PEDIT: I WILL BE DRUNKLY POSTING TOMORROW DEPENDING ON HOW WORK GOES
Seems like a convenient pick you can't be entangled in contradictions with, and I'm not seeing a better wagon so far.
If that's their concern, why claim at all?
It could be to try and add plausibility to your claim.
In post 112, Korina wrote:ALSO, I DO WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOGIC OF ME CLAIMING MY ROLE RIGHT OFF THE BAT, WHY I'M THE BEST WAGON.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL PEOPLE BASED OFF OF "THIS ROLE IS FUNCTIONALLY USELESS" THEN YES, I'M THE BEST KILL.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL ME OFF OF *ANYTHING* ELSE, YOUR REASONS ARE BAD, AND I THINK THEY MAKE YOU SCUM
PEDIT: I WILL BE DRUNKLY POSTING TOMORROW DEPENDING ON HOW WORK GOES
Seems like a convenient pick you can't be entangled in contradictions with, and I'm not seeing a better wagon so far.
If that's their concern, why claim at all?
It could be to try and add plausibility to your claim.
My claim?
Korina's.
Why does a post restriction need plausibility?
If you tell the same story from the beginning people will be inclined to think it checks out more, opposed to just claiming a role when you need to.
In post 112, Korina wrote:ALSO, I DO WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOGIC OF ME CLAIMING MY ROLE RIGHT OFF THE BAT, WHY I'M THE BEST WAGON.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL PEOPLE BASED OFF OF "THIS ROLE IS FUNCTIONALLY USELESS" THEN YES, I'M THE BEST KILL.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO KILL ME OFF OF *ANYTHING* ELSE, YOUR REASONS ARE BAD, AND I THINK THEY MAKE YOU SCUM
PEDIT: I WILL BE DRUNKLY POSTING TOMORROW DEPENDING ON HOW WORK GOES
Seems like a convenient pick you can't be entangled in contradictions with, and I'm not seeing a better wagon so far.
If that's their concern, why claim at all?
It could be to try and add plausibility to your claim.
My claim?
Korina's.
Why does a post restriction need plausibility?
If you tell the same story from the beginning people will be inclined to think it checks out more, opposed to just claiming a role when you need to.
Why can't scum have an all caps post restriction?
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 6:31 pm
by Zookeeper
In post 162, House wrote:
Why can't scum have an all caps post restriction?
I am playing Grand idea mafia the first time, I don't know all the answers.
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2022 6:33 pm
by Zookeeper
Meg
you've yet to answer why you assume my game to only start serious when I roll scum.
In post 162, House wrote:
Why can't scum have an all caps post restriction?
I am playing Grand idea mafia the first time, I don't know all the answers.
Me either. I have no clue whether scum can be post-restricted or not.
It wasn't a trap question.
THERE'S A FEW SCUM ROLES THAT HAVE A STIPULATION OF I MUST TALK IN ALL CAPS, BUT THE VAST MAJORITY OF THEM WE'VE ALREADY VERIFIED I CANNOT BE, DUE TO A VC.
MOST OF THE SCUM ONES WITH THAT POST RESTRICTION ARE DOUBLE-VOTERS. WE CAN SEE I'M NOT A DOUBLE VOTER.
THERE'S LIKE ONLY ONE SCUM ROLE THAT IS MAFIA ONE, BUT IT STATES YOU CAN NEGOTIATE WITH THE MOD OVER IT, BUT MOD GETS FINAL DECISION, AND AS FUNNY AS CAPS LOCK WOULD BE, I WOULDN'T NEGOTIATE FOR THAT.
THE ONLY OTHER CAPS LOCK SCUM ROLE IS TOAD (FROM MARIO) AND THAT WENT POORLY FOR ME WHEN I FAKECLAIMED IT
