Mafiascum.net

actually, cook confirmed they had 2 fasc 1 lib... said they gave me 1 fasc 1 lib, meaning a fasc got tossed, I'm saying I got 2 fasc, and would BET 1 lib got discarded

so there is for sure lib in the next pairing

In post 148, petapan wrote:cook just to be sure, you drew 2F 1L, yeah?

ye

In post 151, Andante wrote:so there is for sure lib in the next pairing

i agree there's a lib next

like, FOR SURE lib card gets played next

In post 143, Who wrote:Okay, now cook is confirmed fash to me.

this as a reaction is kinda lol though

cook, why even lie like that for me? just say you drew 3 fasc...

In post 150, Andante wrote:actually, cook confirmed they had 2 fasc 1 lib... said they gave me 1 fasc 1 lib, meaning a fasc got tossed, I'm saying I got 2 fasc, and would BET 1 lib got discarded

I'm leaning toward this yeah, and I'm freezing 3 - 5 - 7 until we get a shot.

shot doesn't confirm anything in 357... you realize that?

In post 149, Frogsterking wrote:Okay we can try freezing 5 out then and giving 2 another shot at the cards when 6 is pres. so the pairs would be 1 -4 and 2- 6 unless one of us plays a fasc.

i think that works for now, becomes obvious if cook is lying

like, say cook is lying about the 2-1, and it really was 3-0, increases the odds of lib cards next round. literally just pick anyone frog, yall better pass the lib card

Do you choose me because i am likeble or because it's plan

actually it would be terribly funny if it's both cook and who

In post 158, Andante wrote:shot doesn't confirm anything in 357... you realize that?

This is true, it could be that there are more than one fasc in 3 5 and 7, but it's a little unlikely

In post 163, Enchant wrote:Do you choose me because i am likeble or because it's plan

because if you and i are a pair and 6 and 2 are a pair we can keep passing lib without being forced to top deck as many times

Aren't it's mathematically bad for two fascist to enforce fascist and then bus each other?

uhhh it could likely be Who and Cook... Who hasn't been towny at all, so this is cook like "ha! this one for sure bad... makes me look more liberal"

In post 163, Enchant wrote:Do you choose me because i am likeble or because it's plan

you and i are the only ones who passed a liberal policy so far lol

framing me literally does nothing but make me sad... so idk why that happened, but like when it's my turn to be pres, can I please have a shot to prove myself?? like, I'm not bad!!!

Game State

table order

1. enchant
   
2. save the dragons
   
3. cook
   
4. frogsterking
   
5. who
   
6. petapan
   
7. andante

liberal policy tracker [1/5]: [#][ ][ ][ ][!]

fascist policy tracker [3/6]: [#][#][#][ ][ ][!]

exectutive actions with 7 players are

[

no power

][

investigate loyalty

][

call special election

][execution][execution+veto powers unlocked][fascists win]

election tracker [0/3]: [

*

][ ][ ][

!

]

cards in policy deck: 5

cards in policy deck when last shuffled:

6 liberal

and

11 fascist

deadline: xx:25

In post 165, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 158, Andante wrote:shot doesn't confirm anything in 357... you realize that?

This is true, it could be that there are more than one fasc in 3 5 and 7, but it's a little unlikely

Do you already know that cook is fasc? From your point of view, if cook is lib then andante and I are fasc. If cook is fasc then it becomes unlikely that either andante or I is fasc. From my point of view it's unlikely that there is more than one fasc in 357 because I know cook is fasc.

I recieved 2 fascist and i had no choice.