Mafiascum.net

I'll ja both presidents who didn't pick Skitter.

RC this sounds identical to me being "confirmed fascist" after not playing cards last game

In post 147, Andante wrote:how is skitter 100% confirmed fascist if she hasn't played cards yet?

He's fasc ...

In post 152, skitter30 wrote:

In post 147, Andante wrote:how is skitter 100% confirmed fascist if she hasn't played cards yet?

He's fasc ...

he did this exact same thing to me last game.. and he was fasc there

And with pooky too

conflict means both players r locked out of government

it reduces the playing field from 7 -> 5

there's no point for you to argue RC-fasc to us

Idk if RC-Fasc have any merit of just randomaccusing

In post 151, Andante wrote:RC this sounds identical to me being "confirmed fascist" after not playing cards last game

This is how SH works

When two people think each other are fascist you remove them both from play because conflicts drastically increase liberal winrate when they are correct

Me and skitter are big kids who can be trusted with our accusations, one of us is fascist one is liberal neither of us are touching the deck again

enchant we r literally not sorting between RC/Skitter because it's pointless to do it.

as long as they both are not in gov its fine

I mean i'm telling you i'm p confident he's fasc here

And i'm p sure he picked pooky in his govt because he's fasc too, the odds of rc getting 3f i'm p sure is mathematically unlikelu?

In post 156, Enchant wrote:Idk if RC-Fasc have any merit of just randomaccusing

Doesn't matter if I'm liberal you still have 80% winrate just following my conflict and I'll take those odds

Just play outside of me and skitter

Fiiiine

In post 140, Dwlee99 wrote:I think Andante is f. Is this a meta read on skitter RC?

what is your worldviw here, do you think me and andante are both F or what

peta is good. I Ja'd his government

In post 155, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:conflict means both players r locked out of government

it reduces the playing field from 7 -> 5

there's no point for you to argue RC-fasc to us

Ah ok. If rc is out too that's fine
Would wanf you to be out too thi ...

ok so skitter and peta L. got it

I can't be assed to defend myself when I'm guilty until proven innocent, conflicts is how SH works. Just play.

In post 163, petapan wrote:

In post 140, Dwlee99 wrote:I think Andante is f. Is this a meta read on skitter RC?

what is your worldviw here, do you think me and andante are both F or what

I think you're sus but it seems unlikely you're aligned if rc/skitter contains fasc

In post 165, skitter30 wrote:

In post 155, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:conflict means both players r locked out of government

it reduces the playing field from 7 -> 5

there's no point for you to argue RC-fasc to us

Ah ok. If rc is out too that's fine
Would wanf you to be out too thi ...

um you can't conflict 2 people lady

ftr whoever is lib who neined that is clownshoes

Damn choice is hard

I thought we were conflicting skitter?

Do fasc get to talk pregame?

Peta if you think that you and skitter are two libs build a bridge get over it and play outside of her and I