Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 3:17 pm
Alanna
talk to me about furtive please
talk to me about furtive please
We'll have to agree to disagree here. Discussing previous games is unproductive, IMO. Understanding players experience level is a different story and something that is helpful. No need to discuss how someone played previously as Mafia, or vanilla town, etc. though.In post 147, Somnus wrote:Hard hard disagree. Stuff like that (in the first two pages, no less when like 4 people out of 9 were here) helps sort people’s experience/play style. That’s the opposite of confusion. You scum-read me for it but gave the two players asking questions about previous games a null and/or townread for it.
Hey, Marci. Welcome.In post 152, marcistar wrote:Yes, I'm curious as well. Whats furtiveglances experience like?
I would think it can be helpful to identify patterns in a person’s playstyle. I don’t think it’s smart to base reads off only that but it can still be a factor.In post 153, BigTerp wrote:We'll have to agree to disagree here. Discussing previous games is unproductive, IMO. Understanding players experience level is a different story and something that is helpful. No need to discuss how someone played previously as Mafia, or vanilla town, etc. though.In post 147, Somnus wrote:Hard hard disagree. Stuff like that (in the first two pages, no less when like 4 people out of 9 were here) helps sort people’s experience/play style. That’s the opposite of confusion. You scum-read me for it but gave the two players asking questions about previous games a null and/or townread for it.
So TTTT and furtive get a scum-lean for asking me about my previous scum-game then, correct? And I'd get a town-read if I ignored their questions and told them it wasn't productive? Like...lol what even is this logic.In post 153, BigTerp wrote:We'll have to agree to disagree here. Discussing previous games is unproductive, IMO. Understanding players experience level is a different story and something that is helpful. No need to discuss how someone played previously as Mafia, or vanilla town, etc. though.In post 147, Somnus wrote:Hard hard disagree. Stuff like that (in the first two pages, no less when like 4 people out of 9 were here) helps sort people’s experience/play style. That’s the opposite of confusion. You scum-read me for it but gave the two players asking questions about previous games a null and/or townread for it.
Hi, thank you.In post 154, Somnus wrote:Hey, Marci. Welcome.In post 152, marcistar wrote:Yes, I'm curious as well. Whats furtiveglances experience like?
They are a newbie, we were both town in our last game and I was a loud voice towards killing them. Which is part of the reason I am hesitant to call them scummy for their posts so far :/In post 152, marcistar wrote:Yes, I'm curious as well. Whats furtiveglances experience like?
General impression is nullish-maybe-town. I will read into things more and give a more detailed post later, but my laptop just died and I don’t particularly want to scroll through their ISO on my phone.
In post 160, Lukewarm wrote:Marci, are you town?
In post 161, marcistar wrote:no, r u?
I'm guessing it has to do with the joking scum-claims? Curious where you're going with this.In post 158, marcistar wrote:Hi, thank you.In post 154, Somnus wrote:Hey, Marci. Welcome.In post 152, marcistar wrote:Yes, I'm curious as well. Whats furtiveglances experience like?
I'm still reading right now, and quoting things. But do you have any guesses why I asked specifically about furtiveglance?
Urge to scum read Furtive growingIn post 131, furtiveglance wrote:My biggest townread is Mr Turtle. They seem quite frank in a way that mafia might not be on day 1.
In post 140, Somnus wrote:Hoping to hear more from lukewarm, Mr Turtle, and Pimpest (as well as for marcistar to join) so I have a complete roster to make initial reads of.
It was something to get things moving for me early day one. It just seemed odd, as I'm not used to so much discussion about previous games, especially when it directly effects the current game. Maybe it's just that things have changed in that respect since I last played. But especially for a newbie game, I don't see how it's productive. And I certainly am not going to dig back through previous games to try and gain Intel.In post 156, Somnus wrote:So TTTT and furtive get a scum-lean for asking me about my previous scum-game then, correct? And I'd get a town-read if I ignored their questions and told them it wasn't productive? Like...lol what even is this logic.In post 153, BigTerp wrote:We'll have to agree to disagree here. Discussing previous games is unproductive, IMO. Understanding players experience level is a different story and something that is helpful. No need to discuss how someone played previously as Mafia, or vanilla town, etc. though.In post 147, Somnus wrote:Hard hard disagree. Stuff like that (in the first two pages, no less when like 4 people out of 9 were here) helps sort people’s experience/play style. That’s the opposite of confusion. You scum-read me for it but gave the two players asking questions about previous games a null and/or townread for it.
??In post 161, marcistar wrote:no, r u?
I agree with whatever Luke said about this post, I lost it but I agree with itIn post 49, Alianna wrote:I swear I’m town, just lacking braincells today.In post 45, TTTT wrote:Alianna
you seem like a fun person
I'm sorry you rolled scum in your first game
I hope you have an experienced partner to talk to so it's not overwhelming
I think the first few pages its fine to do this stuff since like, what better would we talk about at game start?In post 108, BigTerp wrote:Speaking of confusion, the first page or two had a lot of talk about a previous game or 2. Seems like a few of you were already in a game together, which is fine. But talk that like, again, is prime for causing confusion. Further cements my thoughts (scum lean) on Somnus and raises my eyebrow towards TTTT.
IDK if im dumb but this seems a bit eh.. like noncommital? Mostly just based on like 2 words in it though. But otherwise I think Somnus would be town.In post 139, Somnus wrote:Yeah. Like I’m cool with the vote on me, but the logic used behind it, as well as the immediate town-read on furtive (not a shot at furtive, btw) for the exact same thing is absurd. Not to mention thinking that furtive hard-claimed town cop less than 24 hours into the game after jokingly stating he was mafia role cop. Enough about power roles. This is a bad idea.
what about it
To be fair, I questioned if Furtive was claiming a special town role, not a scum role. Either way, again, it seems like play style in general has changed since I last played. I may have some catching up to do.In post 157, Lukewarm wrote:.
Also, I am catching what TTTT is putting down wrt to BigTerp's entrance.
He enters the thread with 1 town lean and 1 scum lean, and then before he can even articulate the town lean he is noticing that furtive is claiming a scum role, and is confused, but it also not halting posting his read before he understands what is happening.
Frankly it feels like he started with the read, and then opened the iso and was like "wait, what?" - but could not walk it back because he had already hit send on 101
------
I would move my vote, but I am contractually obligated to leave my RVS vote on Marci at least until she gets here and assures me she is town
That's fine if you choose not to dig through people's ISOs from previous games.In post 167, BigTerp wrote:In post 140, Somnus wrote:Hoping to hear more from lukewarm, Mr Turtle, and Pimpest (as well as for marcistar to join) so I have a complete roster to make initial reads of.It was something to get things moving for me early day one. It just seemed odd, as I'm not used to so much discussion about previous games, especially when it directly effects the current game. Maybe it's just that things have changed in that respect since I last played. But especially for a newbie game, I don't see how it's productive. And I certainly am not going to dig back through previous games to try and gain Intel.In post 156, Somnus wrote:So TTTT and furtive get a scum-lean for asking me about my previous scum-game then, correct? And I'd get a town-read if I ignored their questions and told them it wasn't productive? Like...lol what even is this logic.In post 153, BigTerp wrote:We'll have to agree to disagree here. Discussing previous games is unproductive, IMO. Understanding players experience level is a different story and something that is helpful. No need to discuss how someone played previously as Mafia, or vanilla town, etc. though.In post 147, Somnus wrote:Hard hard disagree. Stuff like that (in the first two pages, no less when like 4 people out of 9 were here) helps sort people’s experience/play style. That’s the opposite of confusion. You scum-read me for it but gave the two players asking questions about previous games a null and/or townread for it.
You were directly asked if you were town. Your response was "no, r u?" Please explain.
Fair enough. Just not now I'm familiar with playing.In post 172, Somnus wrote:]
That's fine if you choose not to dig through people's ISOs from previous games.
You know what else gets things moving early in Day 1? Discussing people's experience/play-style.