in a not so surprising note, I don't really like him that much.
Didn't really like his soft defense of me in VOTE: 48 and I think his thought that there could be 3 scum is laughable. Would be funny if he was scum that slipped that his team was 3 wich means there'd be a traitor and guy true claimed his traitor role.
scum!nero thinks everything is amusing. And yet more shade.
...ain't it.
So yeah you are SCUM!! You die today!
I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of and I am by no means going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum and just throw off a miselim as "oh guess I was wrong this time".
If this is serious, make a case on them based on the current game as people who do not know nero that much can actually add onto the case, refute some points etc. Actual team style deduction, ya know?
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
Maybe months, if not nearly a year ago. I had a decent time off of the site, nor do I remember how many people play except those that I talk with on a regular basis and even then I try not to meta-read as it's almost useless to say, nobody is going to follow a read that they also cannot follow and meta is an easy way to just cherry pick information.
It's a terrible route to go down.
In post 115, NashedPotato wrote:Maybe as a supplementary case but definitely not anywhere near primary.
I know town!Nero And all this right here...ain't it.
So yeah you are SCUM!! You die today!
I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of and I am by no means going to put trust into someone that could very well be scum and just throw off a miselim as "oh guess I was wrong this time".
If this is serious, make a case on them based on the current game as people who do not know nero that much can actually add onto the case, refute some points etc. Actual team style deduction, ya know?
In post 112, NashedPotato wrote:I'm not following a meta-read of someone I am unaware the meta of
you've played with me like 3 or 4 times or was this about VD? Also you seem like you are scum reading me in 108, no?
Maybe months, if not nearly a year ago. I had a decent time off of the site, nor do I remember how many people play except those that I talk with on a regular basis and even then I try not to meta-read as it's almost useless to say, nobody is going to follow a read that they also cannot follow and meta is an easy way to just cherry pick information.
It's a terrible route to go down.
In post 115, NashedPotato wrote:Maybe as a supplementary case but definitely not anywhere near primary.
pretty sure this is untrue. I mean true, I don't yell I'm town ad nausem but the idea that I don't call myself town as town is ludicrous and I don't think you actually believe this.
I feel like accusing someone of "shade" has prob lost its meaning these days. I and others are accused of "shade" all the time when it's just scumhunting. In this particular case, it was more of a cheeky comment b/c the how many scum are in a particular setup is or should be pretty easy to discern. Now over90 might actually be new and not an alt so I don't hold it against him but hamma's 3 in a 16 is
no, I am not. What makes you think the leading poster is being lazy? "zzzzzzzz" is something I post when I think things are boring. For someone that claims to know me, it sure is odd that you didn't know that.
it was a semi-serious RVS page 4 wagon with 2 votes on you and STD was making a big deal over it.
Honestly, this feels like a lazy OMGUS case where you just when through my ISO and put down "scumNero does this, scumNero does that."
I don't care about OMGUS, I think you're scum. Even though there hasn't been much of anything in this game so far, I feel town!you would've done more by now.
and sort of a backtrack? Your case on me was meta and it's been proven wrong and no one besides Kitty is following it and now your case is that I haven't done enough. Where was that reasoning earlier?
In post 140, RCEnigma wrote:The post only exists to paint Nero in a worse light with no elaboration or catalyst. Dare I say I think that's shade?
But yeah it comes off like "hey I think Nero is shady....so if anyone wants to wagon that for me, that'd be great."
Except it's not great.
The catalyst was Italiano's case.
Not Known 15 wrote:
In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:Balance here would be offsetting a severely outnumbered mafia by giving them a ton of power. But I doubt it's 13:3.
BS.VOTE: KittyTacky
So 13:3 isn't tilted in town's favor? I don't understand what's BS here. Kinda sketchy NGL.
Nero Cain wrote:
In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:Do you really expect me to try to case you on page 6? I don't case people this early.
no, but you said that you didn't think that this was similar to my town game and you could use words to back that statement up. Odc you can just say you were sheeping VD.
In post 139, KittyTacky wrote:The cardinal sin of waiting for more posts from a player before seeing whether to commit to a read or not.
you are being hesitant. It's also early game and I'm nowhere near elimination range...the whole "I need to see whether to commit" sounds like a fence sit.
1. Yeah I was sheeping Italiano for the most part. I'll admit it. Though I also get a different vibe from your play this game. It's hard to explain.
2. What's wrong with just being somewhat cautious this early?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 3:37 am
by ItalianoVD
In post 157, Nero Cain wrote:and sort of a backtrack? Your case on me was meta and it's been proven wrong and no one besides Kitty is following it and now your case is that I haven't done enough. Where was that reasoning earlier?
Probably by your partner RC.
They quoted one thing "town!nero doesn't want to kill half the thread" and threw out the rest of what I posted. Uh uh
In post 46, SirCakez wrote:Seems like Nero is pre apologizing for being scum
Seems like Nero was trying to read the room, not give a raodmap of his own activity
This is sketchy.
Feels like you are defending him instead of letting him defend himself.
This timing feels a bit off, why only bring this up after Nero already did so?
As for why I posted that, it’s because I read Nero’s post a certain way and it seemed Cakez read it a different way, one that felt less natural. As such, I stated what I thought the natural interpretation was.
i am a deserter of the war everybody forgot about
but that war is not over for me, because i still have my rifle and some strong principles
during all those years i was killing many people and nobody cares about them, bc they deserved every single bullet
i started to kill only those who deserve it more than anybody else
really bad people, pure evil
and std is among them, he deserves my bullet
i feel it through the scope
with no sound from a long range distance
it is enough to have at least one eye to understand: is a person bad or not
In post 46, SirCakez wrote:Seems like Nero is pre apologizing for being scum
Seems like Nero was trying to read the room, not give a raodmap of his own activity
This is sketchy.
Feels like you are defending him instead of letting him defend himself.
This timing feels a bit off, why only bring this up after Nero already did so?
As for why I posted that, it’s because I read Nero’s post a certain way and it seemed Cakez read it a different way, one that felt less natural. As such, I stated what I thought the natural interpretation was.
I haven't posted since this happened.
I mean I could just not catch up or post commentary if you would like me to do that instead?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 5:43 am
by Gamma Emerald
why was your only comment to bring up something someone else mentioned?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 5:48 am
by mq.bosco
I'm still here. ^^
Good news - u'r active.
Bad news - I have to read all this pages...
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 5:50 am
by Not Known 15
In post 160, KittyTacky wrote:So 13:3 isn't tilted in town's favor? I don't understand what's BS here. Kinda sketchy NGL.
Correct. 13:3 Mountainous isn't tilted in town's favor. It's scumsided.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 5:54 am
by over90
townies for me rn: kitty, bosco, nero, potato
mistakes are possible, but i don't want to elim em today
i tried to sort the rest ones, but it is too hard for now
