Mafiascum.net

Yeah gamma is scummy.

porkens, were you fully caught up when you made 134?

No

In post 149, Porkens wrote:4. You did downplay your own read - we can agree on that. I think that’s scummy because it’s a good setup for having your read proved wrong. I can see scum motivation there. What would the town motivation be?

i didn't "downplay" anything and if you think that i did you quite simply aren't reading anything that i'm saying. i try to be clear about the strength or relative lack thereof when it comes to my reads at all times – if you think that it's more likely that i'm "setting myself up to have a read proven wrong" when nk15 has literally only made one single post than that i'm just being clear about exactly what i think, i'm not really sure what to say. being clear about the lack of strength of a read isn't "downplaying".

Ok well agree to disagree I think that’s the definition of downplaying.

if you have a read that isn't very strong and you make that clear, what would you call that?

Downplaying

okay, i guess we just have a different understanding of that word. to me saying something is "downplaying" has a pretty intrinsic negative connotation of something being bad and you attempting to make it look less bad, when i guess you don't think that's the case.

i have a scum read on porkens

it is medium strong

In post 157, Porkens wrote:Downplaying

i'd probably say uncertain rather than downplay. the latter implies actively working to de-emphasize rather than simply being transparent about where you stand

In post 132, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 131, Dannflor wrote:like I feel you're overly worried about the seriousness of a page 5 wagon on you

Well this is at leat A reason, and he is more occupied defending himself from this than trying to be helpful

Plus i didn't like the "do the work for me" in the tiene

VOTE: gamma emerald


By the way i'm usually more inclined to lynch more quiet people day 1 so I'm okay with Yume nk15 or not_mafia too at this point, might change my mind tho

These 3 have anything to say about gamma or scrrrrrrdbear?

In the tone*

In post 161, JunkoChan wrote:By the way i'm usually more inclined to lynch more quiet people day 1 so I'm okay with Yume nk15 or not_mafia too at this point, might change my mind tho

FYI since you've been gone awhile...

In post 0, mith wrote:For many years, the word “lynch” was used to describe the person who was voted out by town in a mafia game. We no longer allow this word to be used.

In post 160, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 157, Porkens wrote:Downplaying

i'd probably say uncertain rather than downplay. the latter implies actively working to de-emphasize rather than simply being transparent about where you stand

Yes, exactly, that’s what NSG is doing, I think.

hey junko just a heads up site culture has moved towards using words like "eliminate" or "yeet"

there's a rule against using "lynch"

I know it's just habit and you won't get like banned for forgetting once or twice but just a heads up

In post 164, Porkens wrote:

In post 160, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 157, Porkens wrote:Downplaying

i'd probably say uncertain rather than downplay. the latter implies actively working to de-emphasize rather than simply being transparent about where you stand

Yes, exactly, that’s what NSG is doing, I think.

oh - then i just disagree with you

Junko do you any reads

In post 159, Dannflor wrote:i have a scum read on porkens

it is medium strong

Please explain.

Penguin: ok sounds good.

have

do you have any reads

In post 163, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 161, JunkoChan wrote:By the way i'm usually more inclined to lynch more quiet people day 1 so I'm okay with Yume nk15 or not_mafia too at this point, might change my mind tho

FYI since you've been gone awhile...

In post 0, mith wrote:For many years, the word “lynch” was used to describe the person who was voted out by town in a mafia game. We no longer allow this word to be used.

Oh i didn't knew about it, thanks for the heads up

I think drilling down on this one point about semantics is distracting from the first three points to which NSG has not responded. Those are the meat of the argument.

In post 169, Dannflor wrote:have

do you have any reads

I do but they would require a long post to explain and writing in my phone is not confortable at all

If You want a list without context i can do that

why the fuck do I even bother playing this game?

That’s a pretty towny post.