Page 61 of 61
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:24 am
by T S O
I would honestly prefer a "No-one wins" verdict, but if someone had to, scum do deserve it more, replacements or not.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:32 am
by Save The Dragons
Well that was a wacky game.
Thanks for modding, BB
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:35 am
by KingdomAces
I'd be fine with a verdict of Bert and Spades winning. Bert managed to get ika lynched upon his replace in, and his follow was a huge swing in town's favor netting both BBMolla and STD while confirming Who as town. And as I've said in the dead thread, if I wasn't confirmed not jester, I would have been pushing a Spades lynch quite a bit.
Really though, maybe it would just be better if we all just forgot this game ever happened.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:40 am
by Honey bee
I tried :( Everyone kept calling me scummy and nothing I said seem to convince anyone otherwise.
I thought my plan was foolproof..
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:44 am
by Not_Mafia
It was literally autowin for town. I even asked Bob to surrender after Elmo's flip.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:47 am
by KingdomAces
Honey bee, you were fairly obvtown. I have no clue why anyone thought otherwise. Also the plan was foolproof.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:01 am
by reinoe
Oh yeah, still not my worst game...
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:02 am
by Bicephalous Bob
↑ Not_Mafia wrote:It was literally autowin for town. I even asked Bob to surrender after Elmo's flip.
You are lucky you didn't ask me directly but gave me the option to do it.
↑ ika wrote:pedit: imo i say this is a town win, to me it deosnt feel like a true win due to the fact that:
A) the final scum was replaced twice
This was a big disadvantage to scum, in my opinion. NM wasn't able to read up before making his Night 2 kill. That and BBm's crazy gambit that involved him no-killing Night 2 left way too much room for PoE.
I agree with the sentiment that being scum is really boring if everyone reads you as town, though.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:20 am
by theaceofspades
for once i'm pretty glad that a lot of people wanted to kill me.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:18 am
by reinoe
↑ Honey bee wrote:Thank you for modding bob.
Reinoe you don't have anyone to blame but yourself. Elmo made mistakes but this game was solved and you could at least care enough to read and understand what's going on. If you don't care fine but don't blame others for how you played.
Meh. Playing like shit doesn't mean I didn't care.
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2014 8:20 pm
by BBmolla
yo
you guys can suck my dick
thanks
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 1:54 pm
by reinoe
reinoe wrote:Bicephalous Bob wrote:Thanks for replacing, sorry for the delay. Your role PM:
You are a Town Innocent Scumhunter. You are publicly confirmed to have this role at the start of day 1. You win if you fulfill one of the following conditions:
-You're still alive when all threats to the town are eliminated.
-You submit a correct set of players on the same night you're nightkilled. If you're nightkilled, it doesn't matter to you if the town wins. However, the less non-town players are alive, the easier it is to submit a correct set.
Every night, you may submit a set of players, sized the total number of players minus the number of players needed to lynch someone. You win if you, on the night you're killed, submit a set containing all anti-town players or if your entire set consists of anti-town players. You lose by default if you're lynched or endgamed or if you fail to submit a set on the night you're killed.
The game will continue after you reach your non-standard win condition. No one but you will be told if you won the game.
PM me your role name to confirm.
BTW, I have surmised that based on my win conditions my best strategy is to provide as little information as possible. I am making my own internal notes for my set creation in the event hat I get night-killed. It is going to appear that I am lurking to the max/trolling but it is the best strategy based on my role.
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 4:48 pm
by Equinox
Mine?