Mafiascum.net

Also...I retract my tr on LoX.

They're all over the place...plus their shtick (along with a few others) is annoying.

In post 1500, havingfitz wrote:

Also...I retract my tr on LoX.

They're all over the place...plus their shtick (along with a few others) is annoying.

Then vote LoX.

In post 1483, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I agree with Vifam and

kinda LoX

maybe actyually

Then vote LoX

In post 1495, XnadrojX wrote:

I'm also not liking LoX,

both heads has strange posts to their name. My suspicion of this slot is also leading to less suspicion than normal on the James3 slot.

Then vote LoX

P.S if I'm calling you out with my posts here it's because you're expressing your SR/non-TR of LoX and instead SHEEPING other wagons. You might as well help the rolecop push one of the scummiest players to the noose than just lynching a random town just to "lynch" because that's VERY non-townie to do and I will FOS anyone who hangs the other two wagons when they flip town.

Also Tywin, know what I think? Get your arse back on LoX and stop complaining. Because we're gonna look at those who refused to vote the hydra tomorrow if they continue to express doubt about the hydra and refuse to help town lynch a person who most likely IS scum over sheeping some wagon.

You want old school? Then let's get rid of the heads and work our way down the bloody chain until people start making real cases for their votes rather than sheeping random people over a claimed rolecop.

In post 1501, CommKnight wrote:Then vote LoX.

I prefer where my votes at. And the wagon has more support atm.

Do you sr RC or Vifam?

In post 1505, havingfitz wrote:

In post 1501, CommKnight wrote:Then vote LoX.

I prefer where my votes at. And the wagon has more support atm.

Do you sr RC or Vifam?

No I do not and neither should you. I don't care who has more support. In a game this size there could be 4 mafia all "supporting" your wagon.

Plant your vote on LoX and help add to the support of it, because helping push a scum wagon on town will do you no favours.

In post 1499, havingfitz wrote:

In post 1495, XnadrojX wrote:It appears that Vifam is the main wagon ATM and LoX is the main counterwagon.

No...Vifam and RC are both L-4. No one else is even close atm. Your vote is parked on a non factor. Vote RC and help make the game a better place.

why RC is better lynch?

When Vifam flips scum can we powerlynch Fitz?

In post 1506, CommKnight wrote:No I do not and neither should you.

Fair if you don't. ATM I disagree... I might at some point consider LoX over a NL and after a closer look. TBD

Didn't LoX claim something? iirc....

I will vote LoX if the alternative is a NL but we finally have a wagon that I like so I'd rather stick with this.

In post 1509, havingfitz wrote:

In post 1506, CommKnight wrote:No I do not and neither should you.

Fair if you don't. ATM I disagree... I might at some point consider LoX over a NL and after a closer look. TBD

Didn't LoX claim something? iirc....

they claimed investigative role

In post 1493, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:TTTT you must join us in lynching the Vifam

only if you can explain why you changed your mind about lynching RC
when all he did was self-vote and play hang-man

Also, if you think LoX is scum, their approach to the Vifam wagon means you should think that there's a fairly strong chance for them to be partners.

Guy who doesn't like to bus hops on a wagon because their claimed top townread asked them to then immediately finds somewhere else to vote to try to push a wagon near the end of a day.

Like I think that there's a town explanation regardless of flips but if you think Grey hydra is scum then Vifam should be a very appealing wagon to you.

In post 1511, Ramcius wrote:they claimed investigative role

Where? All I see is the claim they'll give a town result to whoever investigates them. Aka....they're claiming town.

TTTTT have you considered that the towniest thing a man could possibly do is selfvote and play hangman?

Imo if a man selfvotes and plays hangman that person should be permanently written off the lynchpool and considered confirmed town and I'm not sure why anyone disagrees here.

In post 1515, RadiantCowbells wrote:TTTT have you considered that the towniest thing a man could possibly do is selfvote and play hangman?

"A man"?
sure.

"RC"?
not really.

I have a question. Do you think that Scum!RC in this situation would have any difficulty finding someone besides myself to vote for and pushing a case on them?
'cause there's a point where you have to realize that anything, everything that I do is deliberate. Was the hangman a calculated way to get pressure off? yes. it worked.
But then again I could have done literally anything there and there are so many better ways to get pressure off as scum because doing what I did relinquishes control over the game.
I like controlling the game as scum because I direct the lynches and lead the flow of the game. Playing hangman and trolling does not garner you control of the game.
No, if I were scum I would have replaced in with a strong case on someone that I would have thought up before seeing role PM because I specifically wanted to play town.
Go in fast and hard with a really powerful case on literally anyone in the game, *probably* someone that has never been wagoned up to that point, get them lynched, continue game.
Is that self meta and thus unreliable? Yes, and I even lie about self meta constantly as both alignments. But I'm still town and at some point town needs to trust me so I'll do what I can to enable that.
If you're saying you don't trust the hangman because I'm RC: what exactly IS it that you would trust me to be town for doing, mister?

In post 1333, Land of Xanth wrote:Who all has Ramcius tried to lynch today?

Fuzzy
Pep
Skelda
LoX

Who all has Ramcius named as scum suspects that he didn't vote?.

Comm
Vifam
Zekro

Fished for a wagon for TTTT 735

Gems like 1069 abound in his ISO.

Ramcius isn't trying to game solve. All he has cared about all day is finding a lynch that wasn't him.

His white knighting of Pep was unnecessary posturing, because nobody was actually going to lynch a VLA slot.

Investigative claims aren't lynched d1, right?

We are an investigative role, so stop digging around

on our wagon and lynch Ramcius.

bolded their claim

In post 1517, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have a question. Do you think that Scum!RC in this situation would have any difficulty finding someone besides myself to vote for and pushing a case on them?
'cause there's a point where you have to realize that anything, everything that I do is deliberate. Was the hangman a calculated way to get pressure off? yes. it worked.
But then again I could have done literally anything there and there are so many better ways to get pressure off as scum because doing what I did relinquishes control over the game.
I like controlling the game as scum because I direct the lynches and lead the flow of the game. Playing hangman and trolling does not garner you control of the game.
No, if I were scum I would have replaced in with a strong case on someone that I would have thought up before seeing role PM because I specifically wanted to play town.
Go in fast and hard with a really powerful case on literally anyone in the game, *probably* someone that has never been wagoned up to that point, get them lynched, continue game.
Is that self meta and thus unreliable? Yes, and I even lie about self meta constantly as both alignments. But I'm still town and at some point town needs to trust me so I'll do what I can to enable that.
If you're saying you don't trust the hangman because I'm RC: what exactly IS it that you would trust me to be town for doing, mister?

@___@

I just @_______@

Not the right response from someone who claims to think that I am obvious scum and is currently voting me.

I never said you were obvious scum I just want this to end

You literally just gave a whole self meta speech like please someone end this day

Were both at L4 someone get together and end one of us