Mafiascum.net

In post 1499, Brigitte wrote:I think Ank is arguing that from a scum philosophy pov that getting a lynch on top scumread isn't the biggest priority for scum rather than not getting lynched themselves?

In post 1494, xRECKONERx wrote:my vote is staying parked on brigitte like until she's dead k bye

In post 1500, xRECKONERx wrote:i dont know what the hell you're talking about with the second one. im not sure what game you're reading because that isn't at all what happened

ank asked me my thoughts on brig's case against ank
i gave my thoughts
brig ignored it and said i wasnt reading
i tried to engage brig multiple times about her opinion, every time she just said i wasnt reading and ignored me and refused to engage

it's a specific discrediting play. i'm not the one who started this shit with brigitte, she flipped around and started ignoring/discrediting me the SECOND i dared disagree with her case on ank
she's free to try to engage me but she has shown me absolutely nothing to make it worth my effort to continue trying to engage her since there's zero good faith there

my vote stays

In post 1502, Enter wrote:

In post 1494, xRECKONERx wrote:my vote is staying parked on brigitte like until she's dead k bye

"I refuse to engage with a player unless she is already prematurely frustrated and emotional, and making further attempts later on is out of the question. I will now sit on her wagon until she is dead. Do not bother engaging with me further."

In post 1504, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 1502, Enter wrote:

In post 1494, xRECKONERx wrote:my vote is staying parked on brigitte like until she's dead k bye

"I refuse to engage with a player unless she is already prematurely frustrated and emotional, and making further attempts later on is out of the question. I will now sit on her wagon until she is dead. Do not bother engaging with me further."

excuse me?

literally what fucking game are you reading jesus goddamn christ

at what point was brigitte emotional? was she frustrated/emotional all because i disagreed with her case on ank? bc if so, maybe mafia's not the game for her. and if not, then she had EVERY opportunity not to discredit me

you're putting the entire burden on me and giving brigitte a pass

what the fuck

In post 1498, Enter wrote:

In post 1496, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1487, Enter wrote:How is pushing mislynches on people who want you dead NOT playing towards scum agenda?

Only if my goal is to get this entire 1v1 written off as a TvT deathtunnel, in which case I'd be more than happy to embrace it and use it to derail the entire game away from focusing on either of us.

Having someone who scumreads me but has no credibility left isn't a threat, and that's a relatively easy way to get people to not want to focus on my slot anymore for the foreseeable future, and there's enough potential here to drag this out ad infinitum without the debate actually going anywhere.

The only real threats are if people get fed up and decide to lynch both of us anyway, which wastes a lot of town's time that they can use actually getting information from lynches, or if the lynch gets sidelined into a buddy of mine that is just coasting by otherwise.

I'm not seeing much disadvantage with this plan?

You see a disadvantage to the plan of pushing a mislynch on a player that's scumreading you?

What is Occam's Razor?

In post 1505, Enter wrote:@post 1488

Ank. Are you telling me that your posting style (and the posting style of the players around you) never changes based on mood, rl circumstances, game circumstances, and a million other factors that you cannot account for? Is this really your reason for scumreading Brig? Are you saying you never talk to different people with different levels of hostility depending on how they had been treating you?
That case is a joke. I've seen entire play styles change from players being lurky, controlled, and quiet to interactive and pushy between games, not to mention that Brig already proved she could flip a switch earlier in the game when she went from fluffposting to realposting in RVS (and multiple other times throughout the game, iirc)

In post 1510, Ankamius wrote:Yes, I become accountable for not dying later in the game and for having to either keep up the town leader persona or to find a way to 'apathy out' of that role.

This way I don't have to do any of that lol

In post 1508, Enter wrote:Ank acted like a manipulative conniving person last night. I don't know about you but I have never come out of engagements with manipulative people happy and ready to discuss with whoever is around what's going on in the world.

In post 1513, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1508, Enter wrote:Ank acted like a manipulative conniving person last night. I don't know about you but I have never come out of engagements with manipulative people happy and ready to discuss with whoever is around what's going on in the world.

think what you want

In post 1512, Enter wrote:

In post 1510, Ankamius wrote:Yes, I become accountable for not dying later in the game and for having to either keep up the town leader persona or to find a way to 'apathy out' of that role.

This way I don't have to do any of that lol

P sure this is nightless as of RN, and "not dying" is a pretty silly excuse to lynch a town member.

No deadlines mafia we kept Nancy alive even though she was strong town because she was pocketed by the entire scum team.

In post 1514, Enter wrote:

In post 1513, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1508, Enter wrote:Ank acted like a manipulative conniving person last night. I don't know about you but I have never come out of engagements with manipulative people happy and ready to discuss with whoever is around what's going on in the world.

think what you want

Are you telling me you went into that engagement NOT wanting to push a Brigitte lynch?

In post 1516, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1514, Enter wrote:

In post 1513, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1508, Enter wrote:Ank acted like a manipulative conniving person last night. I don't know about you but I have never come out of engagements with manipulative people happy and ready to discuss with whoever is around what's going on in the world.

think what you want

Are you telling me you went into that engagement NOT wanting to push a Brigitte lynch?

I'm saying I don't really want to discuss it anymore, I'm pretty certain it's going to go just as nowhere as it has so far.

In post 1518, Enter wrote:

In post 1516, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1514, Enter wrote:

In post 1513, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1508, Enter wrote:Ank acted like a manipulative conniving person last night. I don't know about you but I have never come out of engagements with manipulative people happy and ready to discuss with whoever is around what's going on in the world.

think what you want

Are you telling me you went into that engagement NOT wanting to push a Brigitte lynch?

I'm saying I don't really want to discuss it anymore, I'm pretty certain it's going to go just as nowhere as it has so far.

Please, your answer will help me read you, and then I'll go do something else, clear my head, and come back to the game thread with your answer in mind.

Did you intend on getting Brigitte lynched when you initially engaged her last night?

In post 1520, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1518, Enter wrote:

In post 1516, Ankamius wrote:

In post 1514, Enter wrote:Please, your answer will help me read you, and then I'll go do something else, clear my head, and come back to the game thread with your answer in mind.

Did you intend on getting Brigitte lynched when you initially engaged her last night?

yes

In post 1519, Enter wrote:Also me, now, I guess.

In post 1522, Brigitte wrote:

In post 1519, Enter wrote:Also me, now, I guess.

scum slip

In post 1519, Enter wrote:If I offended you by saying you played like a manipulative, conniving person, I apologize. That was kinda mean. If it means anything to you, most of my friends are manipulative, conniving people too. Also me, now, I guess.