Page 61 of 86
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:45 pm
by skitter30
i mean, really?
you pretty clearly did not really scumread me there
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:46 pm
by chennisden
In post 1454, chennisden wrote: In post 1452, pisskop wrote:Chen, what are your 'raisins' for believing my claim? Thats a hard defense youve picked up and dropped and repeated.
Not gonna dilly dally anymore.
I am a PR
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:47 pm
by chennisden
In post 1493, chennisden wrote:The turnaround is because you pushed the "obv" pr
My iso might have some doubting of you from earlier and I'll look
Might have some
doubting
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:47 pm
by chennisden
Like really skitter
Macho alone is not a pr
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:47 pm
by skitter30
In post 1498, chennisden wrote: In post 1495, skitter30 wrote:being informed isn't something that i woudlnt' lynch day1 ... it's not in the same league as a doc, not even remotely
like i thought you were informed; informed isn't a role that would inherently make me not lynch someone day1, so i pushed it
i don't understand the problem you're having
like are you really trying to say that it's problematic to push informed or macho or something similar day1 ?
I NEVER claimed only macho.
i didn't say you did, i'm explaining what it looked liek from my pov - obviously i don't know what role you are, so i was working with what i had
from *my* pov you were p obviously informed so that's what i was assessing things on. from that pov how is my push scummy ...
calling me scummy for pushing a pr that i didn't know existed is ridiculous
pedit and yeah i thought that 'pr' meant informed
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:48 pm
by skitter30
that's a colloquial semantic difference ffs
people call miller a pr too
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:49 pm
by chennisden
I feel like you're twisting things to fit an agenda, no?
I feel like cinnamon was right. He's competent and I traditionally am not esp with replace ins
Also dann has given the same thoughts.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:49 pm
by skitter30
like is the basis of your read literally that i pushed a pr claim ...
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:50 pm
by chennisden
If I was lone macho I'd be like "hey guys I'm macho" with no mention of a pr
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:50 pm
by skitter30
In post 1506, chennisden wrote:I feel like you're twisting things to fit an agenda, no?
I feel like cinnamon was right. He's competent and I traditionally am not esp with replace ins
Also dann has given the same thoughts.
uh, no, show me exactly what where i'm doing that. like pull up a quote and show me where i'm twisting things or misrepping you
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:51 pm
by chennisden
People have been giving you some doubt early on giving me some more confidence.
Your response to my push is also something that feels bad
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:51 pm
by skitter30
for like the sixth time i thought when you were saying 'i'm a pr' you were saying that you were informed
and in the context of telling people not to push pisskop, the 'i'm a pr' is p obviously that you have some sort of information that would lead you to believe a doc claim is real (ie being macho in this case) - like why would i think a pr claim meant something else in that context
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:52 pm
by chennisden
Strawman. I told you that I was looking for places where I might have expressed some level of doubt, not previous scumreads.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:53 pm
by skitter30
In post 1510, chennisden wrote:
People have been giving you some doubt early on giving me some more confidence.
Your response to my push is also something that feels bad
this is awful, no offense
this boils down to:
a) you don't like that i pushed a pr claim (that in context looked like bieng informed that a doc exists - and this is bad to push because ...)
b) some other people doubted me so you should too (even though you defended me against them before!)
c) my push feels bad and i'm allegedly misrepping you and twisting things but you can't or won't show me where
d) you're pushing me for doing things you yourself did
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:55 pm
by skitter30
In post 1477, chennisden wrote:Everyone I've interacted with has been somewhat townie from my pov but you
I was gonna sort you tomorrow but we don't have the time or the means
Your 180 on me also can have the same said for it
i mean to me this means that you don't think i've been playing townie - in the context of the posts you pulled out you were largely saying you townread me - you pulled out 2 posts that expressed doubt amongst 15 others that showed you were townie
if you think my play has been scummy recently don't pull out posts to show that you doubted a townread on me from 700 posts ago
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:55 pm
by chennisden
In post 1020, chennisden wrote:IF YOU ARE A POWER ROLE -- ANY POWER ROLE -- DO NOT COUNTERCLAIM. WAGON PISSKOP.
Does this not heavily imply that another pr existing is not possible? Your push implies that you haven't been actually reading and that's something scum can afford to do
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:56 pm
by skitter30
like everything you're saying is baseless accusations and conclusions and you don't have any logic to actually back them up
like you're just respondign in the immediate to whatever i say but none of it holistically makes sense with each other
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:56 pm
by chennisden
Skitter30 a majority of your questions can be answered in a 30 second iso skim
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:56 pm
by skitter30
In post 1515, chennisden wrote: In post 1020, chennisden wrote:IF YOU ARE A POWER ROLE -- ANY POWER ROLE -- DO NOT COUNTERCLAIM. WAGON PISSKOP.
Does this not heavily imply that another pr existing is not possible? Your push implies that you haven't been actually reading and that's something scum can afford to do
why the fuck based off of that would i assume that another strong pr was you
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:57 pm
by skitter30
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:58 pm
by chennisden
I have to go so my last comment will be that your basis for pushing me was fundamentally flawed and if you actually wanted to sort me you should've looked deeper at my crumbs
And if you're town please admit this so we can work together
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:58 pm
by chennisden
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 2:59 pm
by skitter30
no, you really really really haven't
i'm going to keep bringing up that you're accusing me of misrepping you and twisting your words but can't show me where
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 3:00 pm
by chennisden
In post 1518, skitter30 wrote: In post 1515, chennisden wrote: In post 1020, chennisden wrote:IF YOU ARE A POWER ROLE -- ANY POWER ROLE -- DO NOT COUNTERCLAIM. WAGON PISSKOP.
Does this not heavily imply that another pr existing is not possible? Your push implies that you haven't been actually reading and that's something scum can afford to do
why the fuck based off of that would i assume that another strong pr was you
Because 2 PRs is normal and 3 is not
I'm asking you to see NOW that your basis for scumread is terrible. Would've been better before but you know what they say. The second best time is now
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 3:00 pm
by chennisden