Mafiascum.net

then shouldn't you be voting someone you think is scum?

... You think you're doing a day 1 lynch on a serial killer in a 50 player game?

At the time tictac pushed she was at 4 votes. "Self-preservation"? And how is going aggro at a charismatic player "self-preservation"

I lead a day one lynch on a serial killer before in a 50 player game.

I am going to re-check some stuff before giving my opinion on whether or not it's an sk slot, it was just a random thought that popped in my head in retrospect of their actions thus far. Or at least the ones I've read.

i feel bad for whoever is the 1 tbh. hope you do well. like lol you must have some insane role powers to be in a 49 v 1

In post 666, tictac wrote:i'd unvote the energy-guy, but I don't buy the claim. at all.
pedit: lol

this, more often than not, is a wolf claim.

In post 725, tictac wrote:

In post 716, insomnia wrote:

In post 714, tictac wrote:

In post 705, insomnia wrote:why are you shading chem for it?

chem recently co-modded a game w wake in it is why.

ok what does that tell w/r/t chemist's alignment?

chem was like *lynch Hec cause no contrib on day is bad* which is disingenuous if chem sees hec-post as memeing.
also *shrugs*

Checkmate.

curses on yer house

Here's my analysis that will be done once per 3 weeks because it involves me thinking which I don't have the energy for.

Tictac, until this post, didn't have way too much shit on anyone. He mentioned names here and there without a reason, and his current vote was policy lynch which turned into "I'm not voting, claim's fake".

In the mind of a town, let's see what that entails...Policy lynching means you don't have any information and can change your opinion on the slot fairly easily. A loud BG claim should, even if remotely, cause a reaction here that tictac's lacking. There was no click in his brain. When you policy someone, you'd at least want to read their posts and whenever new information is provided, you don't just shut it down and push through.

In the mind of a town...If you were in tictac's shoes, not knowing anyone's alignment, would you have called someone scum for fake claiming EVEN THOUGH it's an easily confirmable role as well as important? You could just verify it during the night. What even made you think the claim is fake? Because you haven't made any comments about him. My point is, if you have no particular lean towards a slot, this kind of thing should almost make you doubt yourself immediately, what kind of town says "I think it's fake"

Next, he shaded Chemist for it, then implied that was not a shade, but he still didn't think Chemist was a suspect. You're joking me? Half your posts in isolation up to this point have been you focusing on players and asking them whether they were scum for not believing Hectic was doing a Wake impersonation, and when you find someone that could straight up lie about it, you choose to shade them instead of figuring their alignment out? You're honestly sitting on a policy lynch and someone (fypov) is not better of a vote / chase??????

===================

I saw the explanation for why he thinks it's faked and it's reasonable. Point about Chemist still stands.

If you're gonna spend your time chasing ghost leads on people for not knowing wake and when you find someone that knows him and could opportunistically vote and you go :

In post 1205, tictac wrote:Also never claimed i was trying to 'figure him out', so nyah at insomnia.

After you said this :

In post 714, tictac wrote:

In post 705, insomnia wrote:why are you shading chem for it?

chem recently co-modded a game w wake in it is why.

In post 725, tictac wrote:

In post 716, insomnia wrote:

In post 714, tictac wrote:

In post 705, insomnia wrote:why are you shading chem for it?

chem recently co-modded a game w wake in it is why.

ok what does that tell w/r/t chemist's alignment?

chem was like *lynch Hec cause no contrib on day is bad* which is disingenuous if chem sees hec-post as memeing.
also *shrugs*

Checkmate.

curses on yer house

In order to try and pinpoint why you made the comment in the first place to make it look like it had a purpose of discerning one's alignment, although previously you said there was no reason / nothing to gain based off it.

Then you can eat lead.

In post 1427, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1424, profii wrote:Is neros push on making you lol

...?
His push on you, you mean?

The way he is pushing you reminds me of that game I just randomly pushed you, although you wer scum there ha ha

In post 1503, EeveeLution Army wrote:i feel bad for whoever is the 1 tbh. hope you do well. like lol you must have some insane role powers to be in a 49 v 1

That Serial Killer will literally win every 2020 Scummie if it happens, lol.

In post 1445, Titus wrote:

In post 1444, Nero Cain wrote:Day 1 is the best day for scumhunting. Today is the best day for flailing about. Telling me and town to pick betwwn BR and Tic Tac with a week and a half left is massively bad.

I think you're assuming this is forever. Wrong. The wagons get going. Highlight profili obvscumming in the middle (assuming he is). His reactions tell you about the alignments of the other two. If we pushed up both wagons and profili legit didn't care, you could use that. If both show themselves town, then push profili.

But screaming profili scum is likely to get you ignored and bitched at.

Work with us.

You can push up aliterally any wagon and I'll not really care.

50p... day 1... it's like a 1% chance that someone will come up with an actual good reason so I think I'm just going to sheep the top wagon for the rest of day 1 to help start the lynches

I dont even care if you lynch me. I kinda signed up because 50p seemed like a hard thing to achieve... now having participated I feel invested enough to sit and watch from the dead thread but if I survive a while then whatever

Ita great that Nero is trying to be scum hunter extraordinaire but I am not going to effort this game. I'm too busy

I think tic tac is top so....

VOTE: tictac

(12): insomnia, Rhinox, Black Ranger, Titus, AaronFrost, Amrun, Not Known 15, gobbledygook, NorwegianboyEE, Almost50, Elsa Jay, profii
(9): Jackal711, Cat Scratch Fever, Hectic, Uncrowned, Yiley, VaultDweller, Dolly Parton, tictac, Nero Cain
(2): Drixx, Psyche
(2): Pink Ball, Kirari Momobami
(1): bob3141
(1): DrDolittle
(1): Egix96
(1): The Fonz
(1): Garmr

(20): NotAJumbleOfNumbers, clidd, UltimatePlank, SausasaurusRex, Non Imh, davesaz, dsjstr, Chemist1422, Pine, Something_Smart, eth0s, EeveeLution Army, pisskop, QuantumQuasar, Jamelia, Golden Robster, BBMolla, ar98mubarik, hersho, Emperor FlippyNips

With 50 alive, it takes 26 to lynch.

: (expired on 2020-03-22 10:04:00)

In post 1507, profii wrote:I am not going to effort this game. I'm too busy

kool story bro. you mind if I target you tonight?

In post 1505, profii wrote:

In post 1427, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1424, profii wrote:Is neros push on making you lol

...?
His push on you, you mean?

The way he is pushing you reminds me of that game I just randomly pushed you, although you wer scum there ha ha

Pushing me? I haven’t got that impression at all. Looks more to me like he’s been pushing you.

Just because I don't know what else to do.

Keep on keepin' on!

UNVOTE:


Since my vote doesn’t mean shit anyways

In post 1458, The Fonz wrote:He should probs explain why he felt the need to vote Titus when already voting her.

1. 'Titus' was easy to type.
2. It became clear to me that my reasoning to not believe the claim in the first place was not as trivially commonsense as I had originally thought, and needed to be spelled out. I wanted people to read the reasoning and a post with a vote in it has more visibility than one without.

In post 1516, Emperor flippyNips wrote:UNVOTE:


Since my vote doesn’t mean shit anyways

Hmm if you unvote while not voting anyone, does that mean you're now voting everyone?

In post 1407, Black Ranger wrote:

Tictac

Just to confirm, your read on chemist is a serious one? Can you explain it?

yes. push on Hectic for reasonig that I believe to be fake. (the Wake thing, which I believe Chem would recognize having co modded a game in which wakes day1 behaviour was a point of contention).

Also, do you have history (the negative kind, not meta) with A50?

i mean those two things are the same.
A50 has extensive meta as lying town, which makes him my preferred policy. I mentioned the fact as a joke, cause I don't actually believe such a policy is in any way achievable here.

In post 1504, insomnia wrote:You're honestly sitting on a policy lynch and someone STRAIGHT UP LYING (fypov) is not better of a vote / chase??????

u know who else is lying?
Titus is.

In post 1487, Wake1 wrote:

Those players that have not posted in-game yet have been prodded, and I am giving them 24 hours after the prod to post. After that I will be actively looking to replace them unless they notify me of their intention to remain in the game and be active.

In post 1485, Pink Ball wrote:VOTE: clidd

In post 1486, Kirari Momobami wrote:I was actually going to guess that too

VOTE: clidd

Game state summary ?

Nevermind, 61 pages.

I'll take a look at the last 10 ~ 20 eventually.

There's a inertia pile on me, a few folks figured u were scummiest of the lurkers and Black Ranger being the first to mention scum-neighbors in a neighborhood is apparently scummy.