Page 61 of 92
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:30 pm
by Bell
I meant both from a "starts with higher corruption than others" and "Dies at a different corruption level than 3"
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:30 pm
by BananaCucho
And an investigative role that self harms with corruption (even if it is a higher threshold) choosing to hammer there like that at the end with that many hours left? I don't buy that either
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:31 pm
by Bell
Shh Banana.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:32 pm
by BananaCucho
-_-
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:33 pm
by Bell
Porkens, what is your current corruption level and did your corruption change overnight?
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:33 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
Sounds like crap from Porkens. And that he targeted Redtea who ALREADY confirmed targeting no-one is very convenient.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:37 pm
by BananaCucho
In post 1505, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Sounds like crap from Porkens. And that he targeted Redtea who ALREADY confirmed targeting no-one is very convenient.
I want Porkens to explain following Redtea before I dig my teeth in there
Who's left? Starbuck, am I missing someone else?
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:38 pm
by NorwegianboyEE
Catboi too i think
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:38 pm
by Bell
Catboi
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 12:38 pm
by BananaCucho
Ah yeah Catboi
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:33 pm
by catboi
(*｀Ω´*) Hot take: Porkens is telling the truth about his role, it's just not town aligned. Track on redtea doesn't make sense from a town POV aligning with his opinions from the previous day but does make sense from a scum rolecop POV.
（=´∇｀=）I think it's not implausible for there to be duplicate versions of roles in the game, and found the way redtea claimed to be fairly believable.
( ^..^)ﾉ I claim vanilla town.
~(=^┬ ┬^) The claims are confirming my fear, which is that the second kill assuredly did not come from town. Given this perspective, I'm actually much more skeptical of androbee's claim now than before. Giving someone corruption immunity seems implausibly strong. I think it needs to be resolved today because otherwise on later days they'll have the excuse that suiciding would cause town to lose. I think one of those two should be the vote today.
VOTE: androgybee
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:34 pm
by catboi
In post 1486, Dumb and Dumber wrote:I'm not really sure how, or where, I'm holding up or derailing this wagon. I made it p clear we'd switch to porkens if necessary, but that Star was our first choice.
- Dumber
Why this preference, exactly? I don't get it.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:36 pm
by BananaCucho
Thanks catboi, I agree 100%
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:52 pm
by Bell
Stealing wrote:
Cleric
- Norwee (Decrease corruption by 1)
Cleric
- redtea (Decrease corruption by 1)
Priest of Corruption
- Bell (increase corruption by 1 with loud modifier)
E.H.
- Banana (Self-harm 1 corruption to increase day time by 24 hours, Can't place votes at 0 corruption.)
[Unknown name]
androgybee (Self-destructing purification role thing...?)
Jackel -
VT
Dumb & Dumber-
VT
Porkens-
Beast master
(self-harm, 1 corruption increase to target another player, sacrifice pet and lose target ability to survive if corruption is 3 or greater)
Catboi-
VT
(
KIA
) NDMath -
VT
(
KIA
) S_S -
Saintess
(Mod confirmed role, Jack of all trades)
(
KIA
) Joey_ -
VT
Not claimed:
- starbuck
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:59 pm
by Bell
Is it better for town to get rid of the third party or the mafia in this scenario?
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:02 pm
by BananaCucho
In post 1514, Bell wrote:Is it better for town to get rid of the third party or the mafia in this scenario?
Good question. We kill mafia theres a chance of crosskill, but tbh 2 kpn is just so much. We can't afford another 2 dead town
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:06 pm
by redtea
Weird that Beastmaster has the same investigative ability as Saintess, Sancta Something.
A maf-tracker role does make sense if we have so many people who can remove corruption.
Is sndrogybee the theorized third party here
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:09 pm
by Bell
Maybe.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:09 pm
by Bell
Any clue why Porkens would track you red tea? He had you at null in the wee days of day 1. But TR you at the end of it.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:10 pm
by Bell
No reason of course. Sigh.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:10 pm
by catboi
With the claims I'd really bet against any possibility of crosskill. We can get scum or 3p today and either is fine but we have to get the 3p by day 3 (assuming it is a 3p and not some weird multiball situation).
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 4:03 pm
by Starbuck
I really am the worst these past few weeks. Sorry, friends. Anyways...
androgy has been at the top and NEE, but I've been trusting my town reads on him and trying not to take his abrasiveness as overconfident scum.
I really need to take a deep dive at Porkens because I've played with him as scum before (the Temporal Lich Grand Idea) and as town (Mafia of Revelations) and I've been struggling to get a read on him. Hence, my near silence in regards to him.
In post 1299, catboi wrote:Might be my preconceived bias speaking but starbuck's post on androbee looked like "casing for the sake of a case".
How so? I've had issues with their slot since the start.
To be fair, and it's something I've been tossing around in my head for a few days, I don't think a Banana 3P is as unplausible as Banana and NEE are trying to make folks believe with how quickly they discredited Jackal after this vote. I'm not sure what Jackal's thinking, but I think Banana is getting the near confirmed town treatment due to being a stump on Day 1 and I'm not sure if that was the best way to go about it.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 4:07 pm
by Starbuck
As for me, I'm a Cursed Townie. I gain 1 point of Corruption if I'm not on the elimination wagon at EOD.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 4:18 pm
by catboi
Treatment of Banana has less to do with him being a stump and more the way he's played where I feel like he's been actively trying to scumhunt and been pretty strong + his attitude today doesn't come off as scummy. If it's lategame I'd maybe re-evaluate but otherwise see no reason to.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2020 4:24 pm
by Starbuck
In post 1523, catboi wrote:Treatment of Banana has less to do with him being a stump and more the way he's played where I feel like he's been actively trying to scumhunt and been pretty strong + his attitude today doesn't come off as scummy. If it's lategame I'd maybe re-evaluate but otherwise see no reason to.
At the same time, though, have you look at the Activity Overview? The colossal amount of posts and quite a bit of fluff can also be scum indicative.