Mafiascum.net

In post 1317, jon_h61 wrote:I'll have to reread Jordan, I don't feel like voting either Aegor or Zayzec at this time. If I could, I'd be voting Rach right now. It's gut, but it says she's scum this time. You know that kind of a read that has alarms going off in your head. This is Rach as scum.

Not really liking Mastin half of Necro, mostly (but not all) for his reasoning for his push on Talah.

Not sure I like TSO, at least something he was pushing earlier, I was disagreeing with.

As long as Thor doesn't go off the farm, he'll be Town, and I'll give his reads a little more credence.

@ Jordan Give me a synopsis on why you shouldn't be Today's lynch?
Wow, too many people. Let's get the lynches underway.

Could you make some (more, I guess) of this into something concrete please?

In post 1363, Xayzeck wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dry-fit

Can't be scum with a claim like that methinks

Xayzy is probably scum telling us that Jordan is town.

In post 1367, RachMarie wrote:Dry fits' responses to the claim by Jordan, however reeks of scumminess.

hmmmm?

Why in God's name are Xayzek and TSO arguing about Jordan being clear.
This just looks like BS started by Xayzek.

In post 1443, Titus wrote:I've been reading backwards

Have you ever done this before?

In post 1529, Zdenek wrote:

In post 1443, Titus wrote:I've been reading backwards

Have you ever done this before?

Frequently. I read the ISOs of the major wagons, ask for the cases (to determine social groupings) and fill in the rest as needed.

I'd also look at known VCA but we don't have thst.

@Thor, your thoughts are the prevailing thoughts. I don't care to lynch unless we can nail someone to their position.

In post 1530, Titus wrote:

In post 1529, Zdenek wrote:

In post 1443, Titus wrote:I've been reading backwards

Have you ever done this before?

Frequently. I read the ISOs of the major wagons, ask for the cases (to determine social groupings) and fill in the rest as needed.

Can I see an example?

In post 1488, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:VOTE: Mala

I feel completely ignored

Hey! Me too.

Why did you think I was mad?

In post 1514, PeregrineV wrote:Not feeling the Aegor or Dry-fit hate at the moment. No love either, so will lynch to avoid wasted day, but let's try a flashwagon on a replacement.

Vote: Jon_h61

This fence is so far up your ass I can see it coming out your mouth. I amnot surprised you were "convinced" to vote me.

In post 1532, Zdenek wrote:

In post 1530, Titus wrote:

In post 1529, Zdenek wrote:

In post 1443, Titus wrote:I've been reading backwards

Have you ever done this before?

Frequently. I read the ISOs of the major wagons, ask for the cases (to determine social groupings) and fill in the rest as needed.

Can I see an example?

Look at about half the larges I sub into in my ISO. I don't advertise but I ask for cases early on. That's a tip I am reading backwards. If I ask ppl to say what's important, I am reading forwards after lookng at ISOs.

Can't you just tell me the name of one?
Why are you being difficult?

In post 1504, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1441, Malakittens wrote:Step 1: read role PM.
Thought 1: Wonderful a multiball game. Kill me now.

Thought 1: Why would anyone think it's multiball?

Vote: Malakittens

This is pathetic. Voting someone solely for a deduction.

In post 1536, Zdenek wrote:Can't you just tell me the name of one?
Why are you being difficult?

It's not something I remember or take notes on and I have actual scumhunting to do. Why does it matter how I catch up?

In post 1512, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1506, Malakittens wrote:Okay, I'll stop being coy. The line after my name of my role the last word is pluriazed, which makes it very, very likely multiball.

Looks like boiler-plate text to me.

Dry-fit, do you disagree?

In post 1515, The Necromancers wrote:

In post 1514, PeregrineV wrote:Not feeling the Aegor or Dry-fit hate at the moment. No love either, so will lynch to avoid wasted day, but let's try a flashwagon on a replacement.

Vote: Jon_h61

vote titus with me?

or, get some more people and i'll vote jon with you

Come help!

In post 1517, jon_h61 wrote:Since it's pretty straightforward, it should be easily explained so everyone will understand. Please enlighten everyone as to how you know I received a scum PM.

I hacked your account.

In post 1488, Shiny Hydreigon wrote:VOTE: Mala

I feel completely ignored

This can die too.

In post 1538, Titus wrote:Why does it matter how I catch up?

Reading backwards sounds ineffectual, so I wonder why anyone would do it, and you've done it more than once, so I'm curious to see if it worked well for you.

In post 1502, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1401, Thor665 wrote:You: Pere, I don't understand ______________. It seems to me _________________.
Me: Ah. Let me tell you why....

Pere, I don't understand why, after reading up on the game, your vote remained unmoved...and then, after this point, went to Mala off derp reaction test (at best), then snaked around to Titus, and then to a last minute (and exceedingly weak) jon wagon attempt with a promise to help with a hammer, so your vote, basically, is flopping around like a carp with you wanting to have me discuss your thoughts while your vote isn't manful enough to stand still and be examined for half a second which means none of your thoughts are either. It seems to me that you are either scum or a wuss.

Please fill in your blank now?

In post 1531, Titus wrote:@Thor, your thoughts are the prevailing thoughts. I don't care to lynch unless we can nail someone to their position.

My thought prevails because it is easily more supportable than your thought, and indeed, your thought is a weird microcosm of my thought.

I will happily lynch someone I cannot nail to their position - that is a silly standard because, functionally, it means you'd nver lynch a lurker...which is not a good strategy.

In post 1502, PeregrineV wrote:You: Pere, I don't understand ______________. It seems to me _________________.
Me: Ah. Let me tell you why....

Pere, I don't understand why, after reading up on the game, your vote remained unmoved...and then, after this point, went to Mala off derp reaction test (at best), then snaked around to Titus, and then to a last minute (and exceedingly weak) jon wagon attempt with a promise to help with a hammer, so your vote, basically, is flopping around like a carp with you wanting to have me discuss your thoughts while your vote isn't manful enough to stand still and be examined for half a second which means none of your thoughts are either. It seems to me that you are either scum or a wuss.

Please fill in your blank now?

In post 1531, Titus wrote:@Thor, your thoughts are the prevailing thoughts. I don't care to lynch unless we can nail someone to their position.

My thought prevails because it is easily more supportable than your thought, and indeed, your thought is a weird microcosm of my thought.

I will happily lynch someone I cannot nail to their position - that is a silly standard because, functionally, it means you'd nver lynch a lurker...which is not a good strategy.

Thor, I think you misunderstand. I want to hold ppl accountable for their votes rather than lols deadline.

Zdenek, it works as a stopgap until I can do a fullread (provided I live)

I'd still love it if you linked a game.

In post 1528, Zdenek wrote:Why in God's name are Xayzek and TSO arguing about Jordan being clear.
This just looks like BS started by Xayzek.

exactly.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go

For Zdnek now if you'll excuse me