Page 62 of 79

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 12:38 pm
by Mathdino
eyestott wrote:One thing, though.
Matdino: I'm im your strongest townread, how did you forget me specifically in that post?

You were so town that I forgot to say you should be town.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:22 pm
by eyestott
Mathdino wrote:
eyestott wrote:One thing, though.
Matdino: I'm im your strongest townread, how did you forget me specifically in that post?

You were so town that I forgot to say you should be town.

Huh, ok.

Now, if Prohawks claim was real, do people believe he was right in saying it was detrimental information?

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:31 pm
by Mathdino
Nah, he's enough of a suspect for mafia to forego killing him even if we no-lynch.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:55 pm
by mastin2
I SWEAR I WILL GIVE YOU CONTENT SOONER OR LATER!

ProHawk - 1 (pirate mollie)
Nazarene - 1 (guille2015)
EddieFenix - 1 (Nazarene)
guille2015 - 1 (EddieFenix)
Mathdino - 1 (ProHawk)

Not Voting - 4 (ika, eyestott, Mathdino, DrippingGoofBall)

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.


<<< Just an FYI, everyone, but you ARE one week from deadline. >>>

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:58 pm
by Mathdino
VOTE: mollie

just to make the votecount "111111". And cuz nothing else to do.

Nazarene get in here.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 1:58 pm
by Mathdino
Mastin I request a 2nd votecount directly below this post just to satisfy my sense of votecount perfection.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:08 pm
by mastin2
Sure!

ProHawk - 1 (pirate mollie)
Nazarene - 1 (guille2015)
EddieFenix - 1 (Nazarene)
guille2015 - 1 (EddieFenix)
Mathdino - 1 (ProHawk)
pirate mollie - 1 (Mathdino)

Not Voting - 3 (ika, eyestott, DrippingGoofBall)

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:44 pm
by eyestott
VOTE: DGB
This is just to make it even more one-derful.
But still, piratemollie and DGB, are your roles investigation related?

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:46 pm
by eyestott
Actually, no. UNVOTE: DGB. I'm not gonna waste my vote. I'm gonna take a close look now, and vote for my scumread.

<<< Well, I suppose that voting pattern was a...
:cool:
One
-night stand. >>>

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:52 pm
by Mathdino
^I approve of both of these posts.

eyestott, care to answer yesterpage's questions?

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:54 pm
by eyestott
Yep.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:55 pm
by eyestott
Wait, where are your ika questions?

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:57 pm
by eyestott
Nevermind, I found them.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:13 pm
by ika
Mathdino wrote:I'd like to know which claims you believe and which you're iffy on.

Would also like to know your reads list completely disregarding roles and night actions.

Also want to know your thoughts on mollie, DGB, and eyestott, since that group of players is my blindspot at the moment.


im largly tired so its semi-steam of consis/semi off top head thoughts

claims hesitant on:

tracker
JK
1-shot mill
super cop (the claim itself not the fact that hawk is most likly a pr)

mollie: still town
DBG: alone, is losing the town i once had on here but someone has seems to be saying otherwise
eyesott: if this is the one shot miller claim (i dunno who it isat this poitn) they they are one of my suspects and havent sen mcuh

im going to just fuck up vc further

VOTE: DGB

mod do another VC we need more 111111111111


<<< Sorry, I was square dancing at the time. >>>

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:16 pm
by eyestott
Ika, why are you hesitant on the four claims, mine in particular?

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:17 pm
by eyestott
In fact, you've just said you don't believe all but one of the claims.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:20 pm
by Mathdino
lol ika

not sure whether to feel special

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:26 pm
by eyestott
Nazarene: out of all of the claims, I'd probably be the least inclined to believe him. If a watcher came forward, maybe. But think of this: we haven't really had much in the way of common investigatives. We have a claimed ultimate cop, we have a gunsmith, a sane cop (confirmed sane, unlike other investigatives), but trackers are common, and insane trackers are very easy to fake. From what I understand, the only info naz gets is whether his target targeted someone, by reversing it. Not only that, but Prohawk has disputed his N2 result. Finally, out of all of the claimed investigatives, Naz' is the least useful, IMO. Mislynching Prohawk and killing ultimate cop would be much worse than mislynching an insane tracker.


Guille: The only thing that makes me think he might possibly be telling the truth about his claim is that shos flipped as a doctor. Unless something blocked guille or unblocked Eddie, one of them must be lying.
1: guille is blocked. This would mean that there is another blocker, obviously.
2: Eddie is either ascetic, or strong willed, or something else.
3: Eddie was deblocked by someone.
4: guille is lying about JKing Eddie.
5: Eddie is lying about being RBed.
I doubt that a deblocker exists. Eddie, is there anything to suggest that you are strong willed? 4 and 5 can only be ruled out by lynching one of them. We can find out if 1 is true by finding another roleblocker, or if two people are RBed during the night.
Risk assessment wise, if one of them is scum, it would be better to lynch guille first. Eddie says he has an investigative power, and JK messes up with investigations too much. Either way,
Eddie: why aren't you claiming? Is it for the same reason Prohawk was hesitant to claim?
There still a week left in this day, but there's 12 hours left in another of my games, so urgency calls.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:35 pm
by EddieFenix
I'm not claiming because I'm not trying to get RB'd or have my role get dicked with if I can prevent it (tl;dr, i'm fuckin stubborn). Also, WHY in gods name would I lie about finding out Sonic Boom was scum night 1? There's nothing in my role that says I am strong willed. So, why don't we lynch the JK claim, I can dig for info on the person I have in mind for night 3 (IF I don't die that is), and then we go from there?

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:40 pm
by Mathdino
That's actually a really good point about Nazarene. Insane tracker doesn't seem like it has much point in the first place. Am STILL at a loss as to why Naz didn't just ask ProHawk if he targeted anyone last night rather than asking for fullclaim. Will vote them after they come back and defend (and also after mastin gives another VC).

How bout the reads list question?

Edit: Okay, so that removes istott's possibility 2. It doesn't make sense for Fenix to claim they investigated someone even after being roleblocked even if he were a scum ascetic. Would be easier to just go with the JK claim.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:47 pm
by ika
im too tired, but the simpilest reason why those 4 claims dont make sense right now is relaying into the fact that everyone has conflicting results.....

tldr: occam razor

im also getting board with the gamestate so im going to resort to ika mode where the first person that goes to l-1 i just hammer just to give the gaem some spice and momentum and maybe back into the game

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:48 pm
by ika
night

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:50 pm
by EddieFenix
ika wrote:
im also getting board with the gamestate so im going to resort to ika mode where the first person that goes to l-1 i just hammer just to give the gaem some spice and momentum and maybe back into the game


That's bad town play tbh. Cause that could cause mislynches if we run up the wrong person.

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 3:56 pm
by eyestott
That's just stupid, ika. Who are my results conflicting with?

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2014 4:57 pm
by ProHawk
ika can't solve the game because its freaking unbalanced, whodathunk?

Also, Dino is still scum.

These votes are garbage, and town as a collective whole is playing like garbage. What happened to general mafia strat? Why aren't we colluding to lynch someone?