In post 1519, Dwlee99 wrote:Sonia, maybe no one is listening to you because you still think I'm scum and you're completely ignoring my on fleek reads?
We both know this isn't true and you just want to get a word in edge wise i'm not dealing with you rn
Well when you completely refuse to interact with someone and discuss their reads against yours you can't expect anything more than people just telling you you are wrong.
I haven't refused to interact with anyone I just said I won't take your reads into account because I think you're scum I don't think that's wrong to do
You think I'm scum so you won't even talk to me about my reads at all? You don't think there is even a slight chance you might be wrong?
Of course I could be wrong I could be 0/3 for all I know but I've had a really bad history of doubting myself when I would of been right so I don't want to doubt myself here.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:27 am
by Dwlee99
So you won't even LOOK at my posts?
Really?
-sigh-
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:27 am
by Dwlee99
In mafia you always have to take into account new information. Refusing to do so is silly.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:30 am
by xSoniaNevermindx
I'm talking with you rn am I not?
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:33 am
by Dwlee99
Not about my reads though. I made a whole case on texcat and instead of engaging with me on it you just say you're ignoring my reads.
Even transcend acknowledged my posts (although he said it wasn't a case which ??)
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:36 am
by xSoniaNevermindx
I already said Tex is a fine vote if I can't get any of the 3 I wanted lynch.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 11:46 am
by Dwlee99
whatever lol
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 12:43 pm
by texcat
In post 1526, Dwlee99 wrote:So you won't even LOOK at my posts?
Really?
-sigh-
In post 1527, Dwlee99 wrote:In mafia you always have to take into account new information. Refusing to do so is silly.
And you won't even LOOK at other candidates for lynch. Really?
In post 1526, Dwlee99 wrote:So you won't even LOOK at my posts?
Really?
-sigh-
In post 1527, Dwlee99 wrote:In mafia you always have to take into account new information. Refusing to do so is silly.
And you won't even LOOK at other candidates for lynch. Really?
This is such an awful post.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:08 pm
by texcat
What exactly is awful about it? I'm pointing out what a hypocrite Dwee is. He's asking Sonia to consider other posts/positions when he refuses to do so himself. Calling it awful is a scum move.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:18 pm
by BlackStar
In post 1534, texcat wrote:What exactly is awful about it? I'm pointing out what a hypocrite Dwee is. He's asking Sonia to consider other posts/positions when he refuses to do so himself. Calling it awful is a scum move.
I'm not going to pretend that I know his thoughts, but its not like he's said that he's not willing to lynch anyone else. If you strongly believe someone is scum of course you're gonna push for their lynch. That's normal. What Sonia was sayinf was that she thinks Dw is scum so she isn't going to pay attention to his reads at all. Those are two different things. You rushing to point out the "hypocrisy" felt like a desperate scum attempt to cast doubt. And then you did it again when I called your post awful.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:46 pm
by texcat
Spoiler: Dwlee tunnel
In post 1327, Dwlee99 wrote:p sure I already said why, blackstar, but whatevs
I want texcat lynched today.
In post 1366, Dwlee99 wrote:can we please just lynch texcat like I've been asking
Do you have any idea who Dwlee might be scum reading besides me?
You say it's natural to push hard for your chosen scum and I agree, but getting stuck in a tunnel and not considering others is bad. And you, like Dwee, seem to think that it's a good thing to listen to scum about who to lynch. Sonia thinks Dwee is scum.
Why would she listen to him or follow his lead?
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:50 pm
by BlackStar
She doesn't need to follow someone she scumreads. Just point out why his reads are bad/untrustworthy and maybe analyze what he says to figure out who his scum partners are. Sonia has been saying that she's just going to completely disregard his reads. For all she knows he might say something that will change her mind about him, but she's just ignoring him completely
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:53 pm
by Dwlee99
^^^
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 1:57 pm
by Dwlee99
In post 1536, texcat wrote:Do you have any idea who Dwlee might be scum reading besides me?
In post 1222, Dwlee99 wrote:Lowell
BlackStar
TierShift
algebra
gerryoat
Mimikyu
texcat
Saru VOTE: Blackstar
This has since changed, ofc, but here was my PoE just a couple days ago.
In post 740, texcat wrote:I'll never keep up with this level of activity. I hope things calm down after day one.
UNVOTE: Sonia
I've seen a lot of {a} is scum. Why? Because they're scummy. Not a lot of legitimate cases. But it's early.
I don't think that Saru's contradiction is much of a case. I didn't like his initial reaction to being wagoned, when he said he liked his own wagon (393). But his later posts have been slightly better.
Transcend made some valid points about Xkyfu agreeing with every lynch going, but looking back at X's iso, it doesn't really look like he started out agreeing with everyone.
I'd consider voting Zyf just so that it would be easier to keep up.
VOTE: Tiershift
for his 143 where he talked about his scum buddies bussing him.
Talks about reasons to scum read Saru
Talks about reasons to scum read Xkyfu
Talks about reasons to scum read zyf (my slot)
votes tiershift for bad reasons
Nvm about tiershift actually, probably Saru and Texcat.
Pls lynch???
pedit HAHA OK
In post 1471, Saru wrote:After my last game(the one that Dwlee modded), it'd be silly for me to say that town having too much power is out of the question. I also suck at setup spec, so I'm not even going to try. I don't understand why Transcend claimed so early, like seriously, you had like 3 votes on you or something. That's just dumb as fuck.
Anyways, I really don't like the case on Texcat. It seems forced. From my count, Transcend and Texcat both have 4 votes on them, so some resemblance of a team is forming on both sides. I'm going to look back at the VCs and read some other stuff before I decide who to vote.