Sure. I even agreed with you about that at the time.In post 1522, Flubbernugget wrote:I could score points here about you asking in some bullSmurf roundabout manner that was as weak as a 13y old trying to figure out if someone has a crush on themIn post 1518, Thor665 wrote:I asked you to back it up
But I'm not going to
In post 1514, Thor665 wrote:And I never presented anything untrue about Flubb. He's even half admitted it himself. He made up meta on me.
The only issue is whether you think that was a valid reason for me to scumread him or not.
You did present untruths on me.
I scumread that.
I scumread that quite a lot.
Especially when paired with empty attacks.
yeaqh good call, i'm not gonna read Thor anymore, guy is town but not interested in sensible debate.In post 1523, Flubbernugget wrote:This is wrong of me.
I shouldn't have said anything. I know better.
I'll have moz and Thor on shutoff now, sorry.
why not EP? At least Beefster IS VOTING and doing stuff.In post 1527, texcat wrote:VOTE: Beefster
I didn't like hislynch me--I'll sacrifice myself for town's sakedefense yesterday. I don't like hisI'm not really paying attentiondefense today. They both seemed very calculated and deliberate to me. I can imagine his scum partner telling Beefster over night that they had already lost HWS and that he needed to tone it down a bit.
I can see what yall are saying about Moz, but his posts still have the air of carefree, don't give a damn, town to me.
So you thought I was lying and now realize you were wrong.In post 1531, mozamis wrote:you're just omgusing. I thought you were sum. So i thought you were lying. I was wrong about that. Like you were wrong about FLubber.
yeah but i could see Moz doing it as town.In post 1513, Thor665 wrote:A lie is objective, not subjective.
Do you have a link to him doing it as town? That would go a long way towards resolving my scumread for him.In post 1542, Maxous wrote:yeah but i could see Moz doing it as town.In post 1513, Thor665 wrote:A lie is objective, not subjective.
and that's the important part here
VOTE: mozamisIn post 1543, RadiantCowbells wrote:Alright it's hardball time.
CULT OF ATHENA.
If you do not vote Mozamis with me you are going to be downgraded 2 tiers to a level 6 friend.
If you assumed both claims were fake, why did you expect to die night one? Did you expect scum to kill you?In post 1492, Errantparabola wrote: Yes. In my memory I remembered Transcend and RC both ccing each other, and Transcend going back on it. I think I assumed that both claims were fake.
The thing is that you haven't said anything aboutI mean this is provably untrue.In post 1301, CultOfAthena wrote:But you never gave the "conflicting" part of that interpretation – you never gave any reasons that you townread him. I don't see why, from your perspective, your Max townread exists at all, and combined with the fact that you were voting him just yesterday and never gave any indication of rethinking that read, I'm pretty sure you're faking your reads.In post 1261, Errantparabola wrote:Maxous is definitely playing like lethargic/carefree town or doing a good job of emulating it so I'm conflicted
